tbh if it's a perfect sensor it's probably at the point now where you wouldn't be negatively affected by the fact that it's wireless apart from the extra weight and the price, wired mice are still simpler and always more reliable but I feel like if you really hated wires one of these would be fine for 99% of people

G900 - Chaos Spectrum

LinusTechTips review
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1o2HBm_uNk
Logitech Page
http://gaming.logitech.com/en-us/product/g900-chaos-spectrum-mouse

To the topic at hand: the testing is far better than I've seen for just about any other wireless mouse testing, now would I call the output signal of ~50dBm worst case scenario? Definitely not. Then again it's not like it matter cause you can actually extend the wireless receiver to be within .5m of the mouse (depending on mouse pad size). Also this test is alot more about showing how much wireless performance really has improved with the g900 over standard wireless gaming mice of just a year or more ago.

Also they really should compare the g900 to the g303 for the latency comparison cause it's been obvious for a long time the logitech is far and away better at click latency and motion tracking latency.

G900 spec sheet
Connection Type: Wired/Wireless
USB Protocol: USB 2.0
DPI (Min/Max): 200-12,000
USB Report Rate: 1ms
Sensor: PMW3366 (same as g502 and g303)
Indicator Lights (LED): Yes, RGB
Buttons: 6-11
Other Features: Hyperfast scroll wheel, on-the-fly DPS adjustment, up to 5 onboard profiles
Physical specifications
Height: 5.12 in (130 mm)
Width: 2.64 in (67 mm)
Depth: 1.57 in (40 mm)
Weight: 3.80 oz (107 g) mouse only (for reference g400s = ~118g, g402 = 108g these are both without cable included)
Cable Length (Power/Charging): 6 ft (1.83 M)

no one here would call themselves 99% of mouse users tho :(

Wireless mice have always been fine for dads and office workers and normies and even casual gamers, but considering everyone here makes active decisions in their setup that result in saving maybe a tick or two, I'd be surprised if anyone would voluntarily use something like this even if the sensor delay was only 50% slower than a wire, if only because esportsnerds are so ornery and superstitious

I would love if there was a g303/ninox aurora like wireless mouse. But there is no way they could make one that accurate and lightweight.

The G900 is faster wireless than a Razer DA Chroma is wired, in terms of not only click latency but also motion delay. And Logitech did test it with an absolute worst case scenario in the anechoic chamber too, what Linus Tech Tips showed there was the interference of a 300 man Lan. And even so you can just plug it in then and be fine. At home you will have no problem guaranteed.

http://i.imgur.com/anoxJOo.png

They could, there is no market for that though. You'd need to go absolutely barebone and the sidebuttons would be worse, but considering the extra weight in the G100s is just as much as the battery in the G900 weighs it is possible.

tfw you're using a wireless Logitech mouse and it works perfectly with your small hands.

Did you actually watch the video? The point of it is that it actually has lower sensor and click latency than their example wired mouse.

i guess you can now use your fancy cord bungee to hang the G900 dongle close to your mouse!
also, it's almost funny how this wireless mouse has lower latency than popular wired mice of competitors.

anyway. specs and test results seem fantastic. it's not even too heavy (for me).
but that price man.... i gotta say no. i am just not that interested in wireless.

Mostly in agreement with this. I might give the g900 a shot sometime early next year especially after I see some full reviews done by Ino on overclock.net. $150 though is pretty damn expensive for a mouse regardless of what kind it is.

-edit-
Ino has already done a review apparently.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1595865/review-of-logitech-g900-chaos-spectrum-wireless-gaming-mouse-by-ino

Yes I have :)

The problem I have with wireless mouses is how fucking expensive they are. The g900 is literally double the price of its g502 wired counter part, in Australia at least. If it was cheaper then it would be really decent. I mean it has the best sensor on the market and weighs 107 grams which is lighter than the g502 I'm pretty sure?
Still leaning on the heavier side though

edit: Last thing, does it even have hyper scrolling? it would be weird if it doesn't, especially due to its price, that scroll wheel does look a bit flimsy

It has hyper scrolling.
Personally the weight is less of an issue because it is wireless, but I still prefer my ZA11 over it, mainly due to shape.

i know logitech wouldn't want to do it against their own mice, but the only problem i have with their tests is that i would never even consider to buy any of the current razer or steelseries mice. they are utterly inferior in my eyes.

i want to see those same tests done to compare the other logitech mice & zowie mice against the g900.

It really stings for Razer and Steelseries as I feel their products have been quite far behind in comparison to Zowie, Logitech etc.

Even though I'm not a fan of Logitech's design they really do push the boundaries on what is technically achievable.

I ordered mine and I'll review it in some retarded way.

super hype
could you possibly run latency tests against your g303 (if you still have it) when you get your g900? blurbusters forums have some great guides on how to setup latency comparison tests. click latency & mouse input latency are my biggest concern.

how heavy tho?

"if only because esportsnerds are so ornery and superstitious"

do people only read half of posts?

logitech claims that Wired G900 = G303 when it comes to latency, and that Wireless G900 is only 1.2ms slower than Wired.
though, i presume that the 1.2 that they claim is best-case-scenario..

as for 3310 mice (including most zowie mice), i wouldn't be surprised if the Wireless G900 actually beats them all:
the sensor actually has some inherent delay (i believe around ~2ms), which already gives the 3366 a head-start. on top of that, a lot of mice with the 3310 don't actually have a very good implementation of the sensor, which often adds more delay.
as for click latency, zowie their mice have always scored low. i doubt any of their mice comes close to the Wireless G900 tbh.

and for example the finalmouse (that uses a 3310 also) has ~4ms delay, meaning the Wireless G900 is already faster.

unfortunately all these test results are scattered everywhere on overclock, esreality and a few other sites, otherwise i'd just dump it all here. but if you really care about input delay you're probably best off just stalking user qsxcv on overclock.

but the fact that for example the DA Chroma is a popular mouse just shows how little a few ms of lag actually matters to the average user. so even if the Wireless G900 would be a few ms slower than a G303, almost no-one would have any idea that the delay is even there.

You can use this mouse in either wireless or wired mode. According to the threads on overclock.net the mouse has a ~ 1 ms delay between wireless and wired mode (1.2ms according to logitech's CPate). Wired apparently the performance is the same as the g303 and g502. I'd imagine that could increase in non ideal situations but a 1ms delay is really not going to do much. The shape is way better than most other logitech mice and the weight is pretty good considering it has to have a battery.

The main problem is the crazy price which makes it completely not worthwhile. I wouldn't be surprised if they brought out a cheaper wired version down the line or the price drops though.
Damn I got ninjad but yeah.

I have a feeling a large part of the price here is related to R&D, this is a rather significant upgrade for wireless gaming mice in nearly every way.

"even if the sensor delay was only 50% slower than a wire" when the claim is that it's actually faster

do people not even read their own posts?

Even if the responsiveness was on par with corded mice it would still be useless. The batteries make wireless mice unusably heavy.

It's a few grams lighter than deathadder tho

DA is overweight but that isn't as bad as i expected. Usually these wireless mice are well over 200 grams. 105 grams is still to heavy IMO but that is a significant improvement over there previous wireless mice.

this mouse deserves a bump
the g900 is the best mouse i've used, hands down. the performance isn't a lie. i feel absolutely no difference in responsiveness to my zowie za12 with omrons, both in click delay & sensor tracking.