dollarlayer makes some good points have u considered READING HIS POSTS
Donald Trump
posted in
World Events
local tf2 forum goer $layer knows more about climate change than climate scientists, scientists respond "how could we be so naive"
local tf2 forum goer $layer knows more about climate change than climate scientists, scientists respond "how could we be so naive"
dollarlayerTino_the want to ban an entire religion from the country, the want to build a fuckign wall, yet what Clinton does in the international scene somehow matters to them? The fuck is that mental disconnect holy shit.
Really, Trump supporters want to ban en entire religion from the country. That is news to me. Is that something you picked up on through a left wing news station? To be clear, Trump initially (after several terrorist attacks) proposed a temporary ban on Muslim Immigration into the US, until the government could figure out how to vet people and differentiate the extremists from the moderates. Later on he scaled down his approach, but still wants extreme vetting for people trying to enter the country from nations with ties to Terrorism. Seems pretty reasonable to me.
Tino_Yes Clinton may be a poor choice as someone to lead the US when you look at all the past leaders of the country. But Trump is 100% by far The. Worst. Candidate. To. Ever. Run. And the fact that people cant see that just shows how fucked the US is as a country.
I'd really like to hear your reasons as to why Trump is so bad. Here I'll list some for why Hillary is by far the worst and most corrupt candidate to ever run:
1) Pay to play corruption
2) Bribes from foreign governments
3) Lying under oath to Congress (a felony)
4) Lying to the FBI
5) Gross negligence of classified material (a felony)
6) 100's of mysterious deaths that surround the Clintons. Far to many to be brushed off as a conspiracy theory.
7) Covering up and threatening Bill Clinton's rape victims.
8) Selling arms to terrorists
9) Lying under oath to congress and to the famalies about Lybia, when her direct actions caused the deaths of multiple people.
10) Later laughing about the deaths of these people.
11) Defending someone in court that she knew was a rapist that brutally raped a 13 year old girl to the point that doctors said she will likely never reproduce. Getting this rapist off without punishment and laughing and joking and bragging about it years later.
12) Collusion with the DOJ
13) Collusion with the media
14) Illegal election activities and rigging against Bernie and Trump, many of them disclosed in the wikileaks podesta emails and in the project veritas videos.
I'm not sure if you are naive, stupid, or only listen to the mainstream media, but please open up your mind and do research before you make such an outrageous statement that Trump is worse than Hillary.
I challenge you to come up with reasons as to why Trump is better, not policies or shit like gun control. What has Trump done to prove he is not fuckign retarded and he can actually run a country? Going bankrupt multiple times, all of the racist, sexist and bigoted shit he has said and the sexual assault that was "just talk" really doesn't show much. I said Clinton is bad, she has done shady shit, that is not news. What has Trump done? Because Clinton has a list of shit that she has done as a public defender and as someone on the world stage 10000x longer then those 15 points. 10 of which hold almost no value because many many people have done the same.
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=Tino_]the want to ban an entire religion from the country, the want to build a fuckign wall, yet what Clinton does in the international scene somehow matters to them? The fuck is that mental disconnect holy shit.[/quote]
Really, Trump supporters want to ban en entire religion from the country. That is news to me. Is that something you picked up on through a left wing news station? To be clear, Trump initially (after several terrorist attacks) proposed a temporary ban on Muslim Immigration into the US, until the government could figure out how to vet people and differentiate the extremists from the moderates. Later on he scaled down his approach, but still wants extreme vetting for people trying to enter the country from nations with ties to Terrorism. Seems pretty reasonable to me.
[quote=Tino_]Yes Clinton may be a poor choice as someone to lead the US when you look at all the past leaders of the country. But Trump is 100% by far The. Worst. Candidate. To. Ever. Run. And the fact that people cant see that just shows how fucked the US is as a country.[/quote]
I'd really like to hear your reasons as to why Trump is so bad. Here I'll list some for why Hillary is by far the worst and most corrupt candidate to ever run:
1) Pay to play corruption
2) Bribes from foreign governments
3) Lying under oath to Congress (a felony)
4) Lying to the FBI
5) Gross negligence of classified material (a felony)
6) 100's of mysterious deaths that surround the Clintons. Far to many to be brushed off as a conspiracy theory.
7) Covering up and threatening Bill Clinton's rape victims.
8) Selling arms to terrorists
9) Lying under oath to congress and to the famalies about Lybia, when her direct actions caused the deaths of multiple people.
10) Later laughing about the deaths of these people.
11) Defending someone in court that she knew was a rapist that brutally raped a 13 year old girl to the point that doctors said she will likely never reproduce. Getting this rapist off without punishment and laughing and joking and bragging about it years later.
12) Collusion with the DOJ
13) Collusion with the media
14) Illegal election activities and rigging against Bernie and Trump, many of them disclosed in the wikileaks podesta emails and in the project veritas videos.
I'm not sure if you are naive, stupid, or only listen to the mainstream media, but please open up your mind and do research before you make such an outrageous statement that Trump is worse than Hillary.
[/quote]
I challenge you to come up with reasons as to why Trump is better, not policies or shit like gun control. What has Trump done to prove he is not fuckign retarded and he can actually run a country? Going bankrupt multiple times, all of the racist, sexist and bigoted shit he has said and the sexual assault that was "just talk" really doesn't show much. I said Clinton is bad, she has done shady shit, that is not news. What has Trump done? Because Clinton has a list of shit that she has done as a public defender and as someone on the world stage 10000x longer then those 15 points. 10 of which hold almost no value because many many people have done the same.
Really, Trump supporters want to ban en entire religion from the country. That is news to me. Is that something you picked up on through a left wing news station? To be clear, Trump initially (after several terrorist attacks) proposed a temporary ban on Muslim Immigration into the US, until the government could figure out how to vet people and differentiate the extremists from the moderates. Later on he scaled down his approach, but still wants extreme vetting for people trying to enter the country from nations with ties to Terrorism. Seems pretty reasonable to me.
[quote=Tino_]Yes Clinton may be a poor choice as someone to lead the US when you look at all the past leaders of the country. But Trump is 100% by far The. Worst. Candidate. To. Ever. Run. And the fact that people cant see that just shows how fucked the US is as a country.[/quote]
I'd really like to hear your reasons as to why Trump is so bad. Here I'll list some for why Hillary is by far the worst and most corrupt candidate to ever run:
1) Pay to play corruption
2) Bribes from foreign governments
3) Lying under oath to Congress (a felony)
4) Lying to the FBI
5) Gross negligence of classified material (a felony)
6) 100's of mysterious deaths that surround the Clintons. Far to many to be brushed off as a conspiracy theory.
7) Covering up and threatening Bill Clinton's rape victims.
