Upvote Upvoted 133 Downvote Downvoted
1 ⋅⋅ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ⋅⋅ 27
TF2 benchmarks
271
#271
-2 Frags +
crwFor TF2 only should I go with 4 core CPU (e.g. Athlon 860k) or a 2 core with better single core performance (e.g. g3258)?

Buying a dual-core for gaming isn't a good idea since like 2010 and might cause wierd problems in some games like BF3
tbh the way things are going i'd recommend an AMD 6 or 8 core CPU just so that you dont have to upgrade for some time
but yeah TF2 can run on a dual core processor perfectly fine

[quote=crw]For TF2 only should I go with 4 core CPU (e.g. Athlon 860k) or a 2 core with better single core performance (e.g. g3258)?[/quote]
Buying a dual-core for gaming isn't a good idea since like 2010 and might cause wierd problems in some games like BF3
tbh the way things are going i'd recommend an AMD 6 or 8 core CPU just so that you dont have to upgrade for some time
but yeah TF2 can run on a dual core processor perfectly fine
272
#272
0 Frags +

#273
Try dxlevel 81 if you want more frames.

#273
Try dxlevel 81 if you want more frames.
273
#273
0 Frags +

#275

2639 frames 16.579 seconds 159.18 fps ( 6.28 ms/f) 16.361 fps variability

with dxlevel 81

#275

2639 frames 16.579 seconds 159.18 fps ( 6.28 ms/f) 16.361 fps variability

with dxlevel 81
274
#274
0 Frags +
Just1ssmitteni5 2500k @ 4.2 ghz
evga gtx 970


comanglias mid level pc config
Why would you use mid level pc config on that pc?

because the high level fps was even worse.

Setsul#270
Calling bullshit, there was definitely something else wrong before.

well i also reinstalled windows and upgraded all my computer parts that probably helped too.

[quote=Just1s][quote=smitten][b]i5 2500k @ 4.2 ghz
evga gtx 970[/b]

[b]comanglias mid level pc config[/b][/quote]
Why would you use mid level pc config on that pc?[/quote]

because the high level fps was even worse.


[quote=Setsul]#270
Calling bullshit, there was definitely something else wrong before.[/quote]
well i also reinstalled windows and upgraded all my computer parts that probably helped too.
275
#275
3 Frags +

Just did a couple of tests post update got 220 fps on dxlevel 81, got 183 on dxlevel 90. No real change to my fps though since I last did a benchmark a week or so ago.

Just did a couple of tests post update got 220 fps on dxlevel 81, got 183 on dxlevel 90. No real change to my fps though since I last did a benchmark a week or so ago.
276
#276
-1 Frags +

2639 frames 29.775 seconds 88.63 fps (11.28 ms/f) 6.165 fps variability
AMD FX-4300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
dxlevel 90
1147x620
windowed noborder
comanglia's toaster with sprays, shadows, motion blur, and color correction on (For transparent viewmodels)

2639 frames 29.775 seconds 88.63 fps (11.28 ms/f) 6.165 fps variability
AMD FX-4300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
dxlevel 90
1147x620
windowed noborder
comanglia's toaster with sprays, shadows, motion blur, and color correction on (For transparent viewmodels)
277
#277
3 Frags +

felt like checking dxlevel differences post-update for all the DX9's (since that's going to be mandatory once matchmaking is out, r.i.p.)

same specs as before in this thread (tho I'm now on a clean windows 10, doubt that did too much since this is about the same framerate)

//running a very gently modified version of:
//https://github.com/triant9/my_custom_stuff/blob/master/cfg/lqgfx.cfg
//** denote the timedemos with -dxlevel 9X in launch, * is first run after
//removing -dxlevel, all other benchmarks were after one run

//dxlevel 90
19.415 seconds 135.93 fps ( 7.36 ms/f) 10.504 fps variability **
19.333 seconds 136.51 fps ( 7.33 ms/f) 10.369 fps variability *
18.470 seconds 142.88 fps ( 7.00 ms/f) 10.052 fps variability
19.332 seconds 136.51 fps ( 7.33 ms/f) 9.867 fps variability
18.466 seconds 142.91 fps ( 7.00 ms/f) 10.148 fps variability

//dxlevel 91
19.432 seconds 135.81 fps ( 7.36 ms/f) 10.041 fps variability **
19.916 seconds 132.50 fps ( 7.55 ms/f) 10.165 fps variability *
18.096 seconds 145.83 fps ( 6.86 ms/f) 10.276 fps variability
18.114 seconds 145.69 fps ( 6.86 ms/f) 9.770 fps variability
18.574 seconds 142.08 fps ( 7.04 ms/f) 11.125 fps variability

