but youre ok in my book smaka
Fat shaming
posted in
Off Topic
kuza Do you wake up each morning fighting with the choice of sucking dick or eating pussy?
no
but boypussy tho.............
[quote=kuza] Do you wake up each morning fighting with the choice of sucking dick or eating pussy? [/quote]
no
but boypussy tho.............
no
but boypussy tho.............
dellortboppetHonestly, I like these kind of threads, it gives the people something to talk about and debating and discussing is really cool as long as no one gets angry or heated. I personally would love a section on the forum for debates, the animation forum I used to regular at had one, and the members debated a numerous amount of controversial issues, like religion, gay marriage, the use of the word "nigga", legalizing marijuana, piracy, etc. It's another way for people to get to know each other.
I agree, most people see these threads as negative (I think back to when the documentary was released and we debated whether or not the cost of the high quality version was justified or not), but in fact they're probably the best way for people to develop their skills in debating, learn of the opinions of others (and perhaps incorporate some of those ideas into their own opinions) and many other things. I especially appreciate June's posts because he often brings out harsh opinions in a very blunt/rude manner, and while it perhaps isn't the most meaningful way to post it definitely is effective in starting debates.
heh i know people how have slept in the office for 2-3 days straight right now, and during work hours we are completely logged(since we charge based on man hours, and you'll definitely get fired if it's discovered you went and took a jog when you were suppose to be working)
And i know quite a few nurses who work absurd hours sometimes coming close to the 120 hour in a week mark. There's also the fact that people have kids, you can't exactly tell your SO "yea watch the kids all by yourself i'm gonna go hit the gym for the few hours a week that i'm actually home" The best i can think of is running to and from work(which if you commute like 6+ mils away isn't really plausible) It's probably possible but at the cost of missing time with your children, or SO is a pretty crazy cost.
I personally don't have this problem at all, i work and go to school the rest of the time is my own, but if i was employed full time(getting accounts instead of doing grunt work) and i had a family i could easily see my self dropping 10-15 pounds of muscle.
[quote=dellort][quote=boppet]
Honestly, I like these kind of threads, it gives the people something to talk about and debating and discussing is really cool as long as no one gets angry or heated. I personally would love a section on the forum for debates, the animation forum I used to regular at had one, and the members debated a numerous amount of controversial issues, like religion, gay marriage, the use of the word "nigga", legalizing marijuana, piracy, etc. It's another way for people to get to know each other.
[/quote]
I agree, most people see these threads as negative (I think back to when the documentary was released and we debated whether or not the cost of the high quality version was justified or not), but in fact they're probably the best way for people to develop their skills in debating, learn of the opinions of others (and perhaps incorporate some of those ideas into their own opinions) and many other things. I especially appreciate June's posts because he often brings out harsh opinions in a very blunt/rude manner, and while it perhaps isn't the most meaningful way to post it definitely is effective in starting debates.[/quote]
heh i know people how have slept in the office for 2-3 days straight right now, and during work hours we are completely logged(since we charge based on man hours, and you'll definitely get fired if it's discovered you went and took a jog when you were suppose to be working)
And i know quite a few nurses who work absurd hours sometimes coming close to the 120 hour in a week mark. There's also the fact that people have kids, you can't exactly tell your SO "yea watch the kids all by yourself i'm gonna go hit the gym for the few hours a week that i'm actually home" The best i can think of is running to and from work(which if you commute like 6+ mils away isn't really plausible) It's probably possible but at the cost of missing time with your children, or SO is a pretty crazy cost.
I personally don't have this problem at all, i work and go to school the rest of the time is my own, but if i was employed full time(getting accounts instead of doing grunt work) and i had a family i could easily see my self dropping 10-15 pounds of muscle.
Honestly, I like these kind of threads, it gives the people something to talk about and debating and discussing is really cool as long as no one gets angry or heated. I personally would love a section on the forum for debates, the animation forum I used to regular at had one, and the members debated a numerous amount of controversial issues, like religion, gay marriage, the use of the word "nigga", legalizing marijuana, piracy, etc. It's another way for people to get to know each other.