8) Selling arms to terrorists
9) Lying under oath to congress and to the famalies about Lybia, when her direct actions caused the deaths of multiple people.
10) Later laughing about the deaths of these people.
11) Defending someone in court that she knew was a rapist that brutally raped a 13 year old girl to the point that doctors said she will likely never reproduce. Getting this rapist off without punishment and laughing and joking and bragging about it years later.
12) Collusion with the DOJ
13) Collusion with the media
14) Illegal election activities and rigging against Bernie and Trump, many of them disclosed in the wikileaks podesta emails and in the project veritas videos.
I'm not sure if you are naive, stupid, or only listen to the mainstream media, but please open up your mind and do research before you make such an outrageous statement that Trump is worse than Hillary.
[/quote]
I challenge you to come up with reasons as to why Trump is better, not policies or shit like gun control. What has Trump done to prove he is not fuckign retarded and he can actually run a country? Going bankrupt multiple times, all of the racist, sexist and bigoted shit he has said and the sexual assault that was "just talk" really doesn't show much. I said Clinton is bad, she has done shady shit, that is not news. What has Trump done? Because Clinton has a list of shit that she has done as a public defender and as someone on the world stage 10000x longer then those 15 points. 10 of which hold almost no value because many many people have done the same.
fahrenheitlocal tf2 forum goer $layer knows more about climate change than climate scientists, scientists respond "how could we be so naive"
[quote=fahrenheit]local tf2 forum goer $layer knows more about climate change than climate scientists, scientists respond "how could we be so naive"[/quote]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
"and yes that is in fact true that the earth goes through cycles but the actual issue right now is that we are artificially increasing the warming rate by destroying the Ozone layer"
i dont think i should respond anymore its like talking to someone who doesnt think dinosaurs existed
"and yes that is in fact true that the earth goes through cycles but the actual issue right now is that we are artificially increasing the warming rate by destroying the Ozone layer"
i dont think i should respond anymore its like talking to someone who doesnt think dinosaurs existed
i dont think i should respond anymore its like talking to someone who doesnt think dinosaurs existed
dollarlayerBBiA_duchessThat feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.
Did he actually just say grapes. There are more organisms in the world that grapes and grave diggers in greenland lmfao how dumb can someone possibly be.
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=BBiA_duchess]That feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment[/quote]
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.[/quote]
Did he actually just say grapes. There are more organisms in the world that grapes and grave diggers in greenland lmfao how dumb can someone possibly be.
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.[/quote]
Did he actually just say grapes. There are more organisms in the world that grapes and grave diggers in greenland lmfao how dumb can someone possibly be.
dollarlayerfahrenheitlocal tf2 forum goer $layer knows more about climate change than climate scientists, scientists respond "how could we be so naive"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
After just looking up Plimer's name and seeing numerous websites picking apart his arguments and books, then him ignoring critiques; I'm inclined to hold his claims with a grain of salt.
edit: A bit more research he made $400,000 AUD from being a former director of several mining companies and owns mining shares, he believed emissions trading would destroy the mining industry in Australia. I wonder if there's some special interest there.
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=fahrenheit]local tf2 forum goer $layer knows more about climate change than climate scientists, scientists respond "how could we be so naive"[/quote]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8[/quote]
After just looking up Plimer's name and seeing numerous websites picking apart his arguments and books, then him ignoring critiques; I'm inclined to hold his claims with a grain of salt.
edit: A bit more research he made $400,000 AUD from being a former director of several mining companies and owns mining shares, he believed emissions trading would destroy the mining industry in Australia. I wonder if there's some special interest there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8[/quote]
After just looking up Plimer's name and seeing numerous websites picking apart his arguments and books, then him ignoring critiques; I'm inclined to hold his claims with a grain of salt.
edit: A bit more research he made $400,000 AUD from being a former director of several mining companies and owns mining shares, he believed emissions trading would destroy the mining industry in Australia. I wonder if there's some special interest there.
rowpiecesdamn u guys got a lot of free time
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.
remedy"and yes that is in fact true that the earth goes through cycles but the actual issue right now is that we are artificially increasing the warming rate by destroying the Ozone layer"
i dont think i should respond anymore its like talking to someone who doesnt think dinosaurs existed
Watch the video from the geologist speaking to parliament please.
BBiA_duchessdollarlayerBBiA_duchessThat feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.
Did he actually just say grapes. There are more organisms in the world that grapes and grave diggers in greenland lmfao how dumb can someone possibly be.
????? If there is no temperature data from hundreds of years ago, then we have to use other data points such as crops like grapes and olives and where they were grown. If today in some of those areas its too cold to grow these crops, we can logically assume it was warmer back then.
[quote=rowpieces]damn u guys got a lot of free time[/quote]
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.
[quote=remedy]"and yes that is in fact true that the earth goes through cycles but the actual issue right now is that we are artificially increasing the warming rate by destroying the Ozone layer"
i dont think i should respond anymore its like talking to someone who doesnt think dinosaurs existed[/quote]
Watch the video from the geologist speaking to parliament please.
[quote=BBiA_duchess][quote=dollarlayer][quote=BBiA_duchess]That feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment[/quote]
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.[/quote]
Did he actually just say grapes. There are more organisms in the world that grapes and grave diggers in greenland lmfao how dumb can someone possibly be.[/quote]
????? If there is no temperature data from hundreds of years ago, then we have to use other data points such as crops like grapes and olives and where they were grown. If today in some of those areas its too cold to grow these crops, we can logically assume it was warmer back then.
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.
[quote=remedy]"and yes that is in fact true that the earth goes through cycles but the actual issue right now is that we are artificially increasing the warming rate by destroying the Ozone layer"
i dont think i should respond anymore its like talking to someone who doesnt think dinosaurs existed[/quote]
Watch the video from the geologist speaking to parliament please.
[quote=BBiA_duchess][quote=dollarlayer][quote=BBiA_duchess]That feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment[/quote]
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.[/quote]
Did he actually just say grapes. There are more organisms in the world that grapes and grave diggers in greenland lmfao how dumb can someone possibly be.[/quote]
????? If there is no temperature data from hundreds of years ago, then we have to use other data points such as crops like grapes and olives and where they were grown. If today in some of those areas its too cold to grow these crops, we can logically assume it was warmer back then.
dollarlayerrowpiecesdamn u guys got a lot of free time
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.
remedy"and yes that is in fact true that the earth goes through cycles but the actual issue right now is that we are artificially increasing the warming rate by destroying the Ozone layer"
i dont think i should respond anymore its like talking to someone who doesnt think dinosaurs existed
Watch the video from the geologist speaking to parliament please.
BBiA_duchessdollarlayerBBiA_duchessThat feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.