//dxlevel 95
19.320 seconds 136.59 fps ( 7.32 ms/f) 10.266 fps variability **
19.249 seconds 137.10 fps ( 7.29 ms/f) 10.457 fps variability *
18.223 seconds 144.82 fps ( 6.91 ms/f) 10.019 fps variability
18.288 seconds 144.31 fps ( 6.93 ms/f) 9.519 fps variability
18.263 seconds 144.50 fps ( 6.92 ms/f) 9.867 fps variability

//dxlevel 98
19.297 seconds 136.76 fps ( 7.31 ms/f) 10.139 fps variability **
19.660 seconds 134.23 fps ( 7.45 ms/f) 10.269 fps variability *
18.655 seconds 141.46 fps ( 7.07 ms/f) 10.163 fps variability
18.670 seconds 141.35 fps ( 7.07 ms/f) 9.906 fps variability
18.721 seconds 140.96 fps ( 7.09 ms/f) 9.970 fps variability

first runs always seem to be a bit slower on all counts?

felt like checking dxlevel differences post-update for all the DX9's (since that's going to be mandatory once matchmaking is out, r.i.p.)

same specs as before in this thread (tho I'm now on a clean windows 10, doubt that did too much since this is about the same framerate)

[code]//running a very gently modified version of:
//https://github.com/triant9/my_custom_stuff/blob/master/cfg/lqgfx.cfg
//** denote the timedemos with -dxlevel 9X in launch, * is first run after
//removing -dxlevel, all other benchmarks were after one run

//dxlevel 90
19.415 seconds 135.93 fps ( 7.36 ms/f) 10.504 fps variability **
19.333 seconds 136.51 fps ( 7.33 ms/f) 10.369 fps variability *
18.470 seconds 142.88 fps ( 7.00 ms/f) 10.052 fps variability
19.332 seconds 136.51 fps ( 7.33 ms/f) 9.867 fps variability
18.466 seconds 142.91 fps ( 7.00 ms/f) 10.148 fps variability

//dxlevel 91
19.432 seconds 135.81 fps ( 7.36 ms/f) 10.041 fps variability **
19.916 seconds 132.50 fps ( 7.55 ms/f) 10.165 fps variability *
18.096 seconds 145.83 fps ( 6.86 ms/f) 10.276 fps variability
18.114 seconds 145.69 fps ( 6.86 ms/f) 9.770 fps variability
18.574 seconds 142.08 fps ( 7.04 ms/f) 11.125 fps variability

//dxlevel 95
19.320 seconds 136.59 fps ( 7.32 ms/f) 10.266 fps variability **
19.249 seconds 137.10 fps ( 7.29 ms/f) 10.457 fps variability *
18.223 seconds 144.82 fps ( 6.91 ms/f) 10.019 fps variability
18.288 seconds 144.31 fps ( 6.93 ms/f) 9.519 fps variability
18.263 seconds 144.50 fps ( 6.92 ms/f) 9.867 fps variability

//dxlevel 98
19.297 seconds 136.76 fps ( 7.31 ms/f) 10.139 fps variability **
19.660 seconds 134.23 fps ( 7.45 ms/f) 10.269 fps variability *
18.655 seconds 141.46 fps ( 7.07 ms/f) 10.163 fps variability
18.670 seconds 141.35 fps ( 7.07 ms/f) 9.906 fps variability
18.721 seconds 140.96 fps ( 7.09 ms/f) 9.970 fps variability[/code]

first runs always seem to be a bit slower on all counts?
278
#278
0 Frags +

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel G41 Express Chipset (Intel HD)
Comaglia's mid pc cfg changed to be Toaster config (640x480, fullscreen, dxlevel 81)

2639 frames 96.821 seconds 27.26 fps (36.69 ms/f) 4.696 fps variability

:/

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel G41 Express Chipset (Intel HD)
Comaglia's mid pc cfg changed to be Toaster config (640x480, fullscreen, dxlevel 81)
[code]2639 frames 96.821 seconds 27.26 fps (36.69 ms/f) 4.696 fps variability[/code]
:/
279
#279
0 Frags +
Mad_ScientistIntel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel G41 Express Chipset (Intel HD)
Comaglia's mid pc cfg changed to be Toaster config (640x480, fullscreen, dxlevel 81)
2639 frames 96.821 seconds 27.26 fps (36.69 ms/f) 4.696 fps variability
:/

Crickey you need a new computer mate, hit Setsul up in the PC build thread.

