You have been banned from the ESEA network. (Ban #74236)
Reason:
Any attempt to evade a previously placed ban is not tolerated.
Karma Penalty: -100
Expiration: Mar 11th (1st offense)
Please email support@esportsea.com if you have any questions concerning this ban.
If you do not include your IP address and user alias we will be unable to assist you.
http://news.esea.net/users/344689
Rip nemrawd and swatt
You have been banned from the ESEA network. (Ban #74236)
Reason:
Any attempt to evade a previously placed ban is not tolerated.
Karma Penalty: -100
Expiration: Mar 11th (1st offense)
Please email support@esportsea.com if you have any questions concerning this ban.
If you do not include your IP address and user alias we will be unable to assist you.
http://news.esea.net/users/344689
Rip nemrawd and swatt
swatt and him both victims of caseythecat rip
swatt and him both victims of caseythecat rip
ESEA really needs to take charge with the whole "caseythecat" situation. Their automatic system is clearly not working in this case, and it's embarrassing that they're letting it run amok for so long.
ESEA really needs to take charge with the whole "caseythecat" situation. Their automatic system is clearly not working in this case, and it's embarrassing that they're letting it run amok for so long.
8-15-3 damn that's some record.
8-15-3 damn that's some record.
Yeah its kind of ridiculous how when provided full proof that it was not there fault and the other guy admitted he did it, they still won't do anything about the bans.
Yeah its kind of ridiculous how when provided full proof that it was not there fault and the other guy admitted he did it, they still won't do anything about the bans.
Tone-PotYeah its kind of ridiculous how when provided full proof that it was not there fault and the other guy admitted he did it, they still won't do anything about the bans.
Agreed. They know Swatt and the other guy are innocent, yet they won't do anything about it. I have no experience running gaming organizations, but I don't understand the logic behind leaving them banned.
[quote=Tone-Pot]Yeah its kind of ridiculous how when provided full proof that it was not there fault and the other guy admitted he did it, they still won't do anything about the bans.[/quote]
Agreed. They know Swatt and the other guy are innocent, yet they won't do anything about it. I have no experience running gaming organizations, but I don't understand the logic behind leaving them banned.
GUYS
what if the CS admins are encouraging this
GUYS
what if the CS admins are encouraging this
miwoESEA really needs to take charge with the whole "caseythecat" situation. Their automatic system is clearly not working in this case, and it's embarrassing that they're letting it run amok for so long.
What happened?
[quote=miwo]ESEA really needs to take charge with the whole "caseythecat" situation. Their automatic system is clearly not working in this case, and it's embarrassing that they're letting it run amok for so long.[/quote]
What happened?
Why are you saying "RIP nemrawd" in third person? Anyways, it wasn't your fault or swatt's fault that you got hacked by someone and banned. Actually ban evading in order to prove your innocence of ban evading is probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard of though.
Why are you saying "RIP nemrawd" in third person? Anyways, it wasn't your fault or swatt's fault that you got hacked by someone and banned. Actually ban evading in order to prove your innocence of ban evading is probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard of though.
BreadWhat happened?
Swatt got banned for "ban evasion." ESEA claimed that he was a CS player named "caseythecat" evading a previous ban. Except Swatt had CSpugged ON-CLIENT with caseythecat.
Evidently Nemrawd was also banned for the same charge. And now another person as well.
[quote=Bread]What happened?[/quote]
Swatt got banned for "ban evasion." ESEA claimed that he was a CS player named "caseythecat" evading a previous ban. Except Swatt had CSpugged ON-CLIENT with caseythecat.
Evidently Nemrawd was also banned for the same charge. And now another person as well.
What if an invite team goes to a LAN that uses a single IP and then someone hacks on client there? Would everybody there get banned? If so that's awesome and I think someone should do it to show how wonderful the ESEA league's ban policy is.
What if an invite team goes to a LAN that uses a single IP and then someone hacks on client there? Would everybody there get banned? If so that's awesome and I think someone should do it to show how wonderful the ESEA league's ban policy is.
Do it at ESEA LAN so they actually notice the problem. They won't notice it with TF2 players only.
Do it at ESEA LAN so they actually notice the problem. They won't notice it with TF2 players only.