Did he actually just say grapes. There are more organisms in the world that grapes and grave diggers in greenland lmfao how dumb can someone possibly be.
????? If there is no temperature data from hundreds of years ago, then we have to use other data points such as crops like grapes and olives and where they were grown. If today in some of those areas its too cold to grow these crops, we can logically assume it was warmer back then.
Yeah maybe it has gotten colder in small, select areas. But in the rest of the world, it's getting warmer. And just because some organisms like warmer weather doesn't mean it's good for the rest of the world. Ever heard of algae?
Algae thrive in areas of high nitrogen, which comes from fertilizer. By your logic, dumping fertilizer in the water is a good idea because some life forms are happy, even though the rest of the plant life is suffocated.
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=rowpieces]damn u guys got a lot of free time[/quote]
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.
[quote=remedy]"and yes that is in fact true that the earth goes through cycles but the actual issue right now is that we are artificially increasing the warming rate by destroying the Ozone layer"
i dont think i should respond anymore its like talking to someone who doesnt think dinosaurs existed[/quote]
Watch the video from the geologist speaking to parliament please.
[quote=BBiA_duchess][quote=dollarlayer][quote=BBiA_duchess]That feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment[/quote]
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.[/quote]
Did he actually just say grapes. There are more organisms in the world that grapes and grave diggers in greenland lmfao how dumb can someone possibly be.[/quote]
????? If there is no temperature data from hundreds of years ago, then we have to use other data points such as crops like grapes and olives and where they were grown. If today in some of those areas its too cold to grow these crops, we can logically assume it was warmer back then.[/quote]
Yeah maybe it has gotten colder in small, select areas. But in the rest of the world, it's getting warmer. And just because some organisms like warmer weather doesn't mean it's good for the rest of the world. Ever heard of algae?
Algae thrive in areas of high nitrogen, which comes from fertilizer. By your logic, dumping fertilizer in the water is a good idea because some life forms are happy, even though the rest of the plant life is suffocated.
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.
[quote=remedy]"and yes that is in fact true that the earth goes through cycles but the actual issue right now is that we are artificially increasing the warming rate by destroying the Ozone layer"
i dont think i should respond anymore its like talking to someone who doesnt think dinosaurs existed[/quote]
Watch the video from the geologist speaking to parliament please.
[quote=BBiA_duchess][quote=dollarlayer][quote=BBiA_duchess]That feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment[/quote]
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.[/quote]
Did he actually just say grapes. There are more organisms in the world that grapes and grave diggers in greenland lmfao how dumb can someone possibly be.[/quote]
????? If there is no temperature data from hundreds of years ago, then we have to use other data points such as crops like grapes and olives and where they were grown. If today in some of those areas its too cold to grow these crops, we can logically assume it was warmer back then.[/quote]
Yeah maybe it has gotten colder in small, select areas. But in the rest of the world, it's getting warmer. And just because some organisms like warmer weather doesn't mean it's good for the rest of the world. Ever heard of algae?
Algae thrive in areas of high nitrogen, which comes from fertilizer. By your logic, dumping fertilizer in the water is a good idea because some life forms are happy, even though the rest of the plant life is suffocated.
Tino_I challenge you to come up with reasons as to why Trump is better, not policies or shit like gun control. What has Trump done to prove he is not fuckign retarded and he can actually run a country? Going bankrupt multiple times, all of the racist, sexist and bigoted shit he has said and the sexual assault that was "just talk" really doesn't show much. I said Clinton is bad, she has done shady shit, that is not news. What has Trump done? Because Clinton has a list of shit that she has done as a public defender and as someone on the world stage 10000x longer then those 15 points. 10 of which hold almost no value because many many people have done the same.
What is your primary news source, because they are brainwashing you.
Going bakrupt multiple times is actually something Trump brags about. It's not a dumb thing that he did, he took advantage of US bankruptcy laws in order to forgive debt of some of his companies in the past. He didn't personally go bankrupt. The US is heavily in debt, someone with knowledge of how to solve problems like that might be a good thing.
Racist things, again all taken out of context, please give me some examples, I've heard them all. Building a wall racist? Temporary ban on Muslims racist? Extreme vetting of Syrian refugees is that racist?
Sexist. How can you call a man that literally OVER HALF of the executives in his company are women. But I bet you didn't know that, because your "research" involves listening to the mainstream news.
Sexual Assault. Again more left wing media lies. That whole locker room talk thing, I don't know if you actually listened to the actual audio yourself but "They let you do it" does not imply that he forced them to do some sexual act against their will. If I hold out my hand to a famous person and they shake my hand and I later say "so and so let me shake their hand" does that imply I forced them and that it was against their will? The other women coming forward are liars and they've been debunked. Bill is the real rapist here. $800,000 settlement in one rape, expelled from oxford university for raping a girl etc.
I don't need to give you a list. But what I will say is Trump actually cares about the country, he's tired of seeing us get ripped off, tired of poor deals, tired of our police officers being disrespected, tired of our border patrol officers feeling like they can't do their job. He's tired of government corruption in politics "drain the swamp." Basically he wants to put America first and clean up the country.
[quote=Tino_]I challenge you to come up with reasons as to why Trump is better, not policies or shit like gun control. What has Trump done to prove he is not fuckign retarded and he can actually run a country? Going bankrupt multiple times, all of the racist, sexist and bigoted shit he has said and the sexual assault that was "just talk" really doesn't show much. I said Clinton is bad, she has done shady shit, that is not news. What has Trump done? Because Clinton has a list of shit that she has done as a public defender and as someone on the world stage 10000x longer then those 15 points. 10 of which hold almost no value because many many people have done the same.[/quote]
What is your primary news source, because they are brainwashing you.
Going bakrupt multiple times is actually something Trump brags about. It's not a dumb thing that he did, he took advantage of US bankruptcy laws in order to forgive debt of some of his companies in the past. He didn't personally go bankrupt. The US is heavily in debt, someone with knowledge of how to solve problems like that might be a good thing.
Racist things, again all taken out of context, please give me some examples, I've heard them all. Building a wall racist? Temporary ban on Muslims racist? Extreme vetting of Syrian refugees is that racist?
Sexist. How can you call a man that literally OVER HALF of the executives in his company are women. But I bet you didn't know that, because your "research" involves listening to the mainstream news.
Sexual Assault. Again more left wing media lies. That whole locker room talk thing, I don't know if you actually listened to the actual audio yourself but "They let you do it" does not imply that he forced them to do some sexual act against their will. If I hold out my hand to a famous person and they shake my hand and I later say "so and so let me shake their hand" does that imply I forced them and that it was against their will? The other women coming forward are liars and they've been debunked. Bill is the real rapist here. $800,000 settlement in one rape, expelled from oxford university for raping a girl etc.
