holy shit!

edit : just saw the response time, now im not as hyped but also the fact that i probably wouldn't need such a large monitor

also WAAAAY too expensive

that will be crazy but sure wont be worth my money

i would be more interested in getting a 120hz 4k oled than something like that most likely

isn't response time as important as refresh rate for competitive fps's ?

It is

Having a 200Hz. refresh rate is really only useful if you can maintain that high of a framerate, and I don't know of anybody in the TF.TV community that walks around with 400 FPS constant.

unless seriously rich, i don't see how anyone could justify purchasing this..
not even if the response time was way lower.
but i guess it's a good indication of what's ahead of us in terms of monitors?

You just can't lol, tf2 engine is so "well" optimized that not even NASA computers would be able to do it.

ah yes. gaming tv

will wait 6 years for this to become the standard and buy one for my fridge or something

acer blows so iunno about this

Only issue is because you have to use display port for 4K they also have really shit response time

oled is still very expensive. It will be great when those come down in prices and start being implemented more widely.

display port shouldn't be an issue. it's the best port on any consumer tv / monitor

HAHAHAHA

good lord. 200+ FPS constant in TF2 let alone at 2560x1080. And the $1200 usd price tag

GOOD LUCK BOIZ

I don't understand the obsession with large monitors when u sit 2 feet away from it, its hard enough to see peripherals with an average lcd. at least for competitive gaming I don't think large monitors help at all. I'd buy a 200hz 24" (or smaller, I prefer smaller monitors than 24 tbh)

this one would be pretty sick for racing games I think. 12ms response time sounds disgusting but manufacturers lie about response time anyway, I highly doubt 24" 144hz asus or benq lcd is 1ms, they could just be telling the truth on this monitor lmao. anyways cool to see this but definitely not for me

& I would not trade the fw900 for this or anything atm pharoah^^

yuki confirmed polish?

Nah, he's just really into Polish animation, a Polaboo.

polish background, old surname was russian

go figure. nice derail boys

It is a strange trend seeing 27 inch and above monitors being heavily marketed as gaming monitors.

I would like to try something like this out for the fov gain.

I've seen some people test the 1ms monitors agasint crt's using a high speed camera and usually the non crt's have poor grey to grey performance.

A 1ms 144hz+ VA or IPS 24 inch panel would be nice

modern VA and IPS have inherently bad GTG performance though

maybe in the future with a version that targets better response times, but nowadays the only IPS 144Hz panels are ones that are overclocked, and the refresh rate is there but since GTG is so poor it's almost worthless

Also the difference between 120 and 144hz for me is not noticeable at all, so I doubt that having 54hz more will make a difference for anyone.
Respond time on this monitor is pretty shit - it's like playing tf2 with 7 years old cpu but brand new powerful gpu - nosense. Not even going to say a word about the price.

Very true, poor speed, excellent color reproduction.

Speaking of overclockable panels. The Wasabi Mango UHD420 (ebay) is a 4k panel, for $800 ish that can be overclocked (reliably) to 120hz when downsized to 1080p, which is pretty nuts in itself. So theoretically if you wanted a big monitor for content consumption, and a monitor for casual ish pc gaming, you could just set your resolution lower and set it to not rescale your resolution up so it essentially is a lil 1080p 120 hz monitor surrounded by a sea of black bars ha.
Interesting in theory.

I have to disagree with you here from personal experience. If you see them next to each other, or are used to a certain refresh rate, the jumps are easily identifiable(from my experience), Both 120 - 144 and 144 to 160.

Going from 144hz to 200hz for an extra $950 is really not worth it, and if you want to play on native resolution you might need to upgrade your parts so that's even more money

The fov must be pretty sick with this though. would be fun to play with for a bit, although i couldn't see myself dropping $1200 on it. I doubt monitors such as this will ever become mainstream consumer grade products either.

Even if your monitor can display in 200Hz, what connection supports more than 144Hz @ 21:9?
For me it seems like it's something that is good on paper but you can't use it since you are limited or bottlenecked by other components, aka the connnection (HDMI, DVI or Dport)

Typically speaking the 1ms gtg is measured at the top of the monitor and the gray level used vary heavily. That said both the asus and benq 144Hz montiors can get under 1ms gtg with some really low gray level to a very high gray level in the top 1/3 of the monitor.

-edit-
Also this thread reminded me to post a question to the blurbuster forums about monitor overclocking. If anyone here happens to know.
http://forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2417