Upvote Upvoted 8 Downvote Downvoted
1 2 3 4
Reaction time
posted in Off Topic
1
#1
0 Frags +

http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/index.php

My average is 219ms :(

http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/index.php

My average is 219ms :(
2
#2
0 Frags +

269ms

269ms
3
#3
-1 Frags +

i got 173.2 :D this is super fun to just continually do LOL

i got 173.2 :D this is super fun to just continually do LOL
4
#4
-1 Frags +

306 ms :D :D :D

306 ms :D :D :D
5
#5
8 Frags +

172

for some reason it's gone down as i've gotten older

172

for some reason it's gone down as i've gotten older
6
#6
0 Frags +

250 ms...

250 ms...
7
#7
-1 Frags +

285..no wonder im bad at video games

285..no wonder im bad at video games
8
#8
0 Frags +

191

191
9
#9
0 Frags +

average of 5 clicks: 247.4
fastest: 228 :(

average of 5 clicks: 247.4
fastest: 228 :(
10
#10
6 Frags +

my fastest was 180
my worst was 300
they both felt exactly the same
i blame my hardware

my fastest was 180
my worst was 300
they both felt exactly the same
i blame my hardware
11
#11
0 Frags +

I'm getting an average of 230, but I'm sure my LCD display has something to do with that.

I'm getting an average of 230, but I'm sure my LCD display has something to do with that.
12
#12
0 Frags +

187.4 avg first time through.
Worthless in terms of applying to my gameplay though because I move my mouse like crazy to react faster.

187.4 avg first time through.
Worthless in terms of applying to my gameplay though because I move my mouse like crazy to react faster.
13
#13
2 Frags +

Doing the math, if I had a 120Hz monitor instead of 60Hz and had my mouse on 1000Hz instead of 250Hz, it would drop my times by around 11ms. So I'd still be at 274ms l0l

Doing the math, if I had a 120Hz monitor instead of 60Hz and had my mouse on 1000Hz instead of 250Hz, it would drop my times by around 11ms. So I'd still be at 274ms l0l
14
#14
0 Frags +

241 avg

241 avg
15
#15
0 Frags +

fastest 158 slowest 268 gg crt vs lcd

fastest 158 slowest 268 gg crt vs lcd
16
#16
0 Frags +

284 average

fastest 236, slowest 392

this is like one of those addictive flash games :|

284 average

fastest 236, slowest 392

this is like one of those addictive flash games :|
17
#17
0 Frags +

average 180.8

average 180.8
18
#18
0 Frags +

Average: 236.4
Fastest: 214.9

Average: 236.4
Fastest: 214.9
19
#19
0 Frags +

averaged like 260
need a 120 hz monitor

averaged like 260
need a 120 hz monitor
20
#20
0 Frags +

my average time went from like 245 to 195 when i covered up the text

my average time went from like 245 to 195 when i covered up the text
21
#21
4 Frags +
enigma172

for some reason it's gone down as i've gotten older

I read an article that was talking about how reaction time improves until you're about 28 and then it starts to degrade from there, that could be why.

[quote=enigma]172

for some reason it's gone down as i've gotten older[/quote]
I read an article that was talking about how reaction time improves until you're about 28 and then it starts to degrade from there, that could be why.
22
#22
-1 Frags +

170

eh

170

eh
23
#23
0 Frags +

256.6

256.6
24
#24
0 Frags +

Got 304. I just did it multiple times and now I keep getting 230 :P

Got 304. I just did it multiple times and now I keep getting 230 :P
25
#25
0 Frags +

189

189
26
#26
0 Frags +

around 250

around 250
27
#27
0 Frags +

fastest is like 230 slowest is like 300

fastest is like 230 slowest is like 300
28
#28
0 Frags +

accidentally double posted

accidentally double posted
29
#29
-1 Frags +

163

163
30
#30
-18 Frags +

I find this threads lack of +/- frags disturbing

I find this threads lack of +/- frags disturbing
1 2 3 4
Please sign in through STEAM to post a comment.