I don't need to give you a list. But what I will say is Trump actually cares about the country, he's tired of seeing us get ripped off, tired of poor deals, tired of our police officers being disrespected, tired of our border patrol officers feeling like they can't do their job. He's tired of government corruption in politics "drain the swamp." Basically he wants to put America first and clean up the country.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCabT_O0YSM
What is your primary news source, because they are brainwashing you.
Going bakrupt multiple times is actually something Trump brags about. It's not a dumb thing that he did, he took advantage of US bankruptcy laws in order to forgive debt of some of his companies in the past. He didn't personally go bankrupt. The US is heavily in debt, someone with knowledge of how to solve problems like that might be a good thing.
Racist things, again all taken out of context, please give me some examples, I've heard them all. Building a wall racist? Temporary ban on Muslims racist? Extreme vetting of Syrian refugees is that racist?
Sexist. How can you call a man that literally OVER HALF of the executives in his company are women. But I bet you didn't know that, because your "research" involves listening to the mainstream news.
Sexual Assault. Again more left wing media lies. That whole locker room talk thing, I don't know if you actually listened to the actual audio yourself but "They let you do it" does not imply that he forced them to do some sexual act against their will. If I hold out my hand to a famous person and they shake my hand and I later say "so and so let me shake their hand" does that imply I forced them and that it was against their will? The other women coming forward are liars and they've been debunked. Bill is the real rapist here. $800,000 settlement in one rape, expelled from oxford university for raping a girl etc.
I don't need to give you a list. But what I will say is Trump actually cares about the country, he's tired of seeing us get ripped off, tired of poor deals, tired of our police officers being disrespected, tired of our border patrol officers feeling like they can't do their job. He's tired of government corruption in politics "drain the swamp." Basically he wants to put America first and clean up the country.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCabT_O0YSM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/29/trump-booted-a-black-man-from-his-rally-and-called-him-a-thug-turns-out-he-is-a-supporter/
TBH I have better thing to do then argue with people on the internet because how fucked the states is. ESPECIALLY considering that I am a neutral 3rd party as I don't even live there and could care less about who gets in power. So saying that the media has brainwashed me when I don't even watch it or give a shit because its retarded as fuck is totally false. Try harder please. Clinton is questionable at best and Trump is more worthless then Scientology so have fun. Ill sit here and laugh at the idiots.
TBH I have better thing to do then argue with people on the internet because how fucked the states is. ESPECIALLY considering that I am a neutral 3rd party as I don't even live there and could care less about who gets in power. So saying that the media has brainwashed me when I don't even watch it or give a shit because its retarded as fuck is totally false. Try harder please. Clinton is questionable at best and Trump is more worthless then Scientology so have fun. Ill sit here and laugh at the idiots.
remedyhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/29/trump-booted-a-black-man-from-his-rally-and-called-him-a-thug-turns-out-he-is-a-supporter/
Oh my gosh rofl. So his crowd started pointing this guy out, because the guy is pushing his way to the front near Trump to give him a note. They believe he is behaving like a protester and alert Trump that he is a protester and he kicks him out. "He later said it was “all fine” and that he still plans on voting for Trump." It was a mistake largely by his supporters that seemed to indicate he was a protester.
I'm not sure how much of the project veritas video's you've seen but its confirmed that they have multiple people assigned to every single Trump rally to protest and try to stir up violence. This has happened so much, that of course people are going to be occasionally flagged as protesters by the crowd and or Trump.
Tino_TBH I have better thing to do then argue with people on the internet because how fucked the states is. ESPECIALLY considering that I am a neutral 3rd party as I don't even live there and could care less about who gets in power. So saying that the media has brainwashed me when I don't even watch it or give a shit because its retarded as fuck is totally false. Try harder please. Clinton is questionable at best and Trump is more worthless then Scientology so have fun. Ill sit here and laugh at the idiots.
LOL thats fine. Tell me more about how you came to the conclusion that he is a racist, sexist, and has sexually assaulted people if it wasn't from mainstream news sources. Or did you one day have a vision of it in your head? You obviously watched some media in order to have the strong opinions that you shared above. But its ok, the majority of the media is in collusion with Clinton, so I can see how you may have been misguided.
[quote=remedy]https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/10/29/trump-booted-a-black-man-from-his-rally-and-called-him-a-thug-turns-out-he-is-a-supporter/[/quote]
Oh my gosh rofl. So his crowd started pointing this guy out, because the guy is pushing his way to the front near Trump to give him a note. They believe he is behaving like a protester and alert Trump that he is a protester and he kicks him out. "He later said it was “all fine” and that he still plans on voting for Trump." It was a mistake largely by his supporters that seemed to indicate he was a protester.
I'm not sure how much of the project veritas video's you've seen but its confirmed that they have multiple people assigned to every single Trump rally to protest and try to stir up violence. This has happened so much, that of course people are going to be occasionally flagged as protesters by the crowd and or Trump.
[quote=Tino_]TBH I have better thing to do then argue with people on the internet because how fucked the states is. ESPECIALLY considering that I am a neutral 3rd party as I don't even live there and could care less about who gets in power. So saying that the media has brainwashed me when I don't even watch it or give a shit because its retarded as fuck is totally false. Try harder please. Clinton is questionable at best and Trump is more worthless then Scientology so have fun. Ill sit here and laugh at the idiots.[/quote]
LOL thats fine. Tell me more about how you came to the conclusion that he is a racist, sexist, and has sexually assaulted people if it wasn't from mainstream news sources. Or did you one day have a vision of it in your head? You obviously watched some media in order to have the strong opinions that you shared above. But its ok, the majority of the media is in collusion with Clinton, so I can see how you may have been misguided.
Oh my gosh rofl. So his crowd started pointing this guy out, because the guy is pushing his way to the front near Trump to give him a note. They believe he is behaving like a protester and alert Trump that he is a protester and he kicks him out. "He later said it was “all fine” and that he still plans on voting for Trump." It was a mistake largely by his supporters that seemed to indicate he was a protester.
I'm not sure how much of the project veritas video's you've seen but its confirmed that they have multiple people assigned to every single Trump rally to protest and try to stir up violence. This has happened so much, that of course people are going to be occasionally flagged as protesters by the crowd and or Trump.
[quote=Tino_]TBH I have better thing to do then argue with people on the internet because how fucked the states is. ESPECIALLY considering that I am a neutral 3rd party as I don't even live there and could care less about who gets in power. So saying that the media has brainwashed me when I don't even watch it or give a shit because its retarded as fuck is totally false. Try harder please. Clinton is questionable at best and Trump is more worthless then Scientology so have fun. Ill sit here and laugh at the idiots.[/quote]
LOL thats fine. Tell me more about how you came to the conclusion that he is a racist, sexist, and has sexually assaulted people if it wasn't from mainstream news sources. Or did you one day have a vision of it in your head? You obviously watched some media in order to have the strong opinions that you shared above. But its ok, the majority of the media is in collusion with Clinton, so I can see how you may have been misguided.
dollarlayer But its ok, the majority of the media is in collusion with Clinton, so I can see how you may have been misguided.