[/quote]
I agree, most people see these threads as negative (I think back to when the documentary was released and we debated whether or not the cost of the high quality version was justified or not), but in fact they're probably the best way for people to develop their skills in debating, learn of the opinions of others (and perhaps incorporate some of those ideas into their own opinions) and many other things. I especially appreciate June's posts because he often brings out harsh opinions in a very blunt/rude manner, and while it perhaps isn't the most meaningful way to post it definitely is effective in starting debates.[/quote]
heh i know people how have slept in the office for 2-3 days straight right now, and during work hours we are completely logged(since we charge based on man hours, and you'll definitely get fired if it's discovered you went and took a jog when you were suppose to be working)
And i know quite a few nurses who work absurd hours sometimes coming close to the 120 hour in a week mark. There's also the fact that people have kids, you can't exactly tell your SO "yea watch the kids all by yourself i'm gonna go hit the gym for the few hours a week that i'm actually home" The best i can think of is running to and from work(which if you commute like 6+ mils away isn't really plausible) It's probably possible but at the cost of missing time with your children, or SO is a pretty crazy cost.
I personally don't have this problem at all, i work and go to school the rest of the time is my own, but if i was employed full time(getting accounts instead of doing grunt work) and i had a family i could easily see my self dropping 10-15 pounds of muscle.
kuzasmakersI feel my above post might be taken too harshly. My stance on LGBT things is no secret; I vehemently disagree with the lifestyle. I do, however, know several people in those categories who I would classify as friends. I don't hate them or talk down to them for their lifestyle as it's not my place to do so. I don't agree with it, and if asked, I will respond as such.
you think being gay is a lifestyle choice? When did you choose to be straight? Do you wake up each morning fighting with the choice of sucking dick or eating pussy? cause I sure don't.
The worst part is that you're old enough to know better, to inform yourself, especially when you have friends who have lived through this.
Well... Smaka did start playing medic this season. Who knows maybe another season or two smaka could be going in for sexual re-evaluation.
[quote=kuza][quote=smakers]I feel my above post might be taken too harshly. My stance on LGBT things is no secret; I vehemently disagree with the lifestyle. I do, however, know several people in those categories who I would classify as friends. I don't hate them or talk down to them for their lifestyle as it's not my place to do so. I don't agree with it, and if asked, I will respond as such.[/quote]
you think being gay is a lifestyle choice? When did you choose to be straight? Do you wake up each morning fighting with the choice of sucking dick or eating pussy? cause I sure don't.
The worst part is that you're old enough to know better, to inform yourself, especially when you have friends who have lived through this.[/quote]
Well... Smaka did start playing medic this season. Who knows maybe another season or two smaka could be going in for sexual re-evaluation.
you think being gay is a lifestyle choice? When did you choose to be straight? Do you wake up each morning fighting with the choice of sucking dick or eating pussy? cause I sure don't.
The worst part is that you're old enough to know better, to inform yourself, especially when you have friends who have lived through this.[/quote]
Well... Smaka did start playing medic this season. Who knows maybe another season or two smaka could be going in for sexual re-evaluation.
Smaka you are biologically bald and color blind. My stance is that I disagree with you because biologically you should be able to perceive color and have a full head of hair. Thus I disagree with your lifestyle.
Smaka you are biologically bald and color blind. My stance is that I disagree with you because biologically you should be able to perceive color and have a full head of hair. Thus I disagree with your lifestyle.
I have color-folliculodisphoria. I demand you refer to me as normal.
I have color-folliculodisphoria. I demand you refer to me as normal.
some straight couples cant make kids either i hope you dont vehemently disagree with the lifestyle of guys with low sperm motility or girls with ovarian cancer cause that would be a dick move
some straight couples cant make kids either i hope you dont vehemently disagree with the lifestyle of guys with low sperm motility or girls with ovarian cancer cause that would be a dick move
low motility esports
edit: I want to contribute more to this thread than that but I think everyone is dumb and wrong and im an angry shit so I wont
low motility esports
edit: I want to contribute more to this thread than that but I think everyone is dumb and wrong and im an angry shit so I wont
edit: I want to contribute more to this thread than that but I think everyone is dumb and wrong and im an angry shit so I wont
There's no lifestyle to disagree with if people are hardcoded with something, Smaka. It'd be like someone referring to your colorblindnesswhatever as a lifestyle choice and refusing to refer to you as a human being because they disagreed with you. You can preach being respectful of Waffleb despite not "agreeing with her lifestyle" but you're being pretty fucking rude when you decide to call her a male when she identifies as female. That's not respect, that's a complete disregard for somebody else's beliefs, thoughts and feelings.
