In-game, 1280 x 720 feels WAY smoother than 1920 x 1080 even when I'm on single-player mode netting over 500 FPS. Help? I want to have my game feeling smooth with my game being good-looking.
Custom Folder:
Show Content
CFGs:
Autoexec (Comanglia's Mid-Quality PC CFG w/ some non-FPS related parts removed): http://pastebin.com/zfnj81KM
Other Commands: http://pastebin.com/G2vpcnGA
Net Settings: http://pastebin.com/THbTMaEB
No Explosion Smoke Script: http://pastebin.com/h2gp6HsJ
Launch Options: http://pastebin.com/BXihETJ8
Also Includes:
FlameHUD, Custom Hitsound, No Soundscapes, and some Training Maps.
Specs:
Show Content
- Intel Pentium G3258 OC'd to 4.3 GHz
- AMD Radeon R9 270
- 128GB SSD
- MSi Z97 PC Mate Mobo
- EVGA 500B PSU
- 1TB HDD (My TF2 is on here)
- ASUS VG236H 2ms Response Time Monitor (OC'd to 74.5 Hz W/ patched HDMI frequency)
- Windows 10
Benchmarks:
Show Content
-default:benchmark1.dem2639 frames 31.328 seconds 84.24 fps (11.87 ms/f) 10.972 fps variability
benchmark2.dem4843 frames 55.539 seconds 87.20 fps (11.47 ms/f) 13.960 fps variability
-autoconfig w/ Multicore Rendering:benchmark1.dem2639 frames 31.782 seconds 83.04 fps (12.04 ms/f) 9.972 fps variability
benchmark2.dem4843 frames 53.097 seconds 91.21 fps (10.96 ms/f) 12.610 fps variability
-autoconfig w/ Comanglia's Cinema Config:benchmark1.dem2639 frames 36.848 seconds 71.62 fps (13.96 ms/f) 4.975 fps variability
benchmark2.dem4843 frames 60.457 seconds 80.11 fps (12.48 ms/f) 10.065 fps variability
-autoconfig w/ Comanglia's High Quality PCs Config:benchmark1.dem2639 frames 20.312 seconds 129.93 fps ( 7.70 ms/f) 10.203 fps variability
benchmark2.dem4843 frames 39.906 seconds 121.36 fps ( 8.24 ms/f) 17.940 fps variability
-autoconfig w/ Comanglia's Mid-Quality PCs Config:benchmark1.dem2639 frames 19.749 seconds 133.63 fps ( 7.48 ms/f) 9.994 fps variability
benchmark2.dem4843 frames 38.221 seconds 126.71 fps ( 7.89 ms/f) 18.868 fps variability
-autoconfig w/ R4ndom's Config:benchmark1.dem2639 frames 19.356 seconds 136.34 fps ( 7.33 ms/f) 10.541 fps variability
benchmark2.dem4843 frames 38.651 seconds 125.30 fps ( 7.98 ms/f) 18.389 fps variability
Optimizations:
Show Content
In-game, 1280 x 720 feels WAY smoother than 1920 x 1080 even when I'm on single-player mode netting over 500 FPS. Help? I want to have my game feeling smooth with my game being good-looking.
Custom Folder:
[spoiler]
[u][b]CFGs:[/b][/u]
[b]Autoexec (Comanglia's Mid-Quality PC CFG w/ some non-FPS related parts removed):[/b] http://pastebin.com/zfnj81KM
[b]Other Commands:[/b] http://pastebin.com/G2vpcnGA
[b]Net Settings:[/b] http://pastebin.com/THbTMaEB
[b]No Explosion Smoke Script:[/b] http://pastebin.com/h2gp6HsJ
[b]Launch Options:[/b] http://pastebin.com/BXihETJ8
[u][b]Also Includes:[/b][/u]
FlameHUD, Custom Hitsound, No Soundscapes, and some Training Maps.