Annddd you just went from "retard trump supporter" to "So much fucking koolaid you can fill a Olympic pool" Congratulations interacting with you is now useless.
[quote=dollarlayer] But its ok, the majority of the media is in collusion with Clinton, so I can see how you may have been misguided.[/quote]
Annddd you just went from "retard trump supporter" to "So much fucking koolaid you can fill a Olympic pool" Congratulations interacting with you is now useless.
Annddd you just went from "retard trump supporter" to "So much fucking koolaid you can fill a Olympic pool" Congratulations interacting with you is now useless.
It's pointless to argue with this guy over facts, besides we don't need to worry about the earth getting too warm because ocean acidification will kill the oceans and most of the pacific nations first as coral reefs and the base of marine food chains die.
It's pointless to argue with this guy over facts, besides we don't need to worry about the earth getting too warm because ocean acidification will kill the oceans and most of the pacific nations first as coral reefs and the base of marine food chains die.
dollarlayereeeIm not going to respond to your posts anymore if you think climate change isnt real, because youre honestly too stupid for words to be useful
Sry :(
Climate change is real, the climate changes by itself and has for thousands of years which is what I stated. What the hell do you think ice ages were? Not climate change?
The IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) has stated that since 1861 global temperatures have increased 0.6C on average. OMG! I'd love to see the data on the global temperature during the transition phase between an ice age and not an ice age. I sure as hell believe it would be a lot more than 0.6C per 150 years.
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=eee]Im not going to respond to your posts anymore if you think climate change isnt real, because youre honestly too stupid for words to be useful
Sry :([/quote]
Climate change is real, the climate changes by itself and has for thousands of years which is what I stated. What the hell do you think ice ages were? Not climate change?
The IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) has stated that since 1861 global temperatures have increased 0.6C on average. OMG! I'd love to see the data on the global temperature during the transition phase between an ice age and not an ice age. I sure as hell believe it would be a lot more than 0.6C per 150 years.[/quote]
https://xkcd.com/1732/
Sry :([/quote]
Climate change is real, the climate changes by itself and has for thousands of years which is what I stated. What the hell do you think ice ages were? Not climate change?
The IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) has stated that since 1861 global temperatures have increased 0.6C on average. OMG! I'd love to see the data on the global temperature during the transition phase between an ice age and not an ice age. I sure as hell believe it would be a lot more than 0.6C per 150 years.[/quote]
https://xkcd.com/1732/
AvastIt's pointless to argue with this guy over facts, besides we don't need to worry about the earth getting too warm because ocean acidification will kill the oceans and most of the pacific nations first as coral reefs and the base of marine food chains die.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
Did you watch that?
[quote=Avast]It's pointless to argue with this guy over facts, besides we don't need to worry about the earth getting too warm because ocean acidification will kill the oceans and most of the pacific nations first as coral reefs and the base of marine food chains die.[/quote]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
Did you watch that?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
Did you watch that?
dollarlayerAvastIt's pointless to argue with this guy over facts, besides we don't need to worry about the earth getting too warm because ocean acidification will kill the oceans and most of the pacific nations first as coral reefs and the base of marine food chains die.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
Did you watch that?
you understand the scientific consensus is something like 99% to 1% on this right
you dont think that this geologist might have some self interest in this field? where does a geologist typically work?
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=Avast]It's pointless to argue with this guy over facts, besides we don't need to worry about the earth getting too warm because ocean acidification will kill the oceans and most of the pacific nations first as coral reefs and the base of marine food chains die.[/quote]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
Did you watch that?[/quote]
you understand the scientific consensus is something like 99% to 1% on this right
you dont think that this geologist might have some self interest in this field? where does a geologist typically work?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
Did you watch that?[/quote]
you understand the scientific consensus is something like 99% to 1% on this right
you dont think that this geologist might have some self interest in this field? where does a geologist typically work?
dollarlayerAvastIt's pointless to argue with this guy over facts, besides we don't need to worry about the earth getting too warm because ocean acidification will kill the oceans and most of the pacific nations first as coral reefs and the base of marine food chains die.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
Did you watch that?
Yeah dude you're so right just because some random english guy says something i agree with means that I can ignore the rest of the scientific world's consensus that global warming is a threat!
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=Avast]It's pointless to argue with this guy over facts, besides we don't need to worry about the earth getting too warm because ocean acidification will kill the oceans and most of the pacific nations first as coral reefs and the base of marine food chains die.[/quote]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
Did you watch that?[/quote]
Yeah dude you're so right just because some random english guy says something i agree with means that I can ignore the rest of the scientific world's consensus that global warming is a threat!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEPW_P7GVB8
Did you watch that?[/quote]
Yeah dude you're so right just because some random english guy says something i agree with means that I can ignore the rest of the scientific world's consensus that global warming is a threat!
Let's be real here if Trump were president he'd do fuck all and make Pence do all the foreign and domestic stuff (which means everything). And when Pence is one of the most hated governors in recent history for good reason, and says he wants to be like Cheney, warning signs should be hitting you in the face pretty hard right around now that he is probably a bigger issue than the big orange
Let's be real here if Trump were president he'd do fuck all and make Pence do all the foreign and domestic stuff (which means everything). And when Pence is one of the most hated governors in recent history for good reason, and says he wants to be like Cheney, warning signs should be hitting you in the face pretty hard right around now that he is probably a bigger issue than the big orange
TERRYCREWSLet's be real here if Trump were president he'd do fuck all and make Pence do all the foreign and domestic stuff (which means everything). And when Pence is one of the most hated governors in recent history for good reason, and says he wants to be like Cheney, warning signs should be hitting you in the face pretty hard right around now that he is probably a bigger issue than the big orange
Why would Trump make pence do everything, that doesn't make any sense what-so-ever. Trump does 3-4 rally's per day. While Hillary does 1 a day if even that. He is working his ass off, why would he not do the same in the white house?
46% approval rating = most hated governors in recent history? Obama has had numbers around there, I guess he is one of the most hated presidents.
Hillary Supporter?
[quote=TERRYCREWS]Let's be real here if Trump were president he'd do fuck all and make Pence do all the foreign and domestic stuff (which means everything). And when Pence is one of the most hated governors in recent history for good reason, and says he wants to be like Cheney, warning signs should be hitting you in the face pretty hard right around now that he is probably a bigger issue than the big orange[/quote]
Why would Trump make pence do everything, that doesn't make any sense what-so-ever. Trump does 3-4 rally's per day. While Hillary does 1 a day if even that. He is working his ass off, why would he not do the same in the white house?
