http://i.imgur.com/zlc7jej.jpg
i just got rid of mine lol too much effort having one

unless you prep an enterprise LTSB ISO to completely remove cortana & other miscellaneous performance hogging bullshit, i wouldn't touch windows 10 with a 10-foot pole.

also, that site was registering double-clicks erroneously for me (two quick clicks wouldn't register as a double-click, but two delayed single-clicks would). you need a different (preferably low-level) testing suite. i have a few programs i used a while back to properly vet mouse performance; i'll send them to you after finals.

happy birthday
if u don't pick him up, u will be cursed to never have a birthday..........

here im gona put my frieoahd on m yk eyabrod
uyjh78

which video corroborates your dao the best
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y155Lz0Rz-s
or
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFgIFZA8r5M

hey jakalighting i was inspired by u so i made my own fps guide by quoting u here is my fps guide it is quoted but it is mine thank u for reading

wtf LOL

cool stuff

since you care about hockey, i wouldn't if i were you.

i'm pretty lax about studying for finals.

i try to reconstruct most of my courses' materials from well-established sets of atomic facts to minimize the amount i have to memorize. during this process, i'll identify the most abstract concepts from each course and construct a memory palace (or, more trivially but less effectively, use mnemonics) to memorize sequential processes (i.e. mathematical algorithms, historical timelines, interactions between objects, etc.) that haven't already been ingrained &/or cannot be trivially decomposed (usually because they're pedagogically local in scope).

video games can be played at any age. on the other hand, your chances to play hockey seriously will most certainly decline substantially as you grow older & have more real-life commitments to manage. and since it's an actual physical sport, you may completely miss out if you don't commit while you're still (relatively) young.

if you care about hockey, then just focus on your real-life well-being & prioritize hockey as your main hobby. being distracted by two competitive hobbies simultaneously is just going to divide up your attention unnecessarily & inhibit your potential.

if you never planned on taking hockey seriously, then you need to realistically consider whether your attitude aligns with the expectations of your hockey team & your prospective tf2 team.

most importantly, don't stress yourself out just to make an "iffy schedule" work.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98RpPFw6Os0

i sexually identify as a tsundere shark
http://i.imgbox.com/gtLnHBL0.jpg

a bit off-topic, but when ratz instagib had somewhat of a stable population, the best player i knew on that game pounded hard on ~50 fov

and then you have people playing with rawinput 0 on tf2 that are natural slayers

THIS WORLD ISN'T LOGICAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i think conflating issues regarding implicit identity with those of racism is not only dangerous, but entirely fallacious.

activism against racism and sexism (namely feminism) deal with biases and discrimination against factors of identity that cannot be readily hidden when engaging in discourse. in other words, these forms of activism are concerned about why discourse over non-identity topics are inhibited due to external factors that are readily visible to every participant. this overview is meant to be obvious; these forms of activism need to be rigorously defined so that we can tackle the propriety of activism of preferred pronouns.

unlike skin color & gender, implicit identity, such as "preferred pronouns" and "sexuality", needs to be explicitly introduced into discourse for participants to be aware of it. as long as the laws classifying the acts of discrimination are very narrow and clear (i.e. explicitly harassing someone for identifying, or for assuming they identify, as gay, straight, or feeling empowered by being referred to in a neutral manner), then what goodboy said on the first page is fine.

yet, professional academics and psychologists are still observably arguing over the propriety of the recently instituted discrimination laws, and it's most certainly not because they're bigoted nor because they're trying to dehumanize people (why the fuck would you pursue a PHD if you didn't care about society???). the laws in contention clearly weren't well-vetted nor rigorously peer-reviewed by psychologists; these laws were arguably enacted as a knee-jerk response to a poorly detailed problem. thus, the factors that constitute discrimination against implicit identity must be reevaluated as neutrally & unemotionally as possible.

vagueness in discrimination laws allow those with malicious intentions to derail conversations and/or to force participants to beat around the bush by establishing their implicit identities before being productive (just look at how fucking long the initial speakers took in OP's video before any actual arguments were made). thus, professional academics like Dr. Peterson aren't trying to disrespect those who have unique personality and identity traits (who doesn't???). instead, they're trying to argue that everyone's rights can be secured by keeping identity-related topics separated from non-identity topics.

in conclusion, fuck your & everyone else's implicit identity. we're all going to die. stop caring so much about your stupid individual existence. i don't care if you like dicks; major in math so i can give an iota of a fuck about you. FUCK.