mastercoms
Account Details
SteamID64 76561198046110893
SteamID3 [U:1:85845165]
SteamID32 STEAM_0:1:42922582
Country United States
Signed Up August 8, 2017
Last Posted September 16, 2025 at 9:02 AM
Posts 1575 (0.5 per day)
Game Settings
In-game Sensitivity
Windows Sensitivity
Raw Input 1
DPI
 
Resolution
 
Refresh Rate
 
Hardware Peripherals
Mouse  
Keyboard  
Mousepad  
Headphones  
Monitor  
1 2 3 4 5 ⋅⋅ 105
#160 Team Comtress 2 in Projects
HandymanPyrocool as hell!!
any details on the flame density mechanic? most fixes to it i've seen make it ramp down instead of resetting completely when losing contact and basing damage off the youngest particle instead of the oldest, im assuming this was tried and failed.

if you want a pyro player's opinion on it, i kinda get the punishing aspect of ramp-up resetting completely, i think it would work somewhat fine if it didnt reset randomly for no reason.

I think Pyro's role as an ambush class is critical to its effectiveness. Most crucial are the fractions of a second you have to apply as much damage and chaos as possible before a response. Giving Pyro a ramp-up with accuracy over time completely neuters this ability. It lowers Pyro's damage in his most crucial moments. Not to mention that density is not a good approximation for Pyro accuracy/damage. Flames pass through characters. Thus, its current state cannot be a good solution to the panic bind problem. I would much rather prefer a very specific and narrow fix to that exploit. It should not require reworking and ultimately nerfing an entire class's mechanics in every case to prevent an exploit.

Furthermore, the distance-based falloff was much better because it rewarded density in a much more straightforward way, while also addressing the many different problems that time-based falloff had in the past, and the new problems introduced with the new time-based falloff.

Also, as a side note, I do understand that Pyro is not primarily an ambush class in 6s or even in Highlander in the practical sense. Players are much more aware, and it's harder to get an effective flank off. However, catching an enemy in a favorable engagement for her is a type of "ambush" in a design sense, and can come in many different forms involving positioning, denial of response through airblast, etc, or a combination of these factors.

posted 1 month ago
#157 Team Comtress 2 in Projects

WIP launch update page: https://staging.mastercomfig-site.pages.dev/tc2/updates/blockbuster/

posted 1 month ago
#156 Team Comtress 2 in Projects

Just a lil bump on this thread, it's now on the new SDK and I'm trying to make a great experience that will hopefully slowly get into the base game, but may also act as a "staging" ground for changes. I'd be interested in making it useful as a promod too, given how long it will probably take to get changes into the base game.

It's not on Steam yet, but will be there eventually once out of early access.

Check out the updated OP: https://www.teamfortress.tv/56836/team-comtress-2/?page=1#1

posted 1 month ago
#3 Fake ping and other scummy server behavior in TF2 General Discussion

They could easily emulate the actual ping with the anti-DDoS tech that they use by caching the ping time to the actual server from the proxy node, and holding the response for a little longer based on that time. It's intentional what they're doing, the DDoS thing is a complete lie and non-issue.

posted 3 months ago
#53 ctap scripts banned in rgl in TF2 General Discussion
capnnofapnThe best way to make them accessible would be to include as an optional add on for mastercomms just like null movement, and you could even do the same for resupply binds. My apologies for asking you to do more work when you already do so much, but your website is super easy to use and I'm pretty sure almost everyone who is even interested in competitive play uses mastercomms already

I'm more asking from the context of a game feature, similar to how jump throws in CS2 were mentioned in this thread. What would people want the game to do and how would the game tell?

posted 3 months ago
#50 ctap scripts banned in rgl in TF2 General Discussion

I wonder, what would be the best way to make c-taps accessible? Because don't people want control over if they're c-tapping or not? What would the ideal knockback be? The theoretical maximum? Or a reasonable value of a normal c-tap?

posted 3 months ago
#2 sages updated configs in Customization
sagesimplicity of older configs

Maybe I should better advertise that there is both a ZIP version of mastercomfig available with the original comments and editable config files, as well as a plain autoexec.cfg version of mastercomfig.

posted 4 months ago
#19 I trolled my team in the official in TF2 General Discussion

also, this isn't trolling, this is inting/matchfixing, and you're not even doing it for money

posted 6 months ago
#15 I trolled my team in the official in TF2 General Discussion

what are you doing with your one life honestly, "trolling" in im...

posted 6 months ago
#19 I Think The 6v6 Meta Team Composition Is Flawed in TF2 General Discussion

I used to have a similar opinion but then I realized that the availability of certain classes in TF2 has no bearing on what should be available in 6s. It's just as much of an interesting game even pretending TF2 only has those 4 classes. Would the game appeal to more people if it had the class they main more? Maybe, but that's not the game that's been developed here. This is an entirely unique experience that happens to be hosted within TF2, focused on fast paced, arena DM and playing around uber. That's more than a sufficient meta-game to stand on its own. And I'd wish at this point we'd focus on streamlining the experience, since I think it would bring up more interesting decisions within play. Give up on bridging the gap, 6v6 NR is just not the same game as 6s, and if people want 6v6 NR, they can host their own formats.

posted 6 months ago
#8 with all due respect in TF2 General Discussion

Surely though, a mechanism for at least using the edit function to wipe each post clean would be possible, as would have been done manually?

posted 6 months ago
#6 Comp.tf down? in TF2 General Discussion

Seems down again?

EDIT: corbt is already aware, hopefully it'll be back up soon, thank you for the work on it

posted 6 months ago
#52 TF2 Promod in TF2 General Discussion
rmimo, this should be the base for promod
but the issue is that it is based on the 2018 leak
so the question is how hard it would be to transfer all of it to the new SDK

This is based on the new SDK.

dqzIs there some kind of coordinated effort for this? If a bunch of different developers are already creating their own "promod" forks in parallel without getting in touch with league admins / playerbase / each other, it would seem counterproductive to not do that in a more organized manner. Especially if we ever intend to run something like that in competetive.

If leagues (or really anyone else) want to contact me with requests, I can do my best to fulfill them.

posted 6 months ago
#45 TF2 Promod in TF2 General Discussion

Though it isn't going to expressly be a promod, I am working on https://mastercoms.itch.io/tc2 and hopefully it provides some degree of value to folks here

posted 6 months ago
#6 lf old tf2mate configs in Customization

wait but this was 4 years ago

posted 7 months ago
1 2 3 4 5 ⋅⋅ 105