46% approval rating = most hated governors in recent history? Obama has had numbers around there, I guess he is one of the most hated presidents.
Hillary Supporter?
Why would Trump make pence do everything, that doesn't make any sense what-so-ever. Trump does 3-4 rally's per day. While Hillary does 1 a day if even that. He is working his ass off, why would he not do the same in the white house?
46% approval rating = most hated governors in recent history? Obama has had numbers around there, I guess he is one of the most hated presidents.
Hillary Supporter?
dollarlayerThe IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) has stated that since 1861 global temperatures have increased 0.6C on average. OMG! I'd love to see the data on the global temperature during the transition phase between an ice age and not an ice age. I sure as hell believe it would be a lot more than 0.6C per 150 years.
4-7°C over ~5000 years=0.0011°C/yr =0.165°C/150 years. Your IPCC quote is from 2001 though,that 0.6 has become 0.87 already. So our most recent data is 0.018°C/yr, >16x our estimates of natural temperature change rate due to interglaciation warming.
dollarlayerBBiA_duchessThat feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.
That 0.6°C will become 1 - 8°C by 2100. Hint:
Show Content
the outcome depends on how much action is taken
While that might make the european grapes real happy here are some other consequences
-arctic ice melt rate increases and raises sea levels leading to untold billions in preparatory measures and/or damages to coastal populations. Give it a couple more centuries and Greenland will be forcibly converted to a burial at sea method.
-tropical storms increase in frequency and severity
-Increased climate variability will lead to an increase in floods and droughts
-increased ocean acidity is a serious threat to pretty much anything in the ocean with a shell and has the potential to cause major damage to oceanic ecosystems as a whole
-Increased emergence and spread of tropical diseases
dollarlayerrowpiecesdamn u guys got a lot of free time
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.
You spent weeks researching and this is your level of understanding? Did you spend the entire time watching youtube "documentaries"?
[quote=dollarlayer]
The IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) has stated that since 1861 global temperatures have increased 0.6C on average. OMG! I'd love to see the data on the global temperature during the transition phase between an ice age and not an ice age. I sure as hell believe it would be a lot more than 0.6C per 150 years.[/quote]
[url=http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page3.php]4-7°C over ~5000 years[/url]=0.0011°C/yr =0.165°C/150 years. Your IPCC quote is from 2001 though,[url=http://climate.nasa.gov/system/internal_resources/details/original/647_Global_Temperature_Data_File.txt]that 0.6 has become 0.87 already[/url]. So our most recent data is 0.018°C/yr, >16x our estimates of natural temperature change rate due to interglaciation warming.
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=BBiA_duchess]That feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment[/quote]
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.[/quote]
[url=http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/sites/report/files/images/web-large/CS_average-annual-temp_global_V6_1.png]That 0.6°C will become 1 - 8°C by 2100[/url]. Hint:[spoiler]the outcome depends on how much action is taken[/spoiler]
While that might make the european grapes real happy here are some other consequences
-arctic ice melt rate increases and raises sea levels leading to untold billions in preparatory measures and/or damages to coastal populations. [url=https://www.google.com/search?q=nuuk+elevation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8]Give it a couple more centuries and Greenland will be forcibly converted to a burial at sea method[/url].
-[url=https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes/]tropical storms increase in frequency and severity[/url]
-[url=https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/ch3s3-4-3.html]Increased climate variability will lead to an increase in floods and droughts[/url]
-[url=https://data.globalchange.gov/assets/29/58/9a87d5e04ab39694b0925095954a/CS_ocean_acidification_V5.png]increased ocean acidity[/url] is a serious threat to pretty much anything in the ocean with a shell and has the potential to cause major damage to oceanic ecosystems as a whole
-[url=http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0912931#t=article]Increased emergence and spread of tropical diseases[/url]
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=rowpieces]damn u guys got a lot of free time[/quote]
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.[/quote]
You spent [i]weeks[/i] researching and this is your level of understanding? Did you spend the entire time watching youtube [size=20]"[/size]documentaries[size=20]"[/size]?
The IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) has stated that since 1861 global temperatures have increased 0.6C on average. OMG! I'd love to see the data on the global temperature during the transition phase between an ice age and not an ice age. I sure as hell believe it would be a lot more than 0.6C per 150 years.[/quote]
[url=http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page3.php]4-7°C over ~5000 years[/url]=0.0011°C/yr =0.165°C/150 years. Your IPCC quote is from 2001 though,[url=http://climate.nasa.gov/system/internal_resources/details/original/647_Global_Temperature_Data_File.txt]that 0.6 has become 0.87 already[/url]. So our most recent data is 0.018°C/yr, >16x our estimates of natural temperature change rate due to interglaciation warming.
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=BBiA_duchess]That feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment[/quote]
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.[/quote]
[url=http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/sites/report/files/images/web-large/CS_average-annual-temp_global_V6_1.png]That 0.6°C will become 1 - 8°C by 2100[/url]. Hint:[spoiler]the outcome depends on how much action is taken[/spoiler]
While that might make the european grapes real happy here are some other consequences
-arctic ice melt rate increases and raises sea levels leading to untold billions in preparatory measures and/or damages to coastal populations. [url=https://www.google.com/search?q=nuuk+elevation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8]Give it a couple more centuries and Greenland will be forcibly converted to a burial at sea method[/url].
-[url=https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes/]tropical storms increase in frequency and severity[/url]
-[url=https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/ch3s3-4-3.html]Increased climate variability will lead to an increase in floods and droughts[/url]
-[url=https://data.globalchange.gov/assets/29/58/9a87d5e04ab39694b0925095954a/CS_ocean_acidification_V5.png]increased ocean acidity[/url] is a serious threat to pretty much anything in the ocean with a shell and has the potential to cause major damage to oceanic ecosystems as a whole
-[url=http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0912931#t=article]Increased emergence and spread of tropical diseases[/url]
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=rowpieces]damn u guys got a lot of free time[/quote]
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.[/quote]
You spent [i]weeks[/i] researching and this is your level of understanding? Did you spend the entire time watching youtube [size=20]"[/size]documentaries[size=20]"[/size]?
