You're a cool guy. Your article has loads of spelling and grammar errors.
You're wesome.

that's not constructive feedback, you're just being a douchebag

Fine twat-monkey.
Sadly, criticism is subjectively interpreted. What you view as constructive can come off as insulting to the receiver of said criticism. So yes, there are way to more gingerly state things, but they are in no way going to assist the receiver's interpretation.
And similar to my comment, you're just being a douchebag. Please enjoy your fuck-tarded +frags for a hypocritical cunt post.

ur real rude u no that

You sir, need to relax.

now thats what i call edgy

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

http://static.tumblr.com/tjv6lw7/ZmFm8uwcb/muppets_-_flailing_kermit.gif

Very good. Many people could learn from this, even a lot of the people who partially dedicate themselves to giving feedback to map threads on tf2maps.

I +fragged for twat-monkey and pointing out the obvious hypocrisy
did tftv turn into tumbler all of a sudden? people getting their panties twisted way to fast

pretentious hipsters everywhere...

I think you need to look up the words "hypocrisy" and "hipster", I recommend this

http://www.myenglisch.de/oxford-englisch/grafik/duden.jpg

Ws post was hypocritical (in my opinion) and Drploxo pointed it out, not sure how I miss used the word hypocrisy there, but please do enlighten me.
oh and please talk slowly and loader than normal since, well you know I am a foreigner and all that... oh wait

W was pointing out how DrPloxo was being a douchebag. Which he was. In order for this to be hypocritical, W himself would have to be a jackass to everyone himself. Which he isn't. Imo.

~pointing out that someone's being a douchebag doesn't make you a douchebag unless you go the extra mile and call them a neopet negg~

W said that Drploxos post wasn't constructive criticism while his wasn't either.. tada hypocrisy...
arguing on the interwebs is a bad idea

There are posts that don't deserve constructive criticism because the poster was not asking for it. DrPloxo's post is an example of such posts.

http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png

And the true tragedy is that it's the classic "sandwich."
Good thing. Bad thing. Good thing. Constructive criticisms first big, "This is gonna make sure nobody gets upset," pile of shit.
Thanks for proving my angry post right. You guys are clearly next level.

Secondarily, kinch, the article is a good intention, definitely, but some people don't take criticism.

http://i.imgur.com/hXy2f1U.gif

I didn't. Got drunk, mad and probably goofed.
The explanation of the first post is:
I like Kinch. The article has a lot of errors but it's pretty helpful. I put it into the compliment sandwich format because some times it doesn't matter how you say things, people can always not be happy about them. The article says this itself right after the "DESCRIBE DON'T JUDGE," header.
The Second post:
Since my first post was an overpackaged bit of criticism, it seemed like I was being trolled. And . . . .being drunk, mad. I also thought twat-monkey was funny iirc.

Pretty ironic how all this spawned from a post linking to an article on constructive feedback.

I thought irony was supposed to mean it was unexpected B)

sort of

it means the opposite of what is to be expected

I try to be helpful and you guys go and do THIS?

http://dailyoftheday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/vxKOi.gif

Now I see why Ploxo was apologizing last night... Oh well.

give ploxo a break, I pretty much agree with him for the most part. I really wish we could have unfiltered feedback but this topic is not doing great for my hopes. don't blow things out of proportion guys.

I know, he apologized to me on Slin's stream the other night, so we good :)

Plus I adore Red Pandas, so here's another one:

https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/4567672320/h0CFD1127/