Upvote Upvoted 61 Downvote Downvoted
1 ⋅⋅ 5 6 7 8 9 10
Wow really?
211
#211
-5 Frags +

why isn't there a disqualification rule like if there is proof that someone ddos'd someone else then the ddos'er should get disqualified along with his/her team (unless theres already a rule like that)

why isn't there a disqualification rule like if there is proof that someone ddos'd someone else then the ddos'er should get disqualified along with his/her team (unless theres already a rule like that)
212
#212
3 Frags +
Oblivionagewhy isn't there a disqualification rule like if there is proof that someone ddos'd someone else then the ddos'er should get disqualified along with his/her team (unless theres already a rule like that)

what proof?

[quote=Oblivionage]why isn't there a disqualification rule like if there is proof that someone ddos'd someone else then the ddos'er should get disqualified along with his/her team (unless theres already a rule like that)[/quote]

what proof?
213
#213
-11 Frags +
vileOblivionagewhy isn't there a disqualification rule like if there is proof that someone ddos'd someone else then the ddos'er should get disqualified along with his/her team (unless theres already a rule like that)
what proof?

admittance? if you can get the asshole to admit to it then couldn't u use that? i'm sure he'll admit to it in some way like a retard.

[quote=vile][quote=Oblivionage]why isn't there a disqualification rule like if there is proof that someone ddos'd someone else then the ddos'er should get disqualified along with his/her team (unless theres already a rule like that)[/quote]

what proof?[/quote]

admittance? if you can get the asshole to admit to it then couldn't u use that? i'm sure he'll admit to it in some way like a retard.
214
#214
-3 Frags +
OblivionagevileOblivionagewhy isn't there a disqualification rule like if there is proof that someone ddos'd someone else then the ddos'er should get disqualified along with his/her team (unless theres already a rule like that)
what proof?

admittance? if you can get the asshole to admit to it then couldn't u use that? i'm sure he'll admit to it in some way like a retard.

lol, what? hey esea, we have proof of bape ddosing blackmonster. here it is! *points at bape and waits for him to admit it*

[quote=Oblivionage][quote=vile][quote=Oblivionage]why isn't there a disqualification rule like if there is proof that someone ddos'd someone else then the ddos'er should get disqualified along with his/her team (unless theres already a rule like that)[/quote]

what proof?[/quote]

admittance? if you can get the asshole to admit to it then couldn't u use that? i'm sure he'll admit to it in some way like a retard.[/quote]

lol, what? hey esea, we have proof of bape ddosing blackmonster. here it is! *points at bape and waits for him to admit it*
215
#215
1 Frags +

White Knight

White Knight
216
#216
-21 Frags +

I'm a Dark Knight

*insert batman picture*

I'm a Dark Knight

*insert batman picture*
217
#217
30 Frags +
synchroaimHe threw want more info pm meI'll save you the trouble. According to some people, ndust is moving up to AG or some similar-caliber team, and blacky is joining indust we trust. He (supposedly) threw the match to have a good reason to leave the team.

Well this is news to me, I wasn't aware I was joining their team let alone any team. I rang medic for them one night and they expressed interest in me joining their team but I told them I wasn't sure what I was doing next season as this season isn't even over yet. Why would I throw a game to need a good reason to leave the team when I can just say "hey guys, I'm playing on a new team next season". lol that makes total sense...

anyways, about the whole ddosing thing. I, personally, am not accusing bape or anyone personally of ddosing me during the game. All I know is that I definitely was ddosed and it coincidentally happened to start after I switched to sniper and started to get lots of kills. My internet was perfectly fine throughout all our scrims leading up to the match as well as all the way through the middle of the 2nd round when I switched to sniper. It then came back after we lost 2 rounds due to playing 5v6 where I joined back at halftime with my internet perfectly fine for the next 2 rounds where we won again. Then again magically my internet goes bad at the end of the 6th round just in time to play 5v6 the last round to lose. And to top it all off my internet magically turns back on shortly after the match. Once again, I am not saying bape personally did it, but I definitely was ddosed, and I think the whole situation is pretty sad where people need to ddos playoff matches for fun. I am just upset that my team and I couldn't play a game without getting disrupted and nobody can do anything about it. Not going to point fingers or place blame but it really needs to stop.