There's no lifestyle to disagree with if people are hardcoded with something, Smaka. It'd be like someone referring to your colorblindnesswhatever as a lifestyle choice and refusing to refer to you as a human being because they disagreed with you. You can preach being respectful of Waffleb despite not "agreeing with her lifestyle" but you're being pretty fucking rude when you decide to call her a male when she identifies as female. That's not respect, that's a complete disregard for somebody else's beliefs, thoughts and feelings.
d_bsome straight couples cant make kids either i hope you dont vehemently disagree with the lifestyle of guys with low sperm motility or girls with ovarian cancer cause that would be a dick move
Along the same line, what about priest, nuns, and monks? Or me, who has babysat way too much to ever think about procreation?
[quote=d_b]some straight couples cant make kids either i hope you dont vehemently disagree with the lifestyle of guys with low sperm motility or girls with ovarian cancer cause that would be a dick move[/quote]
Along the same line, what about priest, nuns, and monks? Or me, who has babysat way too much to ever think about procreation?
Along the same line, what about priest, nuns, and monks? Or me, who has babysat way too much to ever think about procreation?
ThomasduhtraindellortboppetHonestly, I like these kind of threads, it gives the people something to talk about and debating and discussing is really cool as long as no one gets angry or heated. I personally would love a section on the forum for debates, the animation forum I used to regular at had one, and the members debated a numerous amount of controversial issues, like religion, gay marriage, the use of the word "nigga", legalizing marijuana, piracy, etc. It's another way for people to get to know each other.
I agree, most people see these threads as negative (I think back to when the documentary was released and we debated whether or not the cost of the high quality version was justified or not), but in fact they're probably the best way for people to develop their skills in debating, learn of the opinions of others (and perhaps incorporate some of those ideas into their own opinions) and many other things. I especially appreciate June's posts because he often brings out harsh opinions in a very blunt/rude manner, and while it perhaps isn't the most meaningful way to post it definitely is effective in starting debates.
heh i know people how have slept in the office for 2-3 days straight right now, and during work hours we are completely logged(since we charge based on man hours, and you'll definitely get fired if it's discovered you went and took a jog when you were suppose to be working)
And i know quite a few nurses who work absurd hours sometimes coming close to the 120 hour in a week mark. There's also the fact that people have kids, you can't exactly tell your SO "yea watch the kids all by yourself i'm gonna go hit the gym for the few hours a week that i'm actually home" The best i can think of is running to and from work(which if you commute like 6+ mils away isn't really plausible) It's probably possible but at the cost of missing time with your children, or SO is a pretty crazy cost.
I personally don't have this problem at all, i work and go to school the rest of the time is my own, but if i was employed full time(getting accounts instead of doing grunt work) and i had a family i could easily see my self dropping 10-15 pounds of muscle.
I mentioned this in another thread a long time ago, but making changes towards a healthier lifestyle doesn't have to involve running 6+ miles or hitting the gym for a few hours each day. It can honestly mean doing a few squats while waiting for the printer at the office to print out the papers you're waiting on, or doing a few short sets of crunches in bed before you fall asleep. I understand some people have work schedules and other commitments which make it extremely difficult to find time to exercise, but when these small steps can literally be accomplished in seconds there really is no excuse. Don't underestimate the effect that low numbers of reps of exercises have over a long duration of time. Even just five extra minutes of walking a day for someone who works long hours at a desk job can make a difference.
[quote=Thomasduhtrain][quote=dellort][quote=boppet]
Honestly, I like these kind of threads, it gives the people something to talk about and debating and discussing is really cool as long as no one gets angry or heated. I personally would love a section on the forum for debates, the animation forum I used to regular at had one, and the members debated a numerous amount of controversial issues, like religion, gay marriage, the use of the word "nigga", legalizing marijuana, piracy, etc. It's another way for people to get to know each other.