BdonskidollarlayerThe IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) has stated that since 1861 global temperatures have increased 0.6C on average. OMG! I'd love to see the data on the global temperature during the transition phase between an ice age and not an ice age. I sure as hell believe it would be a lot more than 0.6C per 150 years.4-7° over ~5000 years=0.0011°C/yr =0.165°C/150 years. Your IPCC quote is from 2001 though,that 0.6 has become 0.87 already. So our most recent data is 0.018°C/yr, >16x our estimates of natural temperature change rate due to interglaciation warming.
dollarlayerThat [s]0.6°C[/s] 0.87°C will become 1 - 8°C by 2100. Hint:BBiA_duchessThat feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.Show Contentthe outcome depends on how much action is taken
While that might make the european grapes real happy here are some other consequences
-arctic ice melt rate increases and raises sea levels leading to untold billions in preparatory measures and/or damages to coastal populations. Give it a couple more centuries and Greenland will be forcibly converted to a burial at sea method.
-tropical storms increase in frequency and severity
-Increased climate variability will lead to an increase in floods and droughts
-increased ocean acidity is a serious threat to pretty much anything in the ocean with a shell and has the potential to cause major damage to oceanic ecosystems as a whole
-Increased emergence and spread of tropical diseases
dollarlayerYou spent weeks researching and this is your level of understanding? Did you spend the entire time watching youtube "documentaries"?rowpiecesdamn u guys got a lot of free time
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.
this is all corrupt reporting from the Hillary owned MSM, please only post links from credible journalists like Alex Jones in the future
[quote=Bdonski][quote=dollarlayer]
The IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) has stated that since 1861 global temperatures have increased 0.6C on average. OMG! I'd love to see the data on the global temperature during the transition phase between an ice age and not an ice age. I sure as hell believe it would be a lot more than 0.6C per 150 years.[/quote]
[url=http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page3.php]4-7° over ~5000 years[/url]=0.0011°C/yr =0.165°C/150 years. Your IPCC quote is from 2001 though,[url=http://climate.nasa.gov/system/internal_resources/details/original/647_Global_Temperature_Data_File.txt]that 0.6 has become 0.87 already[/url]. So our most recent data is 0.018°C/yr, >16x our estimates of natural temperature change rate due to interglaciation warming.
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=BBiA_duchess]That feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment[/quote]
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.[/quote]
[url=http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/sites/report/files/images/web-large/CS_average-annual-temp_global_V6_1.png]That [s]0.6°C[/s] 0.87°C will become 1 - 8°C by 2100[/url]. Hint:[spoiler]the outcome depends on how much action is taken[/spoiler]
While that might make the european grapes real happy here are some other consequences
-arctic ice melt rate increases and raises sea levels leading to untold billions in preparatory measures and/or damages to coastal populations. [url=https://www.google.com/search?q=nuuk+elevation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8]Give it a couple more centuries and Greenland will be forcibly converted to a burial at sea method[/url].
-[url=https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes/]tropical storms increase in frequency and severity[/url]
-[url=https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/ch3s3-4-3.html]Increased climate variability will lead to an increase in floods and droughts[/url]
-[url=https://data.globalchange.gov/assets/29/58/9a87d5e04ab39694b0925095954a/CS_ocean_acidification_V5.png]increased ocean acidity[/url] is a serious threat to pretty much anything in the ocean with a shell and has the potential to cause major damage to oceanic ecosystems as a whole
-[url=http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0912931#t=article]Increased emergence and spread of tropical diseases[/url]
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=rowpieces]damn u guys got a lot of free time[/quote]
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.[/quote]
You spent [i]weeks[/i] researching and this is your level of understanding? Did you spend the entire time watching youtube [size=20]"[/size]documentaries[size=20]"[/size]?[/quote]
this is all corrupt reporting from the Hillary owned MSM, please only post links from credible journalists like Alex Jones in the future
The IPCC (intergovernmental panel on climate change) has stated that since 1861 global temperatures have increased 0.6C on average. OMG! I'd love to see the data on the global temperature during the transition phase between an ice age and not an ice age. I sure as hell believe it would be a lot more than 0.6C per 150 years.[/quote]
[url=http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page3.php]4-7° over ~5000 years[/url]=0.0011°C/yr =0.165°C/150 years. Your IPCC quote is from 2001 though,[url=http://climate.nasa.gov/system/internal_resources/details/original/647_Global_Temperature_Data_File.txt]that 0.6 has become 0.87 already[/url]. So our most recent data is 0.018°C/yr, >16x our estimates of natural temperature change rate due to interglaciation warming.
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=BBiA_duchess]That feeling when you're so stupid you don't understand the massive impact 0.6 C makes on the environment[/quote]
Tell me more. The grapes in parts of Europe loved the warmer weather. The grave diggers in Greenland had it easier too without having to dig through solid permafrost. And we're talking likely a 5-10C increase in temperature vs today, not 0.6C.[/quote]
[url=http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/sites/report/files/images/web-large/CS_average-annual-temp_global_V6_1.png]That [s]0.6°C[/s] 0.87°C will become 1 - 8°C by 2100[/url]. Hint:[spoiler]the outcome depends on how much action is taken[/spoiler]
While that might make the european grapes real happy here are some other consequences
-arctic ice melt rate increases and raises sea levels leading to untold billions in preparatory measures and/or damages to coastal populations. [url=https://www.google.com/search?q=nuuk+elevation&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8]Give it a couple more centuries and Greenland will be forcibly converted to a burial at sea method[/url].
-[url=https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes/]tropical storms increase in frequency and severity[/url]
-[url=https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg2/en/ch3s3-4-3.html]Increased climate variability will lead to an increase in floods and droughts[/url]
-[url=https://data.globalchange.gov/assets/29/58/9a87d5e04ab39694b0925095954a/CS_ocean_acidification_V5.png]increased ocean acidity[/url] is a serious threat to pretty much anything in the ocean with a shell and has the potential to cause major damage to oceanic ecosystems as a whole
-[url=http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0912931#t=article]Increased emergence and spread of tropical diseases[/url]
[quote=dollarlayer][quote=rowpieces]damn u guys got a lot of free time[/quote]
Sometimes I do. I regularly research topics of interest to me, and a few years ago it was global warming/climate change. Spent quite a few weeks reading and watching videos and documentaries. The above video I linked hits the nail on the head.[/quote]
You spent [i]weeks[/i] researching and this is your level of understanding? Did you spend the entire time watching youtube [size=20]"[/size]documentaries[size=20]"[/size]?[/quote]
this is all corrupt reporting from the Hillary owned MSM, please only post links from credible journalists like Alex Jones in the future
dollarlayer is either a moron or the greatest shitposter ever
dollarlayer is either a moron or the greatest shitposter ever
dollarlayerWhy would Trump make pence do everything, that doesn't make any sense what-so-ever. Trump does 3-4 rally's per day. While Hillary does 1 a day if even that. He is working his ass off, why would he not do the same in the white house?
46% approval rating = most hated governors in recent history? Obama has had numbers around there, I guess he is one of the most hated presidents.
Hillary Supporter?