[quote=synchro][quote=aim]He threw want more info pm me[/quote]
I'll save you the trouble. According to some people, ndust is moving up to AG or some similar-caliber team, and blacky is joining indust we trust. He (supposedly) threw the match to have a good reason to leave the team.[/quote]

Well this is news to me, I wasn't aware I was joining their team let alone any team. I rang medic for them one night and they expressed interest in me joining their team but I told them I wasn't sure what I was doing next season as this season isn't even over yet. Why would I throw a game to need a good reason to leave the team when I can just say "hey guys, I'm playing on a new team next season". lol that makes total sense...

anyways, about the whole ddosing thing. I, personally, am not accusing bape or anyone personally of ddosing me during the game. All I know is that I definitely was ddosed and it coincidentally happened to start after I switched to sniper and started to get lots of kills. My internet was perfectly fine throughout all our scrims leading up to the match as well as all the way through the middle of the 2nd round when I switched to sniper. It then came back after we lost 2 rounds due to playing 5v6 where I joined back at halftime with my internet perfectly fine for the next 2 rounds where we won again. Then again magically my internet goes bad at the end of the 6th round just in time to play 5v6 the last round to lose. And to top it all off my internet magically turns back on shortly after the match. Once again, I am not saying bape personally did it, but I definitely was ddosed, and I think the whole situation is pretty sad where people need to ddos playoff matches for fun. I am just upset that my team and I couldn't play a game without getting disrupted and nobody can do anything about it. Not going to point fingers or place blame but it really needs to stop.
218
#218
16 Frags +

I wasn't even going to comment on this thread but I just watched Dobb's video and when it go to the first pause and they started talking about "abusing" the unpausing mechanic I lost it.

Holy shit that was the most unsportsmanlike and childish thing I have ever heard. They only deserve to get the win revoked because of how big of dickheads they were being who even cares about the DDoS anymore.

I wasn't even going to comment on this thread but I just watched Dobb's video and when it go to the first pause and they started talking about "abusing" the unpausing mechanic I lost it.

Holy shit that was the most unsportsmanlike and childish thing I have ever heard. They only deserve to get the win revoked because of how big of dickheads they were being who even cares about the DDoS anymore.
219
#219
14 Frags +

yea, they knew I was getting ddosed at that point and they still made sure we weren't allowed to pause again, or for longer than the rules stated in order to play 5v6. pretty awesome.

yea, they knew I was getting ddosed at that point and they still made sure we weren't allowed to pause again, or for longer than the rules stated in order to play 5v6. pretty awesome.
220
#220
6 Frags +
synchro He (supposedly) threw the match to have a good reason to leave the team.

This is by far the most stupidest theory in this whole thread lol.

[quote=synchro] He (supposedly) threw the match to have a good reason to leave the team.
[/quote]

This is by far the most stupidest theory in this whole thread lol.
221
#221
RGB LAN
19 Frags +

I'm going to be very disappointed if ESEA does nothing about this. I understand that there might be a lack of evidence for the fact that blacky didn't do that netstat thing, but I really don't want this to turn into DDoS Fortress 2.

I'm going to be very disappointed if ESEA does nothing about this. I understand that there might be a lack of evidence for the fact that blacky didn't do that netstat thing, but I really don't want this to turn into DDoS Fortress 2.
222
#222
-2 Frags +

If it cant be directly proven that it was someone on the other team, ESEA should at least a rule were if someone can show an admin a photo of their cmd after netstat, they can reschedule their match.

The only realy problem with this is that if a team is losing, they could have someone ddos themselves...

If it cant be directly proven that it was someone on the other team, ESEA should at least a rule were if someone can show an admin a photo of their cmd after netstat, they can reschedule their match.

The only realy problem with this is that if a team is losing, they could have someone ddos themselves...
223
#223
8 Frags +
AvastI wasn't even going to comment on this thread but I just watched Dobb's video and when it go to the first pause and they started talking about "abusing" the unpausing mechanic I lost it.

Does anyone else find it odd that within a minute or two of the pause they were discussing the rule of the 5 minute pause? Like, I've played in matches where someone paused and the concept of "how long are they allowed to pause?" didn't come up until LONG after it was clear that the other team had exhausted their resources and we really were just wasting time sitting here staring at the PAUSE on our screen for 20 minutes. Maybe I'm just not an ass-hat, but the first thing that goes through my mind when the other team pauses isn't "how long until we can force them to unpause?" Someone on Dobbb's stream said "I don't want to sit here waiting for an hour for them to unpause". That's a pretty bold statement to make when the pause has only lasted 2 minutes and you don't even know what caused the pause.