[/spoiler]
Specs:
[spoiler]
- Intel Pentium G3258 OC'd to 4.3 GHz
- AMD Radeon R9 270
- 128GB SSD
- MSi Z97 PC Mate Mobo
- EVGA 500B PSU
- 1TB HDD (My TF2 is on here)
- ASUS VG236H 2ms Response Time Monitor (OC'd to 74.5 Hz W/ patched HDMI frequency)
- Windows 10
[/spoiler]
Benchmarks:
[spoiler]
[b]-default:[/b]
[quote=benchmark1.dem]2639 frames 31.328 seconds 84.24 fps (11.87 ms/f) 10.972 fps variability[/quote]
[quote=benchmark2.dem]4843 frames 55.539 seconds 87.20 fps (11.47 ms/f) 13.960 fps variability
[/quote]
[b]-autoconfig w/ Multicore Rendering:[/b]
[quote=benchmark1.dem]2639 frames 31.782 seconds 83.04 fps (12.04 ms/f) 9.972 fps variability[/quote]
[quote=benchmark2.dem]4843 frames 53.097 seconds 91.21 fps (10.96 ms/f) 12.610 fps variability[/quote]
[b]-autoconfig w/ Comanglia's Cinema Config:[/b]
[quote=benchmark1.dem]2639 frames 36.848 seconds 71.62 fps (13.96 ms/f) 4.975 fps variability[/quote]
[quote=benchmark2.dem]4843 frames 60.457 seconds 80.11 fps (12.48 ms/f) 10.065 fps variability[/quote]
[b]-autoconfig w/ Comanglia's High Quality PCs Config:[/b]
[quote=benchmark1.dem]2639 frames 20.312 seconds 129.93 fps ( 7.70 ms/f) 10.203 fps variability[/quote]
[quote=benchmark2.dem]4843 frames 39.906 seconds 121.36 fps ( 8.24 ms/f) 17.940 fps variability[/quote]
[b]-autoconfig w/ Comanglia's Mid-Quality PCs Config:[/b]
[quote=benchmark1.dem]2639 frames 19.749 seconds 133.63 fps ( 7.48 ms/f) 9.994 fps variability[/quote]
[quote=benchmark2.dem]4843 frames 38.221 seconds 126.71 fps ( 7.89 ms/f) 18.868 fps variability[/quote]
[b]-autoconfig w/ R4ndom's Config:[/b]
[quote=benchmark1.dem]2639 frames 19.356 seconds 136.34 fps ( 7.33 ms/f) 10.541 fps variability[/quote]
[quote=benchmark2.dem]4843 frames 38.651 seconds 125.30 fps ( 7.98 ms/f) 18.389 fps variability[/quote]
[/spoiler]
Optimizations:
[spoiler]
- http://www.teamfortress.tv/29140/massive-fps-boost-for-amd-catalyst-users
- https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=483257164
- RadeonPro Settings (This is literally all I have enabled): http://i.imgur.com/ytZg92m.png
[/spoiler]
MightyIn-game, 1280 x 720 feels WAY smoother than 1920 x 1080 even when I'm on single-player mode netting over 500 FPS. Help? I want to have my game feeling smooth with my game being good-looking."
You can keep scaling down your res or remove hats/particles but without dropping down to Comanglias Toaster cfg you wont be able to get much more AFAIK.
[quote=Mighty]In-game, 1280 x 720 feels WAY smoother than 1920 x 1080 even when I'm on single-player mode netting over 500 FPS. Help? I want to have my game feeling smooth with my game being good-looking." [/quote]
You can keep scaling down your res or remove hats/particles but without dropping down to Comanglias Toaster cfg you wont be able to get much more AFAIK.
have you tried removing the -refreshe command from the launch options?
have you tried removing the -refreshe command from the launch options?
obviously lowering your res will increase fps lol but you wont be able to get the fps you get on 1280 on 1920 unless you use a super low graphics config
obviously lowering your res will increase fps lol but you wont be able to get the fps you get on 1280 on 1920 unless you use a super low graphics config
ProcreativeYou can keep scaling down your res or remove hats/particles but without dropping down to Comanglias Toaster cfg you wont be able to get much more AFAIK.
Comanglia's Configs don't really work like that. The configs are designed to try to optimize TF2 depending on how powerful your hardware is. The toaster CFG is meant to cater to players that are playing on toasters, aka your craptop. Just like the Toaster CFG, the mid-quality CFG is designed to give max fps to mid-tier pcs, and the high quality config is designed to give max fps to powerful pcs.
Sources:
- http://www.teamfortress.tv/25328/comanglias-config-fps-guide/?page=7#194
- Name of the CFGs: Max FPS for High Quality PCs and Max FPS for Mid Quality PCs (tbh I think its the word 'quality' that confuses people)
I downloaded the no hats mod + no particles mod, and it gave me a good 12 fps boost.
Pepzihave you tried removing the -refresh command from the launch options?
ftfy. I tried it about a dozen times or so, but the -refresh command doesn't seem to change it.
invictaobviously lowering your res will increase fps lol but you wont be able to get the fps you get on 1280 on 1920 unless you use a super low graphics config
I thought it was common knowledge that TF2 is a very CPU-Intensive game. Theoretically, the resolution shouldn't make much of a difference in the performance since the GPU isn't very much stressed at all in this game.
Benchmarks w/ benchmark2.dem
1920 x 1080
4843 frames 35.053 seconds 138.16 fps ( 7.24 ms/f) 21.940 fps variability
1280 x 720
4843 frames 34.956 seconds 138.55 fps ( 7.22 ms/f) 22.180 fps variability
896 x 504 (I did it twice because I legit didn't think I was going to get less fps with a lower res)
4843 frames 35.993 seconds 134.55 fps ( 7.43 ms/f) 20.456 fps variability
4843 frames 35.665 seconds 135.79 fps ( 7.36 ms/f) 22.200 fps variability
Also,
MightyIn-game, 1280 x 720 feels WAY smoother than 1920 x 1080 even when I'm on single-player mode netting over 500 FPS. Help? I want to have my game feeling smooth with my game being good-looking.
