you're pretty explicitly referring to immigration, no matter how hard you try to push it otherwise. that's a race thing. heavy profiling off of someone's race-and-culture-created looks and nothing else is a pretty hardcore race thing, even

"these people"

you can say the word "muslim" out loud, you know. that's what you're explicitly referring to, trying to mildly cover it isn't helping you

as a side-note, I've noticed a lot of ppl from non-western countries refer to IS as "daesh", and I ended up finding this:

https://www.freewordcentre.com/blog/2015/02/daesh-isis-media-alice-guthrie/

in a quick TL;DR: acronyms aren't common in arabic, the terrorist org it refers to specifically wants its fancy long name in arabic as a form of sounding powerful, and thus an acronym like "daesh" ends up both taking the piss and taking a shot at their power over islam at the same time

alright then, let's shoot. from only a few pages back:

how do you think you can interpret a "muslim", solely on looks, without them potentially being of another religion entirely

I could probably create the exact same conclusion on christian morals in the US, should I focus solely on a heavy right-wing state, but that wouldn't be very indicative of american society as a whole, would it

just as a quick tip, also: copy all of the bind commands from config.cfg, in your cfg folder, and make a cfg out of them to exec in every class config. if you ever intend to script more heavily (not for rocket-jumping tho, that won't end well) this'll be much easier long-term than trying to remember what key you put on what class, because it'll just always go back to your default keys if you don't have any set up on that class

why did you ignore the several countries which heavily rejected it shown from the exact same paragraph?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/mosque-peterborough-fire-1.3320013

...jesus fucking christ, this was right near where I used to live

just as a reminder: this is precisely what IS wants out of reactions. they want to easily justify what they're doing, and this plays flawlessly into that. don't let them have this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYrnAaNW5ow

directly lifted from the source:

https://i.imgur.com/UPs1L49.png

I suppose the point can still technically stand on its own disconnected from the UK, but the vagueness on the UK's part is a bit of a nuisance

e: actually looking into this, a lot of data is weird. for example, despite europol still being able to know which crimes are and aren't right-wing extremism upon arrest, no country is actually willing to properly classify the attacks as such, even though they still do so for left-wing extremism, which gives a similar amount of arrests. these statistics are odd

...I thought I put "in canada" at the end of that, but forgot. yeah, I meant in context of canada's domestic terrorism. my bad

maybe if we dump oil onto the forest fire, it'll douse itself out

yeah, I'm down for that. my apologies for the argument

I should point out that, in this scenario, there has been no form of "islamic terrorism" in canada, under the legal definition, that involved as many deaths as the ecole polytechnique massacre in quebec.

again, the definition of terrorism is intentionally arbitrary, but for logical comparison they can absolutely be classified as ideological when they explicitly have a learned, harmful ideology, shared through others wanting to hold power, behind their killings

this is flat-out incorrect, as statistics people have been regularly posting have shown. likewise, mental health as an excuse is mostly used in america as another scapegoat, as any genuine problem in mental health is immediately brushed aside once people cease talking about the shooter

on top of this, a good number of the shooters are well-known to hold ideology, as I was specifically referring to the militant atheist who shot and killed his muslim neighbors, or the men's rights activist who made a youtube video of his motto a day before killing . it's simply not referred to under the american semantics of "terrorism", because the american definition is intentionally set to only refer to anti-state killers

the sheer fact that a not-small number of american shootings in recent years has come from rather militant atheists kinda points out how little religion really has to do with it in the long run. it's just a middle man for their moral justifications at most, and the actual consistency comes in their need to enforce a power structure in their favor long-term

canada is one of the most heavily multi-cultured first-world countries out there, a pretty wide mixture of atheists, muslims and catholic christians from city-to-city... and the only times heavy islamist terrorism came about was in very edge-case scenarios that were either prevented, or quickly contained. on the flip-side, the 60s had a bunch of quebecois nationalist terrorists, who weren't very religious at all