Their conversation and train of thought during that pause seemed very abnormal compared to the general conversations I've had on teams where a paused occurred. But that's just compared to my experiences.

[quote=Avast]I wasn't even going to comment on this thread but I just watched Dobb's video and when it go to the first pause and they started talking about "abusing" the unpausing mechanic I lost it.
[/quote]
Does anyone else find it odd that within a minute or two of the pause they were discussing the rule of the 5 minute pause? Like, I've played in matches where someone paused and the concept of "how long are they allowed to pause?" didn't come up until LONG after it was clear that the other team had exhausted their resources and we really were just wasting time sitting here staring at the PAUSE on our screen for 20 minutes. Maybe I'm just not an ass-hat, but the first thing that goes through my mind when the other team pauses isn't "how long until we can force them to unpause?" Someone on Dobbb's stream said "I don't want to sit here waiting for an hour for them to unpause". That's a pretty bold statement to make when the pause has only lasted 2 minutes [b]and[/b] you don't even know what caused the pause.

Their conversation and train of thought during that pause seemed [i]very[/i] abnormal compared to the general conversations I've had on teams where a paused occurred. But that's just compared to my experiences.
224
#224
5 Frags +

well yeah but what we had here was a tied game scenario (3-3) that was decided by DDoS
regardless of the pause rule the match result is dumb
also as shown by the screenshot of in game chat Toon Gang acknowledged that it could have been DDoS and clearly it was a case of no fucks given

[edit] here's the screenshot

EsDeeKayhttp://i.imgur.com/VIlbu5S.png.

if nothing else it's awful sportsmanship

well yeah but what we had here was a tied game scenario (3-3) that was decided by DDoS
regardless of the pause rule the match result is dumb
also as shown by the screenshot of in game chat Toon Gang acknowledged that it could have been DDoS and clearly it was a case of no fucks given

[edit] here's the screenshot
[quote=EsDeeKay][img]http://i.imgur.com/VIlbu5S.png[/img].[/quote]
if nothing else it's awful sportsmanship
225
#225
-28 Frags +

How do you get an acknowledgement from that, can you tell the difference between a snide remark and a acknowledgement. Everything you have posted on this thread has been moronic.

How do you get an acknowledgement from that, can you tell the difference between a snide remark and a acknowledgement. Everything you have posted on this thread has been moronic.
226
#226
4 Frags +
TWSSLERHow do you get an acknowledgement from that, can you tell the difference between a snide remark and a acknowledgement. Everything you have posted on this thread has been moronic.

pot calling kettle black

[quote=TWSSLER]How do you get an acknowledgement from that, can you tell the difference between a snide remark and a acknowledgement. Everything you have posted on this thread has been moronic.[/quote]

pot calling kettle black
227
#227
4 Frags +

There might not be any physical evidence but I would still like to hear the thoughts of someone from ESEA.

There might not be any physical evidence but I would still like to hear the thoughts of someone from ESEA.
228
#228
0 Frags +
TheFragileI'm going to be very disappointed if ESEA does nothing about this. I understand that there might be a lack of evidence for the fact that blacky didn't do that netstat thing, but I really don't want this to turn into DDoS Fortress 2.

depends if kalkin or killing say anything about this

[quote=TheFragile]I'm going to be very disappointed if ESEA does nothing about this. I understand that there might be a lack of evidence for the fact that blacky didn't do that netstat thing, but I really don't want this to turn into DDoS Fortress 2.[/quote]

depends if kalkin or killing say anything about this
229
#229
22 Frags +

http://i.imgur.com/Mboj1PM.gif

[img]http://i.imgur.com/Mboj1PM.gif[/img]
230
#230
8 Frags +

.

.
231
#231
14 Frags +
neroFrom what I heard esea has spoken privately to someone from the teams and said that they can't overturn the game because supposedly it's the players responsibility to take care of his own IP.

Begun, the ddos wars has...

[quote=nero]From what I heard esea has spoken privately to someone from the teams and said that they can't overturn the game because supposedly it's the players responsibility to take care of his own IP.[/quote]

Begun, the ddos wars has...
232
#232
11 Frags +
neroFrom what I heard esea has spoken privately to someone from the teams and said that they can't overturn the game because supposedly it's the players responsibility to take care of his own IP.