[quote=Mad_Scientist]Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel G41 Express Chipset (Intel HD)
Comaglia's mid pc cfg changed to be Toaster config (640x480, fullscreen, dxlevel 81)
[code]2639 frames 96.821 seconds 27.26 fps (36.69 ms/f) 4.696 fps variability[/code]
:/[/quote]
Crickey you need a new computer mate, hit Setsul up in the PC build thread.
280
#280
0 Frags +
VanaMad_ScientistIntel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel G41 Express Chipset (Intel HD)
Comaglia's mid pc cfg changed to be Toaster config (640x480, fullscreen, dxlevel 81)
2639 frames 96.821 seconds 27.26 fps (36.69 ms/f) 4.696 fps variability
:/
Crickey you need a new computer mate, hit Setsul up in the PC build thread.

i'm actually getting some new nvidia gpu tommorow so hopefully i won't screw the installation up :D
EDIT: i'll be sure to post the benchmark here too

[quote=Vana][quote=Mad_Scientist]Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel G41 Express Chipset (Intel HD)
Comaglia's mid pc cfg changed to be Toaster config (640x480, fullscreen, dxlevel 81)
[code]2639 frames 96.821 seconds 27.26 fps (36.69 ms/f) 4.696 fps variability[/code]
:/[/quote]
Crickey you need a new computer mate, hit Setsul up in the PC build thread.[/quote]
i'm actually getting some new nvidia gpu tommorow so hopefully i won't screw the installation up :D
EDIT: i'll be sure to post the benchmark here too
281
#281
-3 Frags +

boy will u be disappointed ...

boy will u be disappointed ...
282
#282
3 Frags +
Mad_ScientistVanaMad_ScientistIntel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel G41 Express Chipset (Intel HD)
Comaglia's mid pc cfg changed to be Toaster config (640x480, fullscreen, dxlevel 81)
2639 frames 96.821 seconds 27.26 fps (36.69 ms/f) 4.696 fps variability
:/
Crickey you need a new computer mate, hit Setsul up in the PC build thread.
i'm actually getting some new nvidia gpu tommorow so hopefully i won't screw the installation up :D
EDIT: i'll be sure to post the benchmark here too

gpu wont help much with tf2, its mainly cpu bound.

[quote=Mad_Scientist][quote=Vana][quote=Mad_Scientist]Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel G41 Express Chipset (Intel HD)
Comaglia's mid pc cfg changed to be Toaster config (640x480, fullscreen, dxlevel 81)
[code]2639 frames 96.821 seconds 27.26 fps (36.69 ms/f) 4.696 fps variability[/code]
:/[/quote]
Crickey you need a new computer mate, hit Setsul up in the PC build thread.[/quote]
i'm actually getting some new nvidia gpu tommorow so hopefully i won't screw the installation up :D
EDIT: i'll be sure to post the benchmark here too[/quote]
gpu wont help much with tf2, its mainly cpu bound.
283
#283
-1 Frags +
Mad_ScientistVanaMad_ScientistIntel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel G41 Express Chipset (Intel HD)
Comaglia's mid pc cfg changed to be Toaster config (640x480, fullscreen, dxlevel 81)
2639 frames 96.821 seconds 27.26 fps (36.69 ms/f) 4.696 fps variability
:/
Crickey you need a new computer mate, hit Setsul up in the PC build thread.
i'm actually getting some new nvidia gpu tommorow so hopefully i won't screw the installation up :D
EDIT: i'll be sure to post the benchmark here too

Assuming you buy a suitable GPU, installation of that is extremely easy - just put it in the PCI-E slot :D

That CPU shouldn't be too hard to OC, either. I would only really recommend that if you know what you're doing, so consult some people first.

[quote=Mad_Scientist][quote=Vana][quote=Mad_Scientist]Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 GHz
4GB RAM
Intel G41 Express Chipset (Intel HD)
Comaglia's mid pc cfg changed to be Toaster config (640x480, fullscreen, dxlevel 81)
[code]2639 frames 96.821 seconds 27.26 fps (36.69 ms/f) 4.696 fps variability[/code]
:/[/quote]
Crickey you need a new computer mate, hit Setsul up in the PC build thread.[/quote]
i'm actually getting some new nvidia gpu tommorow so hopefully i won't screw the installation up :D
EDIT: i'll be sure to post the benchmark here too[/quote]

Assuming you buy a suitable GPU, installation of that is extremely easy - just put it in the PCI-E slot :D

That CPU shouldn't be too hard to OC, either. I would only really recommend that if you know what you're doing, so consult some people first.
284
#284
0 Frags +

