for me the crossbow is the most retarded gun
Upvote
Upvoted
-16
Downvote
Downvoted
most retarded weapon in your opinion
posted in
The Dumpster
Every flamethrower. I love not being able to kill someone who's worse than me because I hadn't equipped hitscan.
Every flamethrower. I [i]love[/i] not being able to kill someone who's worse than me because I hadn't equipped hitscan.
I suppose 'retarded' has multiple subjective meanings in this context, but the Escape Plan is badly designed. I think Tagg once voiced irritation that the Escape Plan has a built-in anti-escape mechanism (no damage falloff, 135% damage hits from mid-to-long-range). A straight damage vulnerability penalty would be more appropriate. This almost certainly won't happen, since it's rate of usage is high.
I suppose 'retarded' has multiple subjective meanings in this context, but the Escape Plan is badly designed. I think Tagg once voiced irritation that the Escape Plan has a built-in anti-escape mechanism (no damage falloff, 135% damage hits from mid-to-long-range). A straight damage [i]vulnerability[/i] penalty would be more appropriate. This almost certainly won't happen, since it's rate of usage is high.
loch n load its a weapon that basically contradicts what tf2 stands for
loch n load its a weapon that basically contradicts what tf2 stands for
This
yak404iron bomber
Also, the Sharpened Volcano Fragment, retarded because it's incredibly bad
This
[quote=yak404]iron bomber[/quote]
Also, the Sharpened Volcano Fragment, retarded because it's incredibly bad
[quote=yak404]iron bomber[/quote]
Also, the Sharpened Volcano Fragment, retarded because it's incredibly bad
HalI suppose 'retarded' has multiple subjective meanings in this context, but the Escape Plan is badly designed. I think Tagg once voiced irritation that the Escape Plan has a built-in anti-escape mechanism (no damage falloff, 135% damage hits from mid-to-long-range). A straight damage penalty would be more appropriate. This almost certainly won't happen, since it's rate of usage is high.
just shootem
[quote=Hal]I suppose 'retarded' has multiple subjective meanings in this context, but the Escape Plan is badly designed. I think Tagg once voiced irritation that the Escape Plan has a built-in anti-escape mechanism (no damage falloff, 135% damage hits from mid-to-long-range). A straight damage penalty would be more appropriate. This almost certainly won't happen, since it's rate of usage is high.[/quote]
just shootem
just shootem
i used to hate the dragons fury because it had no reloads but now it got nerfed and i can get mad about other pyro weapons now :)
i used to hate the dragons fury because it had no reloads but now it got nerfed and i can get mad about other pyro weapons now :)
shields, not even a weapon and its worse than playing against a demo with a machine gun
shields, not even a weapon and its worse than playing against a demo with a machine gun
https://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/images/0/04/Wrangler_RED.png
Why is this a thing
[img]https://wiki.teamfortress.com/w/images/0/04/Wrangler_RED.png[/img]
Why is this a thing
Why is this a thing
HalI suppose 'retarded' has multiple subjective meanings in this context, but the Escape Plan is badly designed. I think Tagg once voiced irritation that the Escape Plan has a built-in anti-escape mechanism (no damage falloff, 135% damage hits from mid-to-long-range). A straight damage vulnerability penalty would be more appropriate. This almost certainly won't happen, since it's rate of usage is high.
What? It's one of the most cleverly designed weapons in the game. Risk vs reward is really well balanced.
For me, the Natascha. Just shit to play against.
[quote=Hal]I suppose 'retarded' has multiple subjective meanings in this context, but the Escape Plan is badly designed. I think Tagg once voiced irritation that the Escape Plan has a built-in anti-escape mechanism (no damage falloff, 135% damage hits from mid-to-long-range). A straight damage [i]vulnerability[/i] penalty would be more appropriate. This almost certainly won't happen, since it's rate of usage is high.[/quote]
What? It's one of the most cleverly designed weapons in the game. Risk vs reward is really well balanced.
For me, the Natascha. Just shit to play against.
What? It's one of the most cleverly designed weapons in the game. Risk vs reward is really well balanced.
For me, the Natascha. Just shit to play against.
Direct hit
easiest weapon to airshot with but thats not enough so valve added mini crits on airborne targets.
Direct hit
easiest weapon to airshot with but thats not enough so valve added mini crits on airborne targets.
easiest weapon to airshot with but thats not enough so valve added mini crits on airborne targets.
flyingbuddyLoose cannon pre nerf was pretty disgusting
what about loose cannon pre-pre-nerf i.e. on launch
[quote=flyingbuddy]Loose cannon pre nerf was pretty disgusting[/quote]
what about loose cannon pre-pre-nerf i.e. on launch
what about loose cannon pre-pre-nerf i.e. on launch
StylaxWhat? It's one of the most cleverly designed weapons in the game. Risk vs reward is really well balanced.
For me, the Natascha. Just shit to play against.
I like risk/reward. I just don't like the concept of Soldier gaining the utility while hurt and taking damage with no falloff. Sacrificing your ability to shoot/reload is fair enough, but being two- or three-tapped down from distance is extremely annoying. I suppose one could argue that this just requires more careful judgment as to when to use it, so it's a matter of perspective/opinion.
However, I hereby withdraw my submission and concur with you; why is the Natascha in this game?
[quote=Stylax]
What? It's one of the most cleverly designed weapons in the game. Risk vs reward is really well balanced.
For me, the Natascha. Just shit to play against.[/quote]
I like risk/reward. I just don't like the concept of Soldier gaining the utility while hurt and taking damage with no falloff. Sacrificing your ability to shoot/reload is fair enough, but being two- or three-tapped down from distance is extremely annoying. I suppose one could argue that this just requires more careful judgment as to when to use it, so it's a matter of perspective/opinion.
However, I hereby withdraw my submission and concur with you; why is the Natascha in this game?
What? It's one of the most cleverly designed weapons in the game. Risk vs reward is really well balanced.
For me, the Natascha. Just shit to play against.[/quote]
I like risk/reward. I just don't like the concept of Soldier gaining the utility while hurt and taking damage with no falloff. Sacrificing your ability to shoot/reload is fair enough, but being two- or three-tapped down from distance is extremely annoying. I suppose one could argue that this just requires more careful judgment as to when to use it, so it's a matter of perspective/opinion.
However, I hereby withdraw my submission and concur with you; why is the Natascha in this game?
copperrDirect hit
easiest weapon to airshot with but thats not enough so valve added mini crits on airborne targets.
paging Unicorn Wizard
[quote=copperr]Direct hit
easiest weapon to airshot with but thats not enough so valve added mini crits on airborne targets.[/quote]
paging Unicorn Wizard
easiest weapon to airshot with but thats not enough so valve added mini crits on airborne targets.[/quote]
paging Unicorn Wizard
Sydney sleeper literally rewards people who can't headshot on sniper.
Sydney sleeper literally rewards people who can't headshot on sniper.
[img]http://digilander.libero.it/gdcgroup/MSN%20Live%20Spaces/BUONFERRAGOSTOATT_B6DB/Suicide_gun.jpg[/img]
Please
sign in through STEAM
to post a comment.