[quote=Procreative]You can keep scaling down your res or remove hats/particles but without dropping down to Comanglias Toaster cfg you wont be able to get much more AFAIK.[/quote]
Comanglia's Configs don't really work like that. The configs are designed to try to optimize TF2 depending on how powerful your hardware is. The toaster CFG is meant to cater to players that are playing on toasters, aka your craptop. Just like the Toaster CFG, the mid-quality CFG is designed to give max fps to mid-tier pcs, and the high quality config is designed to give max fps to powerful pcs.
Sources:
- http://www.teamfortress.tv/25328/comanglias-config-fps-guide/?page=7#194
- Name of the CFGs: [b]Max FPS[/b] for High Quality PCs and [b]Max FPS[/b] for Mid Quality PCs (tbh I think its the word 'quality' that confuses people)
I downloaded the no hats mod + no particles mod, and it gave me a good 12 fps boost.
[quote=Pepzi]have you tried removing the [b]-refresh[/b] command from the launch options?[/quote]
ftfy. I tried it about a dozen times or so, but the -refresh command doesn't seem to change it.
[quote=invicta]obviously lowering your res will increase fps lol but you wont be able to get the fps you get on 1280 on 1920 unless you use a super low graphics config[/quote]
I thought it was common knowledge that TF2 is a very CPU-Intensive game. Theoretically, the resolution shouldn't make much of a difference in the performance since the GPU isn't very much stressed at all in this game.
[b]
Benchmarks w/ benchmark2.dem[/b]
1920 x 1080
[code]4843 frames 35.053 seconds 138.16 fps ( 7.24 ms/f) 21.940 fps variability[/code]
1280 x 720
[code]4843 frames 34.956 seconds 138.55 fps ( 7.22 ms/f) 22.180 fps variability[/code]
896 x 504 (I did it twice because I legit didn't think I was going to get less fps with a lower res)
[code]4843 frames 35.993 seconds 134.55 fps ( 7.43 ms/f) 20.456 fps variability[/code]
[code]4843 frames 35.665 seconds 135.79 fps ( 7.36 ms/f) 22.200 fps variability[/code]
Also,
[quote=Mighty]In-game, 1280 x 720 feels WAY smoother than 1920 x 1080 [b]even when I'm on single-player mode netting over 500 FPS.[/b] Help? I want to have my game feeling smooth with my game being good-looking.[/quote]
WHY DONT U JUST PLAY ON 1280X720
WHY DONT U JUST PLAY ON 1280X720
kittynWHY DONT U JUST PLAY ON 1280X720
Stretched rez looks like ass on LCDs.
[quote=kittyn]WHY DONT U JUST PLAY ON 1280X720[/quote]
Stretched rez looks like ass on LCDs.
try mat_queue_mode 0
try disabling all threading commands
try fps_max 300
try removing most of your launch options (including threads, nod3d9e2)
try all of the above at the same time
try mat_queue_mode 0
try disabling all threading commands
try fps_max 300
try removing most of your launch options (including threads, nod3d9e2)
try all of the above at the same time
you are the master of placebo
remember when you were trying to convince everyone that mat_maxframelatency did something, then valve just removed that command
you are the master of placebo
remember when you were trying to convince everyone that mat_maxframelatency did something, then valve just removed that command
This is why i play at 960 x 540, but you'll need to setup a custom resolution for that. I used to play 1280 x 720 until the update killed enough fps for me on that.
ScrewballkittynWHY DONT U JUST PLAY ON 1280X720
Stretched rez looks like ass on LCDs.
1280x720 is not stretched, it is still 16:9. Playing 800x600 full screen on a 16:9 monitor would be stretched.
This is why i play at 960 x 540, but you'll need to setup a custom resolution for that. I used to play 1280 x 720 until the update killed enough fps for me on that.
[quote=Screwball][quote=kittyn]WHY DONT U JUST PLAY ON 1280X720[/quote]
Stretched rez looks like ass on LCDs.[/quote]
1280x720 is not stretched, it is still 16:9. Playing 800x600 full screen on a 16:9 monitor would be stretched.
ScrewballkittynWHY DONT U JUST PLAY ON 1280X720
Stretched rez looks like ass on LCDs.
its not "stretched", its non-native. feels a bit wierd, but not that terrible.
[quote=Screwball][quote=kittyn]WHY DONT U JUST PLAY ON 1280X720[/quote]
Stretched rez looks like ass on LCDs.[/quote]
its not "stretched", its non-native. feels a bit wierd, but not that terrible.