4843 frames 34.087 seconds 142.08 fps ( 7.04 ms/f) 21.361 fps variability

intel xeon 1230v2
6gb ram, ssd
gtx 570

Resolution: 1920x1080
dx 9.0

4843 frames 34.087 seconds 142.08 fps ( 7.04 ms/f) 21.361 fps variability

intel xeon 1230v2
6gb ram, ssd
gtx 570

Resolution: 1920x1080
dx 9.0
285
#285
0 Frags +

2639 frames 24.580 seconds 107.36 fps ( 9.31 ms/f) 14.771 fps variability

intel i5 4690K @3.5 GHz (I will OC it later this week, might update results)
8gb RAM
r9 380

1440x900
dxlevel 9.1

Everything maxed out with shadows, gibs and ragdolls disabled.

2639 frames 24.580 seconds 107.36 fps ( 9.31 ms/f) 14.771 fps variability

intel i5 4690K @3.5 GHz (I will OC it later this week, might update results)
8gb RAM
r9 380

1440x900
dxlevel 9.1

Everything maxed out with shadows, gibs and ragdolls disabled.
286
#286
0 Frags +

Can someone explain what it means?

EDIT: What I got with -default

2639 frames 43.209 seconds 61.07 fps (16.37 ms/f) 5.902 fps variability
Can someone explain what it means?

EDIT: What I got with -default
[code]
2639 frames 43.209 seconds 61.07 fps (16.37 ms/f) 5.902 fps variability[/code]
287
#287
0 Frags +

Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 Ghz
GIGABYTE GV-N220OC-1GI (nVidia 220 chipset)
4GB RAM
Comaglia's mid pc fps config changed to be toaster (640x480, dxlevel 81, fullscreen)

2639 frames 31.628 seconds 83.44 fps (11.98 ms/f) 8.327 fps variability

No configs, 1440x900, settings here:

http://imgur.com/5cH94QU

2639 frames 49.476 seconds 53.34 fps (18.75 ms/f) 4.675 fps variability
Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2.93 Ghz
GIGABYTE GV-N220OC-1GI (nVidia 220 chipset)
4GB RAM
Comaglia's mid pc fps config changed to be toaster (640x480, dxlevel 81, fullscreen)
[code]2639 frames 31.628 seconds 83.44 fps (11.98 ms/f) 8.327 fps variability[/code]

No configs, 1440x900, settings here:[img]http://imgur.com/5cH94QU[/img]
[code]2639 frames 49.476 seconds 53.34 fps (18.75 ms/f) 4.675 fps variability[/code]
288
#288
0 Frags +

dxlevel 81:

Show Content
2639 frames 21.027 seconds 125.50 fps ( 7.97 ms/f) 10.400 fps variability
2639 frames 20.865 seconds 126.48 fps ( 7.91 ms/f) 9.478 fps variability
2639 frames 20.957 seconds 125.93 fps ( 7.94 ms/f) 9.393 fps variability
//AVG
2639 frames 20.945 seconds 125.97 fps ( 7.94 ms/f) 9.757 fps variability
with Hrbls No Hats Mod2639 frames 20.043 seconds 131.66 fps ( 7.60 ms/f) 10.973 fps variability
2639 frames 19.889 seconds 132.68 fps ( 7.54 ms/f) 9.967 fps variability
2639 frames 19.803 seconds 133.27 fps ( 7.50 ms/f) 9.863 fps variability
//AVG
2639 frames 19.912 seconds 132.54 fps ( 7.55 ms/f) 10.268 fps variability

dxlevel 91:

Show Content
2639 frames 23.279 seconds 113.36 fps ( 8.82 ms/f) 9.323 fps variability
2639 frames 22.979 seconds 114.84 fps ( 8.71 ms/f) 7.936 fps variability
2639 frames 22.977 seconds 114.85 fps ( 8.71 ms/f) 8.098 fps variability
//AVG
2639 frames 23.078 seconds 114.35 fps ( 8.75 ms/f) 8.452 fps variability
with Hrbls No Hats Mod2639 frames 22.071 seconds 119.57 fps ( 8.36 ms/f) 9.714 fps variability
2639 frames 21.810 seconds 121.00 fps ( 8.26 ms/f) 8.573 fps variability
2639 frames 21.927 seconds 120.36 fps ( 8.31 ms/f) 8.606 fps variability
//AVG
2639 frames 21.936 seconds 120.31 fps ( 8.31 ms/f) 8.964 fps variability

Windows 10
CPU and overclock: FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
Graphics Card: MSI GeForce GTX 970