Not really, no. I tend to lean more towards democratic platforms, but I was set to vote for Trump before he announced Pence as his VP (and all the recent sexual assault allegations and stuff, but that came later anyways). I just happen to think that the current Trump/Pence package is a much worse deal than whatever corruption Hillary may or may not be associated with while in office. If he had picked a competent, respectable VP similar to Kasich I would've been fine voting Republican this election.
I think Owl can sum it up better than I can as an Indiana resident, but basically Pence is a religious nut who hides it pretty well. I personally don't care about religion, but when you try to sign into law shit like his RFRA, which opens up the possibility for religion based discrimination, and his staunchly anti-LGBTQ and abortion views, it's safe to say I don't agree with that one bit.
Why do I think Trump will be like GWB and not do anything? Well, I watched his debates and he's pretty solid for about 30 minutes, and then gets baited into rambling and literally trying to shittalk HRC the rest of the time. There's a difference between being non-politician-y honest and trying to wing a 90 minute debate with 30 minutes of material. Given that his focus can't even go through a 1.5 hour debate that he has weeks/months to prep for, I doubt he's able to focus on much during a presidency. I give it maybe a month or two, tops, before he lets Cheney jr. take over. A relatable analogy: Trump to politics is like when you try and recruit a dm lord to your 6s team and learn that he gets tilted to hell and back anytime he dies and thinks he got "baited". I don't want the political equivalent of a dm mongoloid as president.
[quote=dollarlayer]
Why would Trump make pence do everything, that doesn't make any sense what-so-ever. Trump does 3-4 rally's per day. While Hillary does 1 a day if even that. He is working his ass off, why would he not do the same in the white house?
46% approval rating = most hated governors in recent history? Obama has had numbers around there, I guess he is one of the most hated presidents.
Hillary Supporter?[/quote]
Not really, no. I tend to lean more towards democratic platforms, but I was set to vote for Trump before he announced Pence as his VP (and all the recent sexual assault allegations and stuff, but that came later anyways). I just happen to think that the current Trump/Pence package is a much worse deal than whatever corruption Hillary may or may not be associated with while in office. If he had picked a competent, respectable VP similar to Kasich I would've been fine voting Republican this election.
I think Owl can sum it up better than I can as an Indiana resident, but basically Pence is a religious nut who hides it pretty well. I personally don't care about religion, but when you try to sign into law shit like his RFRA, which opens up the possibility for religion based discrimination, and his staunchly anti-LGBTQ and abortion views, it's safe to say I don't agree with that one bit.
Why do I think Trump will be like GWB and not do anything? Well, I watched his debates and he's pretty solid for about 30 minutes, and then gets baited into rambling and literally trying to shittalk HRC the rest of the time. There's a difference between being non-politician-y honest and trying to wing a 90 minute debate with 30 minutes of material. Given that his focus can't even go through a 1.5 hour debate that he has weeks/months to prep for, I doubt he's able to focus on much during a presidency. I give it maybe a month or two, tops, before he lets Cheney jr. take over. A relatable analogy: Trump to politics is like when you try and recruit a dm lord to your 6s team and learn that he gets tilted to hell and back anytime he dies and thinks he got "baited". I don't want the political equivalent of a dm mongoloid as president.
Why would Trump make pence do everything, that doesn't make any sense what-so-ever. Trump does 3-4 rally's per day. While Hillary does 1 a day if even that. He is working his ass off, why would he not do the same in the white house?
46% approval rating = most hated governors in recent history? Obama has had numbers around there, I guess he is one of the most hated presidents.
Hillary Supporter?[/quote]
Not really, no. I tend to lean more towards democratic platforms, but I was set to vote for Trump before he announced Pence as his VP (and all the recent sexual assault allegations and stuff, but that came later anyways). I just happen to think that the current Trump/Pence package is a much worse deal than whatever corruption Hillary may or may not be associated with while in office. If he had picked a competent, respectable VP similar to Kasich I would've been fine voting Republican this election.
I think Owl can sum it up better than I can as an Indiana resident, but basically Pence is a religious nut who hides it pretty well. I personally don't care about religion, but when you try to sign into law shit like his RFRA, which opens up the possibility for religion based discrimination, and his staunchly anti-LGBTQ and abortion views, it's safe to say I don't agree with that one bit.
Why do I think Trump will be like GWB and not do anything? Well, I watched his debates and he's pretty solid for about 30 minutes, and then gets baited into rambling and literally trying to shittalk HRC the rest of the time. There's a difference between being non-politician-y honest and trying to wing a 90 minute debate with 30 minutes of material. Given that his focus can't even go through a 1.5 hour debate that he has weeks/months to prep for, I doubt he's able to focus on much during a presidency. I give it maybe a month or two, tops, before he lets Cheney jr. take over. A relatable analogy: Trump to politics is like when you try and recruit a dm lord to your 6s team and learn that he gets tilted to hell and back anytime he dies and thinks he got "baited". I don't want the political equivalent of a dm mongoloid as president.
@812 -- Sorry bud, but you are not convincing me of anything. Anything I argue, I've already made up my mind on. Your views, opinions, and sources are meaningless to me, especially when they are government sources. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jzBWmpzifc
@812 -- Sorry bud, but you are not convincing me of anything. Anything I argue, I've already made up my mind on. Your views, opinions, and sources are meaningless to me, especially when they are government sources. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jzBWmpzifc
dollarlayer@812 -- Sorry bud, but you are not convincing me of anything. Anything I argue, I've already made up my mind on. Your views, opinions, and sources are meaningless to me, especially when they are government sources. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jzBWmpzifc
refer to
AvastIt's pointless to argue with this guy over facts
Why do people bother responding to someone this dense. I'm pretty sure he's just a troll at this point.
[quote=dollarlayer]@812 -- Sorry bud, but you are not convincing me of anything. Anything I argue, I've already made up my mind on. Your views, opinions, and sources are meaningless to me, especially when they are government sources. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jzBWmpzifc[/quote]
refer to
[quote=Avast]It's pointless to argue with this guy over facts[/quote]
Why do people bother responding to someone this dense. I'm pretty sure he's just a troll at this point.
refer to
[quote=Avast]It's pointless to argue with this guy over facts[/quote]
Why do people bother responding to someone this dense. I'm pretty sure he's just a troll at this point.
Also as a side note dollar might be the most feels over reals person i've met on tf2 forum despite it being filled with furries and weebs, all the while proclaiming to be a staunch "anti-pc" advocate.
l to the o to the l
Also as a side note dollar might be the most feels over reals person i've met on tf2 forum despite it being filled with furries and weebs, all the while proclaiming to be a staunch "anti-pc" advocate.
l to the o to the l
l to the o to the l
This thread has been locked.