[/quote]
I agree, most people see these threads as negative (I think back to when the documentary was released and we debated whether or not the cost of the high quality version was justified or not), but in fact they're probably the best way for people to develop their skills in debating, learn of the opinions of others (and perhaps incorporate some of those ideas into their own opinions) and many other things. I especially appreciate June's posts because he often brings out harsh opinions in a very blunt/rude manner, and while it perhaps isn't the most meaningful way to post it definitely is effective in starting debates.[/quote]
heh i know people how have slept in the office for 2-3 days straight right now, and during work hours we are completely logged(since we charge based on man hours, and you'll definitely get fired if it's discovered you went and took a jog when you were suppose to be working)
And i know quite a few nurses who work absurd hours sometimes coming close to the 120 hour in a week mark. There's also the fact that people have kids, you can't exactly tell your SO "yea watch the kids all by yourself i'm gonna go hit the gym for the few hours a week that i'm actually home" The best i can think of is running to and from work(which if you commute like 6+ mils away isn't really plausible) It's probably possible but at the cost of missing time with your children, or SO is a pretty crazy cost.
I personally don't have this problem at all, i work and go to school the rest of the time is my own, but if i was employed full time(getting accounts instead of doing grunt work) and i had a family i could easily see my self dropping 10-15 pounds of muscle.[/quote]
I mentioned this in another thread a long time ago, but making changes towards a healthier lifestyle doesn't have to involve running 6+ miles or hitting the gym for a few hours each day. It can honestly mean doing a few squats while waiting for the printer at the office to print out the papers you're waiting on, or doing a few short sets of crunches in bed before you fall asleep. I understand some people have work schedules and other commitments which make it extremely difficult to find time to exercise, but when these small steps can literally be accomplished in seconds there really is no excuse. Don't underestimate the effect that low numbers of reps of exercises have over a long duration of time. Even just [i]five extra minutes[/i] of walking a day for someone who works long hours at a desk job can make a difference.
Honestly, I like these kind of threads, it gives the people something to talk about and debating and discussing is really cool as long as no one gets angry or heated. I personally would love a section on the forum for debates, the animation forum I used to regular at had one, and the members debated a numerous amount of controversial issues, like religion, gay marriage, the use of the word "nigga", legalizing marijuana, piracy, etc. It's another way for people to get to know each other.
[/quote]
I agree, most people see these threads as negative (I think back to when the documentary was released and we debated whether or not the cost of the high quality version was justified or not), but in fact they're probably the best way for people to develop their skills in debating, learn of the opinions of others (and perhaps incorporate some of those ideas into their own opinions) and many other things. I especially appreciate June's posts because he often brings out harsh opinions in a very blunt/rude manner, and while it perhaps isn't the most meaningful way to post it definitely is effective in starting debates.[/quote]
heh i know people how have slept in the office for 2-3 days straight right now, and during work hours we are completely logged(since we charge based on man hours, and you'll definitely get fired if it's discovered you went and took a jog when you were suppose to be working)
And i know quite a few nurses who work absurd hours sometimes coming close to the 120 hour in a week mark. There's also the fact that people have kids, you can't exactly tell your SO "yea watch the kids all by yourself i'm gonna go hit the gym for the few hours a week that i'm actually home" The best i can think of is running to and from work(which if you commute like 6+ mils away isn't really plausible) It's probably possible but at the cost of missing time with your children, or SO is a pretty crazy cost.
I personally don't have this problem at all, i work and go to school the rest of the time is my own, but if i was employed full time(getting accounts instead of doing grunt work) and i had a family i could easily see my self dropping 10-15 pounds of muscle.[/quote]
I mentioned this in another thread a long time ago, but making changes towards a healthier lifestyle doesn't have to involve running 6+ miles or hitting the gym for a few hours each day. It can honestly mean doing a few squats while waiting for the printer at the office to print out the papers you're waiting on, or doing a few short sets of crunches in bed before you fall asleep. I understand some people have work schedules and other commitments which make it extremely difficult to find time to exercise, but when these small steps can literally be accomplished in seconds there really is no excuse. Don't underestimate the effect that low numbers of reps of exercises have over a long duration of time. Even just [i]five extra minutes[/i] of walking a day for someone who works long hours at a desk job can make a difference.
smakersI think I was pretty clear, Renhet. I very well understand they're somewhat "hard coded" as you say. I understand a man with a homosexual predisposition cannot force himself to be sexually attracted to women just as I cannot force myself to be sexually attracted to men. I get it. I just don't agree with that lifestyle--it is biologically wrong. Do I shun people for it? No, I think they're free to live how they want, but they know it's not "normal" and it's not biologically correct. I respect your opinion, and it's fine that you don't want to use the word 'disagree'. I do, however.