Driver version: 361.43
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Comanglia high quality PC
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled
Mat_picmip: -1

EDIT:

So I OC'd to 4.2GHz and got average fps of 166.31 with dx81 and no hats mod, ye boi :D

dxlevel 81:
[spoiler][quote]2639 frames 21.027 seconds 125.50 fps ( 7.97 ms/f) 10.400 fps variability
2639 frames 20.865 seconds 126.48 fps ( 7.91 ms/f) 9.478 fps variability
2639 frames 20.957 seconds 125.93 fps ( 7.94 ms/f) 9.393 fps variability
//AVG
2639 frames 20.945 seconds 125.97 fps ( 7.94 ms/f) 9.757 fps variability[/quote]
with Hrbls No Hats Mod
[quote]2639 frames 20.043 seconds 131.66 fps ( 7.60 ms/f) 10.973 fps variability
2639 frames 19.889 seconds 132.68 fps ( 7.54 ms/f) 9.967 fps variability
2639 frames 19.803 seconds 133.27 fps ( 7.50 ms/f) 9.863 fps variability
//AVG
2639 frames 19.912 seconds 132.54 fps ( 7.55 ms/f) 10.268 fps variability[/quote][/spoiler]
dxlevel 91:
[spoiler][quote]2639 frames 23.279 seconds 113.36 fps ( 8.82 ms/f) 9.323 fps variability
2639 frames 22.979 seconds 114.84 fps ( 8.71 ms/f) 7.936 fps variability
2639 frames 22.977 seconds 114.85 fps ( 8.71 ms/f) 8.098 fps variability
//AVG
2639 frames 23.078 seconds 114.35 fps ( 8.75 ms/f) 8.452 fps variability[/quote]
with Hrbls No Hats Mod
[quote]2639 frames 22.071 seconds 119.57 fps ( 8.36 ms/f) 9.714 fps variability
2639 frames 21.810 seconds 121.00 fps ( 8.26 ms/f) 8.573 fps variability
2639 frames 21.927 seconds 120.36 fps ( 8.31 ms/f) 8.606 fps variability
//AVG
2639 frames 21.936 seconds 120.31 fps ( 8.31 ms/f) 8.964 fps variability[/quote][/spoiler]

Windows 10
CPU and overclock: FX-8350 @ 4.0 GHz
Graphics Card: MSI GeForce GTX 970

Driver version: 361.43
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Comanglia high quality PC
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled
Mat_picmip: -1


EDIT:

So I OC'd to 4.2GHz and got average fps of 166.31 with dx81 and no hats mod, ye boi :D
289
#289
0 Frags +
2639 frames 13.003 seconds 202.95 fps ( 4.93 ms/f) 22.486 fps variability

i7 3960X @ 4.25 GHz
R9 390
DX9, 1080p

Picking up a 3960X off ebay is a great way to keep your room warm during winter.

[code]2639 frames 13.003 seconds 202.95 fps ( 4.93 ms/f) 22.486 fps variability
[/code]

i7 3960X @ 4.25 GHz
R9 390
DX9, 1080p

Picking up a 3960X off ebay is a great way to keep your room warm during winter.
290
#290
3 Frags +

Intel i5-4690K
EVGA GeForce GTX970 FTW ACX 2.0
8-GB Kit G.Skill Rip Jaws-X PC3 17066U
MSI Z97 Gaming 5
Win 7 64 bit
Latest Bios Version and Latest Nvidia Driver Version
Resulution: 1920 x 1080
Launch Options:-high -console -novid -h 1080 -w 1920 -full -dxlevel 81 or 91 depends run some benchmarks to see whitch one is better for you :>
Autoexec and fps.cfg Basicly made by Schocky and some tiny small changes by me.
Additional Things: ill use that mod or whatever u wanna call it to let dissapear the bulletholes in walls and iam using this wierd particle effect to let dissapear the big useless explosions

And to be Fair i stopped running every useless Process (for example google chrome) and only run Steam TF2 and MSI Intel Extreme Tuning Utility

autoexec and fps Default CPU Settings (My Default Settings in [MSI Intel extreme Tuning Utility] all 4 cores set to 40 and processor cache Ratio to 39 Just to let u know)

2639 frames 13.008 seconds 202.87 fps ( 4.93 ms/f) 16.953 fps variability Dx91

2639 frames 12.758 seconds 206.86 fps ( 4.83 ms/f) 16.912 fps variability Dx91

2639 frames 12.649 seconds 208.63 fps ( 4.79 ms/f) 15.627 fps variability Dx91

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

autoexec and fps + oc (Just in [MSI Intel extreme Tuning Utility] all 4 cores set to 41 and processor cache Ratio to 40)