If this is true, then ESEA pretty much just gave everyone the green-light to DOS EVERYONE during their games...

ESEA TF2 = ESEA DOS WARS!!! THINK YOU CAN DOS THE BEST? TEST YOUR MIGHT! *Insert Mortal Kombat Theme Song*

What the actual fuck?

[quote=nero]From what I heard esea has spoken privately to someone from the teams and said that they can't overturn the game because supposedly it's the players responsibility to take care of his own IP.[/quote]

If this is true, then ESEA pretty much just gave everyone the green-light to DOS EVERYONE during their games...

ESEA TF2 = ESEA DOS WARS!!! THINK YOU CAN DOS THE BEST? TEST YOUR MIGHT! *Insert Mortal Kombat Theme Song*

What the actual fuck?
233
#233
10 Frags +

Wonder what their reaction would be if they started DDOSing CSGO Invite. I think that's like one of the only games they care about now :C.

Wonder what their reaction would be if they started DDOSing CSGO Invite. I think that's like one of the only games they care about now :C.
234
#234
9 Frags +

Will trade unusual for DDoS tools

Will trade unusual for DDoS tools
235
#235
7 Frags +

http://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/images/5/58/Scout_sf12_badmagic04.wav

http://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/images/5/58/Scout_sf12_badmagic04.wav
236
#236
6 Frags +
neroFrom what I heard esea has spoken privately to someone from the teams and said that they can't overturn the game because supposedly it's the players responsibility to take care of his own IP.

remember children protect your ip
never use the internet
ever

[quote=nero]From what I heard esea has spoken privately to someone from the teams and said that they can't overturn the game because supposedly it's the players responsibility to take care of his own IP.[/quote]
remember children protect your ip
never use the internet
ever
237
#237
6 Frags +

honestly surprised that esea doesn't have a rule regarding this since this happened quite a bit in the past in cs (and afaik still happens). lol players are doing it as well (and have been banned by riot in the past).

honestly surprised that esea doesn't have a rule regarding this since this happened quite a bit in the past in cs (and afaik still happens). lol players are doing it as well (and have been banned by riot in the past).
238
#238
3 Frags +

its because with so many outside factors that can affect ones internet, its pretty hard to prove

(a) its a dos/ddos
(b) its from this exact esea user with this specific ip

its pretty easy to spoof any kind of ip queries as long as the person isnt on site

now when you decide to (d)dos esea itself/its server clusters or its casters, thats a felony against a registered business which has logs of all its traffic, so thats a bit of a different story

its because with so many outside factors that can affect ones internet, its pretty hard to prove

(a) its a dos/ddos
(b) its from this exact esea user with this specific ip

its pretty easy to spoof any kind of ip queries as long as the person isnt on site

now when you decide to (d)dos esea itself/its server clusters or its casters, thats a felony against a registered business which has logs of all its traffic, so thats a bit of a different story
239
#239
5 Frags +

9:18 PM - synchro: MyPocketBlows_JM: dude bunny says he's gonna ddos slip team so he makes it look like bape is ddos'ing to win for the team...
MyPocketBlows_JM: word on the street =X
MyPocketBlows_JM: blacky is on it also
MyPocketBlows_JM: they mad cos they lost
MyPocketBlows_JM: ?
MyPocketBlows_JM: no blacky told bunny to do it
9:19 PM - synchro: if someone on your team gets ddos'd we're just gonna let you guys win so
9:19 PM - synchro: hopefully that doesn't happen
9:19 PM - slipz d:): ok

9:18 PM - synchro: MyPocketBlows_JM: dude bunny says he's gonna ddos slip team so he makes it look like bape is ddos'ing to win for the team...
MyPocketBlows_JM: word on the street =X
MyPocketBlows_JM: blacky is on it also
MyPocketBlows_JM: they mad cos they lost
MyPocketBlows_JM: ?
MyPocketBlows_JM: no blacky told bunny to do it
9:19 PM - synchro: if someone on your team gets ddos'd we're just gonna let you guys win so
9:19 PM - synchro: hopefully that doesn't happen
9:19 PM - slipz d:): ok
240
#240
0 Frags +

finally. its over.

finally. its over.
1 ⋅⋅ 5 6 7 8 9 10
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.