| Account Details | |
|---|---|
| SteamID64 | 76561197990553044 |
| SteamID3 | [U:1:30287316] |
| SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:15143658 |
| Country | United States |
| Signed Up | July 9, 2012 |
| Last Posted | January 20, 2019 at 7:17 PM |
| Posts | 2919 (0.6 per day) |
| Game Settings | |
|---|---|
| In-game Sensitivity | |
| Windows Sensitivity | |
| Raw Input | 1 |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
|
| Hardware Peripherals | |
|---|---|
| Mouse | |
| Keyboard | |
| Mousepad | |
| Headphones | |
| Monitor | |
If the 3D monitor is cheaper then go for it, just make sure it's actually a 120Hz monitor. Some 60Hz monitors support 3D.
With 3D you can use Lightboost, which allows for better motion clarity. You do get some input lag with it on though, so I wouldn't recommend it for playing any FPS.
Just play what you like. If you like everything, then good for you! You would have the most options for teams.
So my CEVO team just died (tons of roster issues and our demo just quit), so I'm teamless.
I'm looking for a team in ESEA, CEVO, or UGC 6s. I am willing to start in all three, but I will only backup in ESEA or CEVO. I've played all of my ESEA matches as medic, most of my CEVO matches as medic, one CEVO match as scout, and half a season in UGC of both medic and scout.
Please pick a hooky for your team :<
Got my car! 2004 Subaru Outback. Can't drive it yet as I need to get it reregistered (Thursday or Friday).
http://i.imgur.com/JrKRnRw.jpg
Excuse the mess, my dad has way too much stuff out there.
Album with more pics: http://imgur.com/a/iUw7x#0
cp_notbadlands
Hellbentshould also include poker II. ive heard great things about them and i get mine tomorrow
Lemon's profileLast Posted January 1, 2014 at 2:03 AM
rip
Just tested out both, and 144Hz does seem more responsive than Lightboost. Still doesn't change the fact that Lightboost is smoother and a good idea overall, we just need a better implementation of it. I'll be using 144Hz from now on. Hopefully Nvidia improves Lightboost for 2D gaming.
Wait, Lightboost is terrible? I've never noticed the input lag. I'll need to check this out.
cyzerIgnoring these 2 dum-dums over what seems to be the biggest multithreaded fight in history, the general consensus is that lightboost for gaming is bad because of input lag? So I'm better off just using 120hz and no lightboost? God damn that's what I get for jumping on the bandwagon.
I would think 144Hz would be better, if you have it.
Seems like the Quickfire Rapid is being discontinued and being completely superseded by the Rapid-i:
http://i.imgur.com/L3ng8UA.png
rip one of the best low-cost mechanical keyboard options
Has a team ever tried to pocket soldiers?
no, never
I don't think two pockets has been tried, at least not seriously. Might be worth trying, but it would be a little weird.
Oh yeah, forgot to mention that you should get the 4690k if it's cheaper no matter what.
But you can only pick that CPU up at a Micro Center store for that price. Might want to reconsider if you don't have one near you.
I would replace the 4690 with a 4690k if you think you might overclock. Same thing with a higher base clock, and more precise overclocking. You would definitely need to buy a cooler to overclock though, but you could always buy one at a later date.
If you don't think you'll ever overclock, then your current build seems fine.