So at the start of the thread you were all high and mighty about not judging other people, yet you're the biggest hypocrite here.
[quote=smakers]I think I was pretty clear, Renhet. I very well understand they're somewhat "hard coded" as you say. I understand a man with a homosexual predisposition cannot force himself to be sexually attracted to women just as I cannot force myself to be sexually attracted to men. I get it. I just don't agree with that lifestyle--it is biologically wrong. Do I shun people for it? No, I think they're free to live how they want, but they know it's not "normal" and it's not biologically correct. I respect your opinion, and it's fine that you don't want to use the word 'disagree'. I do, however.[/quote]
So at the start of the thread you were all high and mighty about not judging other people, yet you're the biggest hypocrite here.
So at the start of the thread you were all high and mighty about not judging other people, yet you're the biggest hypocrite here.
I'm not preaching anything, Renhet. I will refer to him as male because, biologically, he is male. Why is it rude? I'm not disregarding his beliefs, thoughts, and feelings--I'm simply not disregarding my own, either.
I'm not preaching anything, Renhet. I will refer to him as male because, biologically, he is male. Why is it rude? I'm not disregarding his beliefs, thoughts, and feelings--I'm simply not disregarding my own, either.
Alright since we're on this topic. What are your thoughts of Falon fox (transvestite male) competing in martial arts against naturally born women?
Alright since we're on this topic. What are your thoughts of Falon fox (transvestite male) competing in martial arts against naturally born women?
variation is good for the long term survival of the species brosephs you guys aren't taking the long view on this one
when earth gets invaded by aliens in 2000 years who are prejudiced against fit women and people who look like dudes you're going to look PRETTY SILLY when transfemales and fat chicks are able to save the human race
variation is good for the long term survival of the species brosephs you guys aren't taking the long view on this one
when earth gets invaded by aliens in 2000 years who are prejudiced against fit women and people who look like dudes you're going to look PRETTY SILLY when transfemales and fat chicks are able to save the human race
when earth gets invaded by aliens in 2000 years who are prejudiced against fit women and people who look like dudes you're going to look PRETTY SILLY when transfemales and fat chicks are able to save the human race
No, kuza. I'm not judging them, and I'm not trying to be high and mighty, despite the king reference. I stated it's not biologically correct, nor is it considered normal. Where am I judging anyone? How am I being hypocritical?
No, kuza. I'm not judging them, and I'm not trying to be high and mighty, despite the king reference. I stated it's not biologically correct, nor is it considered normal. Where am I judging anyone? How am I being hypocritical?
pine_beetleAlright since we're on this topic. What are your thoughts of Falon fox (transvestite male) competing in martial arts against naturally born women?
Sure.
http://jumptheturnstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/transgender-fallon-fox-300x300.jpg
[quote=pine_beetle]Alright since we're on this topic. What are your thoughts of Falon fox (transvestite male) competing in martial arts against naturally born women?[/quote]
Sure.
[img]http://jumptheturnstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/transgender-fallon-fox-300x300.jpg[/img]
Sure.
[img]http://jumptheturnstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/transgender-fallon-fox-300x300.jpg[/img]
smakersNo, kuza. I'm not judging them, and I'm not trying to be high and mighty, despite the king reference. I stated it's not biologically correct, nor is it considered normal. Where am I judging anyone? How am I being hypocritical?
What do you mean by correct? And what does it matter if it's normal?
[quote=smakers]No, kuza. I'm not judging them, and I'm not trying to be high and mighty, despite the king reference. I stated it's not biologically correct, nor is it considered normal. Where am I judging anyone? How am I being hypocritical?[/quote]
What do you mean by correct? And what does it matter if it's normal?
What do you mean by correct? And what does it matter if it's normal?
the main reason its important to differentiate between trans women and genetic women is that some trans females are good at video games and absolutely no birth women are
the main reason its important to differentiate between trans women and genetic women is that some trans females are good at video games and absolutely no birth women are
mustardoverlordthe main reason its important to differentiate between trans women and genetic women is that some trans females are good at video games and absolutely no birth women are
shit, you took the words right out of my mouth.
