have you had any sleep? pls be safe
Account Details | |
---|---|
SteamID64 | 76561198020242938 |
SteamID3 | [U:1:59977210] |
SteamID32 | STEAM_0:0:29988605 |
Country | France |
Signed Up | November 6, 2012 |
Last Posted | November 13, 2024 at 6:16 AM |
Posts | 850 (0.2 per day) |
Game Settings | |
---|---|
In-game Sensitivity | |
Windows Sensitivity | |
Raw Input | |
DPI |
|
Resolution |
|
Refresh Rate |
Hardware Peripherals | |
---|---|
Mouse | |
Keyboard | |
Mousepad | |
Headphones | |
Monitor |
https://clips.twitch.tv/GoldenMoistDunlinDuDudu
what we should do is get all head admins in the same agar.io game and whoever swallows all other leagues gets to be the only league
probably my fastest dumpster, proud of that one to be quite honest
AnaThonI don't really get this honestly. I think having local leagues representing its people has been working fine. What's bringing some sort of an international bureau into it going to accomplish? Who does it benefit?
The direct benefit for players is to have a chance for their voice and concerns to be heard when decisions that affect the entire community are being taken.
This is all under the assumption that major leagues are considering and/or making an effort to unify how 6v6 is played, which seems to be the case after talking with Aoshi (ETF2L) and Fozzle (ozfortress).
Other benefits don't necessarily directly apply to players, but I can foresee communication between admins and to the community being easier to manage, admins will be able to share common issues or similar workloads, players will be able to trust decisions coming from a trustable process, etc.
AnaThonFor the rest of us it seems it'd just make it harder to have things we like happen. If, for example, eu players like or want something that the others don't, what will happen?
I understand that concern and it's definitely part of the huge list of things we need to hash out, I don't think I can give you a satisfying answer as this point, but this is something we will try to figure out. I don't exactly recall of any such cases happening ever since the global whitelist was put in place though, but you might know otherwise.
It's possible that we don't find an answer, we're very much aware of that, if that's the case, we will direct our entire focus on running a stable and competitive NA league in the style of ETF2L and ozfortress, which is already our primary goal.
MrSmithers96agree with anathon, ETF2L and ozfortress have both had a full decade to decide on their own rulesets maplists and whitelist, and its happened very organically over that time
seems silly to waste 10 years of progress in those regions because some people are still hung up on tf2 esports ideas
I might be mistaken in understanding what you meant, do you believe we would force ETF2L and ozfortress to change drastically in order to achieve unity? If that's the case, and we apologize for not being clearer about it, then it is not something we intend or even expect, I would say that's actually the opposite of what we would want, they have worked so well for so long and we obviously would want to benefit from that. The rationale is that these leagues aren't exactly different from one another, in their rulesets and philosophies, our goal would be to find a common ground, if possible, and duplicate it in the North American region, if that's what the players want.
Thank you for your questions, I would like to encourage more people to voice their opinions and experiences playing ESEA, you're also more than welcome to any of us (names in the OP) if you'd prefer to share it privately, or even if you'd like to have a conversation. As said previously, our goal is to provide a great league for players to land on when ESEA leaves us and your feedback matters to us.
PeteIf you're inviting b4nny, I hope that other top players from multiple different teams are both being invited and actually showing up
Oh, dear..