2639 frames 12.204 seconds 216.25 fps ( 4.62 ms/f) 13.261 fps variability Dx91

2639 frames 12.198 seconds 216.34 fps ( 4.62 ms/f) 13.078 fps variability Dx91

2639 frames 12.161 seconds 217.01 fps ( 4.61 ms/f) 13.056 fps variability Dx91

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

autoexec and fps + oc (Just in [MSI Intel extreme Tuning Utility] all 4 cores set to 41 and processor cache Ratio to 40)

2639 frames 11.063 seconds 238.55 fps ( 4.19 ms/f) 18.061 fps variability Dx81

2639 frames 11.022 seconds 239.43 fps ( 4.18 ms/f) 19.029 fps variability Dx81

2639 frames 10.782 seconds 244.75 fps ( 4.09 ms/f) 16.401 fps variability Dx81

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

autoexec and fps Default CPU Settings (My Default Settings in [MSI Intel extreme Tuning Utility] all 4 cores set to 40 and processor cache Ratio to 39 Just to let u know)

2639 frames 11.320 seconds 233.13 fps ( 4.29 ms/f) 17.867 fps variability Dx81

2639 frames 11.321 seconds 233.12 fps ( 4.29 ms/f) 18.696 fps variability Dx81

2639 frames 11.232 seconds 234.95 fps ( 4.26 ms/f) 17.193 fps variability Dx81

IF i forgot something or anything u want to know feel free to leave a comment on my profile or add me
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198019006505/

Download to FPS.cfg and Autoexec http://www.file-upload.net/download-11173584/FPS.CFG__Autoexec.zip.html

Intel i5-4690K
EVGA GeForce GTX970 FTW ACX 2.0
8-GB Kit G.Skill Rip Jaws-X PC3 17066U
MSI Z97 Gaming 5
Win 7 64 bit
Latest Bios Version and Latest Nvidia Driver Version
Resulution: 1920 x 1080
Launch Options:-high -console -novid -h 1080 -w 1920 -full -dxlevel 81 or 91 depends run some benchmarks to see whitch one is better for you :>
Autoexec and fps.cfg Basicly made by Schocky and some tiny small changes by me.
Additional Things: ill use that mod or whatever u wanna call it to let dissapear the bulletholes in walls and iam using this wierd particle effect to let dissapear the big useless explosions

And to be Fair i stopped running every useless Process (for example google chrome) and only run Steam TF2 and MSI Intel Extreme Tuning Utility


autoexec and fps Default CPU Settings (My Default Settings in [MSI Intel extreme Tuning Utility] all 4 cores set to 40 and processor cache Ratio to 39 Just to let u know)

2639 frames 13.008 seconds 202.87 fps ( 4.93 ms/f) 16.953 fps variability Dx91

2639 frames 12.758 seconds 206.86 fps ( 4.83 ms/f) 16.912 fps variability Dx91

2639 frames 12.649 seconds 208.63 fps ( 4.79 ms/f) 15.627 fps variability Dx91

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

autoexec and fps + oc (Just in [MSI Intel extreme Tuning Utility] all 4 cores set to 41 and processor cache Ratio to 40)

2639 frames 12.204 seconds 216.25 fps ( 4.62 ms/f) 13.261 fps variability Dx91

2639 frames 12.198 seconds 216.34 fps ( 4.62 ms/f) 13.078 fps variability Dx91

2639 frames 12.161 seconds 217.01 fps ( 4.61 ms/f) 13.056 fps variability Dx91

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

autoexec and fps + oc (Just in [MSI Intel extreme Tuning Utility] all 4 cores set to 41 and processor cache Ratio to 40)

2639 frames 11.063 seconds 238.55 fps ( 4.19 ms/f) 18.061 fps variability Dx81

2639 frames 11.022 seconds 239.43 fps ( 4.18 ms/f) 19.029 fps variability Dx81

2639 frames 10.782 seconds 244.75 fps ( 4.09 ms/f) 16.401 fps variability Dx81

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

autoexec and fps Default CPU Settings (My Default Settings in [MSI Intel extreme Tuning Utility] all 4 cores set to 40 and processor cache Ratio to 39 Just to let u know)

2639 frames 11.320 seconds 233.13 fps ( 4.29 ms/f) 17.867 fps variability Dx81

2639 frames 11.321 seconds 233.12 fps ( 4.29 ms/f) 18.696 fps variability Dx81

2639 frames 11.232 seconds 234.95 fps ( 4.26 ms/f) 17.193 fps variability Dx81

IF i forgot something or anything u want to know feel free to leave a comment on my profile or add me
https://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198019006505/