[quote=mustardoverlord]the main reason its important to differentiate between trans women and genetic women is that some trans females are good at video games and absolutely no birth women are[/quote]
shit, you took the words right out of my mouth.
shit, you took the words right out of my mouth.
Biologically correct as in, biologically capable of producing offspring. Obviously there are instances where it can't happen even when the biological requirements are met (male + female having sex).
It doesn't matter if it's normal.
Biologically correct as in, biologically capable of producing offspring. Obviously there are instances where it can't happen even when the biological requirements are met (male + female having sex).
It doesn't matter if it's normal.
It doesn't matter if it's normal.
smakersI'm not preaching anything, Renhet. I will refer to him as male because, biologically, he is male. Why is it rude? I'm not disregarding his beliefs, thoughts, and feelings--I'm simply not disregarding my own, either.
You are disregarding how she feels entirely. Do you know what respect is? Respect is not calling an individual something they don't want to be called. Right now you're acting like it's respectful to call a black gentleman a nigger because you don't believe in a black lifestyle.
She identifies as female, and if you want to consider yourself respectful with any decency you will refer to her as a female.
[quote=smakers]I'm not preaching anything, Renhet. I will refer to him as male because, biologically, he is male. Why is it rude? I'm not disregarding his beliefs, thoughts, and feelings--I'm simply not disregarding my own, either.[/quote]
You are disregarding how she feels entirely. Do you know what respect is? Respect is not calling an individual something they don't want to be called. Right now you're acting like it's respectful to call a black gentleman a nigger because you don't believe in a black lifestyle.
She identifies as female, and if you want to consider yourself respectful with any decency you will refer to her as a female.
You are disregarding how she feels entirely. Do you know what respect is? Respect is not calling an individual something they don't want to be called. Right now you're acting like it's respectful to call a black gentleman a nigger because you don't believe in a black lifestyle.
She identifies as female, and if you want to consider yourself respectful with any decency you will refer to her as a female.
This thread just completed a full cycle. Back to fat women because they're fat*.
Pregnant*
This thread just completed a full cycle. Back to fat women because they're fat*.
Pregnant*
Pregnant*
RenhetRight now you're acting like it's respectful to call a black gentleman a nigger because you don't believe in a black lifestyle.
She identifies as female, and if you want to consider yourself respectful with any decency you will refer to her as a female.
WE DID IT
WE FOUND TUMBLR MOUNTAIN
[quote=Renhet]Right now you're acting like it's respectful to call a black gentleman a nigger because you don't believe in a black lifestyle.
She identifies as female, and if you want to consider yourself respectful with any decency you will refer to her as a female.[/quote]
WE DID IT
WE FOUND TUMBLR MOUNTAIN
She identifies as female, and if you want to consider yourself respectful with any decency you will refer to her as a female.[/quote]
WE DID IT
WE FOUND TUMBLR MOUNTAIN
smakersI think I was pretty clear, Renhet. I very well understand they're somewhat "hard coded" as you say. I understand a man with a homosexual predisposition cannot force himself to be sexually attracted to women just as I cannot force myself to be sexually attracted to men. I get it. I just don't agree with that lifestyle--it is biologically wrong. Do I shun people for it? No, I think they're free to live how they want, but they know it's not "normal" and it's not biologically correct. I respect your opinion, and it's fine that you don't want to use the word 'disagree'. I do, however.
So the reason that you are anti-LGBT is because it's biologically incorrect since they will not produce offspring? Then you would hate the fact that my wife and I have chose to never have children. Does that mean it's a biologically incorrect lifestyle too? So, should we basically just push out as many children as possible?
I also wouldn't say biologically "wrong" If anything, I would think that incorrect would be a better choice. When you use right or wrong, you get into a bad spot since so many things were once considered wrong were later considered fine. Under the same thought, when you say something in "normal" will not always stay that way.
Edit- fixing a few auto-corrects
[quote=smakers]I think I was pretty clear, Renhet. I very well understand they're somewhat "hard coded" as you say. I understand a man with a homosexual predisposition cannot force himself to be sexually attracted to women just as I cannot force myself to be sexually attracted to men. I get it. I just don't agree with that lifestyle--it is biologically wrong. Do I shun people for it? No, I think they're free to live how they want, but they know it's not "normal" and it's not biologically correct. I respect your opinion, and it's fine that you don't want to use the word 'disagree'. I do, however.[/quote]
So the reason that you are anti-LGBT is because it's biologically incorrect since they will not produce offspring? Then you would hate the fact that my wife and I have chose to never have children. Does that mean it's a biologically incorrect lifestyle too? So, should we basically just push out as many children as possible?