Download to FPS.cfg and Autoexec http://www.file-upload.net/download-11173584/FPS.CFG__Autoexec.zip.html
291
#291
5 Frags +

I finally did some bare minimum testing regarding speed vs timings.
In other news I still hate manually adjusting DRAM timings.

speed timings latency fps
1333MHz CL9 ~13.5ms 222,53
1333MHz CL7 ~10.5ms 229,29 +3,04%
2400MHz CL12 ~10ms 245,66 +7,14% +10,39%

For reference:
typical DDR3, 1600MHz CL9: 11,25ms
typical DDR4, 2400MHz CL15: 12,5ms

In other words Skylake is definitely the way to go.
Pushing an i3-6100 to 4.5GHz (praise the non-K overclocking, I called it), should be far better than an i5-4590 (about the same price) and about on par with an overclocked i5-4690K (about 100$ more expensive unless you drop the Z mobo).

I finally did some bare minimum testing regarding speed vs timings.
In other news I still hate manually adjusting DRAM timings.

speed timings latency fps
1333MHz CL9 ~13.5ms 222,53
1333MHz CL7 ~10.5ms 229,29 +3,04%
2400MHz CL12 ~10ms 245,66 +7,14% +10,39%

For reference:
typical DDR3, 1600MHz CL9: 11,25ms
typical DDR4, 2400MHz CL15: 12,5ms

In other words Skylake is definitely the way to go.
Pushing an i3-6100 to 4.5GHz (praise the non-K overclocking, I called it), should be far better than an i5-4590 (about the same price) and about on par with an [b]overclocked[/b] i5-4690K (about 100$ more expensive unless you drop the Z mobo).
292
#292
1 Frags +

OLD Rig

2639 frames 16.367 seconds 161.24 fps ( 6.20 ms/f) 11.605 fps variability 

CPU and overclock: AMD FX-6100@4.2Ghz
Graphics Card: Radeon HD7770

dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1600x900
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Slightly modified comanglia's + nohats mod + no explosion smoke script
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

NEW Rig

2639 frames 11.163 seconds 236.41 fps ( 4.23 ms/f) 16.189 fps variability

CPU and overclock: i5 4690k @ 3.5 GHz(default)
Graphics Card: Radeon HD7770

dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1600x900
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: FPS configs enabled: Slightly modified comanglia's + nohats mod + no explosion smoke script
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

So i5 4690k @ stock speed is about 32% faster than fx-6100 @4.2ghz. Gonna overclock it just havent received cooler yet :P

OLD Rig [code]2639 frames 16.367 seconds 161.24 fps ( 6.20 ms/f) 11.605 fps variability [/code]
CPU and overclock: AMD FX-6100@4.2Ghz
Graphics Card: Radeon HD7770

dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1600x900
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: Slightly modified comanglia's + nohats mod + no explosion smoke script
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

NEW Rig [code]2639 frames 11.163 seconds 236.41 fps ( 4.23 ms/f) 16.189 fps variability[/code]
CPU and overclock: i5 4690k @ 3.5 GHz(default)
Graphics Card: Radeon HD7770

dxlevel (default is 90): 81
Resolution: 1600x900
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: FPS configs enabled: Slightly modified comanglia's + nohats mod + no explosion smoke script
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

So i5 4690k @ stock speed is about 32% faster than fx-6100 @4.2ghz. Gonna overclock it just havent received cooler yet :P
293
#293
0 Frags +
2639 frames 81.742 seconds 32.28 fps (30.97 ms/f) 1.683 fps variability

iMac with Mac OS X 10.11.2
CPU: 3,6 GHz Intel Core i5
Memory: 4 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 5670 512 MB

Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen of windowed: Full-screen
Shadows enabled/disabled: enabled

[quote]2639 frames 81.742 seconds 32.28 fps (30.97 ms/f) 1.683 fps variability[/quote]

iMac with Mac OS X 10.11.2
CPU: 3,6 GHz Intel Core i5
Memory: 4 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 5670 512 MB

Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen of windowed: Full-screen
Shadows enabled/disabled: enabled
294
#294
0 Frags +

2639 frames 113.475 seconds 23.26 fps (43.00 ms/f) 1.991 fps variability
CPU:AMD E-450 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics (Dual-core,two is 1.65ghz)
Graphics Card:AMD Radeon HD 6320 Graphics
dxlevel:dxlevel81
Resolution:1280x768
Full-screen or windowed: noborder
FPS configs enabled:Rhapsody's Performance Config(Disabled gibs,ragdolls,facial features)
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled

2639 frames 113.475 seconds 23.26 fps (43.00 ms/f) 1.991 fps variability
CPU:AMD E-450 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics (Dual-core,two is 1.65ghz)
Graphics Card:AMD Radeon HD 6320 Graphics
dxlevel:dxlevel81
Resolution:1280x768
Full-screen or windowed: noborder
FPS configs enabled:Rhapsody's Performance Config(Disabled gibs,ragdolls,facial features)
Shadows enabled/disabled: disabled
295
#295
1 Frags +
2639 frames 23.638 seconds 111.64 fps ( 8.96 ms/f) 8.055 fps variability
 

CPU: Intel Core I5 6600 @ 3.3 ghz
Graphics Card: Nvidia GTX 980TI

dxlevel (default is 90): 90
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full Screen
FPS configs enabled: None
Shadows enabled/disabled: Enabled

Haven't done anything to launch options or configs yet on the new rig. Not sure if I've got everything set up quite right yet.

[code]2639 frames 23.638 seconds 111.64 fps ( 8.96 ms/f) 8.055 fps variability
[/code]
CPU: Intel Core I5 6600 @ 3.3 ghz
Graphics Card: Nvidia GTX 980TI

dxlevel (default is 90): 90
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full Screen
FPS configs enabled: None
Shadows enabled/disabled: Enabled

Haven't done anything to launch options or configs yet on the new rig. Not sure if I've got everything set up quite right yet.
296
#296
1 Frags +
2639 frames 13.795 seconds 191.31 fps ( 5.23 ms/f) 12.458 fps variability

New Rig, cheers Setsul

CPU: Intel Core i5 6600k @ 3.5 GHz (Turbo's to 3.9 GHz)
Graphics Card: Asus R9 270x

dxlevel: 90
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: slightly modified comangles high quality pc config, mac's nohats mod, sapper particle explosion effect
Shadows enabled/disabled: Disabled

[code]2639 frames 13.795 seconds 191.31 fps ( 5.23 ms/f) 12.458 fps variability[/code]
New Rig, cheers Setsul

CPU: Intel Core i5 6600k @ 3.5 GHz (Turbo's to 3.9 GHz)
Graphics Card: Asus R9 270x

dxlevel: 90
Resolution: 1920x1080
Full-screen or windowed: Full
FPS configs enabled: slightly modified comangles high quality pc config, mac's nohats mod, sapper particle explosion effect
Shadows enabled/disabled: Disabled
297
#297
0 Frags +

2639 frames 19.612 seconds 134.56 fps

CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 ES 2.5 GHz (3.1 GHz Turbo)
GPU: 7970 GHz edition

dxlevel:98
Resolution: 1920x1080 144hz full screen

no config, high textures, 4xaa, 16xaf, low settings, ragdolls off

2639 frames 19.612 seconds 134.56 fps

CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 ES 2.5 GHz (3.1 GHz Turbo)
GPU: 7970 GHz edition

dxlevel:98
Resolution: 1920x1080 144hz full screen

no config, high textures, 4xaa, 16xaf, low settings, ragdolls off
298
#298
-1 Frags +
2639 frames 16.385 seconds 161.06 fps ( 6.21 ms/f) 16.777 fps variability

i7-4770k @ 4.5 GHz 780 Ti 16gb ram
1080p fullscreen Comanglia's config with shadows enabled dx81

[code]2639 frames 16.385 seconds 161.06 fps ( 6.21 ms/f) 16.777 fps variability[/code]

i7-4770k @ 4.5 GHz 780 Ti 16gb ram
1080p fullscreen Comanglia's config with shadows enabled dx81
299
#299
6 Frags +

As a experiment i decided to build what would be a normal gaming PC when TF2 came out.

Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2.41ghz 2gb ram 7900 GTX 512mb

640*480 Comangia's potato config dx81

2179 frames 59.814 seconds 36.43 fps (27.45 ms/f) 2.559 fps variability

As a experiment i decided to build what would be a normal gaming PC when TF2 came out.

Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2.41ghz 2gb ram 7900 GTX 512mb

640*480 Comangia's potato config dx81

2179 frames 59.814 seconds 36.43 fps (27.45 ms/f) 2.559 fps variability
300
#300
0 Frags +

Could you do one for the game at maybe 1600x900 with all default settings?

Could you do one for the game at maybe 1600x900 with all default settings?
1 ⋅⋅ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ⋅⋅ 27
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.