I also wouldn't say biologically "wrong" If anything, I would think that incorrect would be a better choice. When you use right or wrong, you get into a bad spot since so many things were once considered wrong were later considered fine. Under the same thought, when you say something in "normal" will not always stay that way.
Edit- fixing a few auto-corrects
So the reason that you are anti-LGBT is because it's biologically incorrect since they will not produce offspring? Then you would hate the fact that my wife and I have chose to never have children. Does that mean it's a biologically incorrect lifestyle too? So, should we basically just push out as many children as possible?
I also wouldn't say biologically "wrong" If anything, I would think that incorrect would be a better choice. When you use right or wrong, you get into a bad spot since so many things were once considered wrong were later considered fine. Under the same thought, when you say something in "normal" will not always stay that way.
Edit- fixing a few auto-corrects
i always though smaka was a cool dude cuz he looked like kyle gass and kage rules
i always though smaka was a cool dude cuz he looked like kyle gass and kage rules
RenhetsmakersI'm not preaching anything, Renhet. I will refer to him as male because, biologically, he is male. Why is it rude? I'm not disregarding his beliefs, thoughts, and feelings--I'm simply not disregarding my own, either.You are disregarding how she feels entirely. Do you know what respect is? Respect is not calling an individual something they don't want to be called. Right now you're acting like it's respectful to call a black gentleman a ****** because you don't believe in a black lifestyle.
She identifies as female, and if you want to consider yourself respectful with any decency you will refer to her as a female.
That comparison doesn't even make sense. Your opinion is that I am being disrespectful because I don't call him what he desires to be called. I don't see where respect has anything to do with it. I am not calling him a disparaging, racially-charged word. I am calling him what he is; a male human being.
[quote=Renhet][quote=smakers]I'm not preaching anything, Renhet. I will refer to him as male because, biologically, he is male. Why is it rude? I'm not disregarding his beliefs, thoughts, and feelings--I'm simply not disregarding my own, either.[/quote]
You are disregarding how she feels entirely. Do you know what respect is? Respect is not calling an individual something they don't want to be called. Right now you're acting like it's respectful to call a black gentleman a ****** because you don't believe in a black lifestyle.
She identifies as female, and if you want to consider yourself respectful with any decency you will refer to her as a female.[/quote]
That comparison doesn't even make sense. Your opinion is that I am being disrespectful because I don't call him what he desires to be called. I don't see where respect has anything to do with it. I am not calling him a disparaging, racially-charged word. I am calling him what he is; a male human being.
You are disregarding how she feels entirely. Do you know what respect is? Respect is not calling an individual something they don't want to be called. Right now you're acting like it's respectful to call a black gentleman a ****** because you don't believe in a black lifestyle.
She identifies as female, and if you want to consider yourself respectful with any decency you will refer to her as a female.[/quote]
That comparison doesn't even make sense. Your opinion is that I am being disrespectful because I don't call him what he desires to be called. I don't see where respect has anything to do with it. I am not calling him a disparaging, racially-charged word. I am calling him what he is; a male human being.
smakers
That comparison doesn't even make sense. Your opinion is that I am being disrespectful because I don't call him what he desires to be called. I don't see where respect has anything to do with it. I am not calling him a disparaging, racially-charged word. I am calling him what he is; a male human being.
So I can call you a white, ignorant bigot and not be disrecpectful?
[quote=smakers]
That comparison doesn't even make sense. Your opinion is that I am being disrespectful because I don't call him what he desires to be called. I don't see where respect has anything to do with it. I am not calling him a disparaging, racially-charged word. I am calling him what he is; a male human being.[/quote] So I can call you a white, ignorant bigot and not be disrecpectful?
That comparison doesn't even make sense. Your opinion is that I am being disrespectful because I don't call him what he desires to be called. I don't see where respect has anything to do with it. I am not calling him a disparaging, racially-charged word. I am calling him what he is; a male human being.[/quote] So I can call you a white, ignorant bigot and not be disrecpectful?
This thread has been locked.