TL Harbors Pedophiles

#61

WILDFIRE

7 Frags – +

ArchaeologyThey’ll call me insensitive but never “wrong.”

Personally I'm going to go with "fat retard"

[quote=Archaeology]They’ll call me insensitive but never “wrong.”[/quote]
Personally I'm going to go with "fat retard"

#62

Archaeology

-18 Frags – +

eleanorArchaeologyeleanorArchaeologyI've hung around both extensively.
I'd rather a child hang around vexfresh/any 'racist, sexist, bigot' than any transgender. Too many of them are pedophiles. Many such cases.
you sound like a racist sexist bigot trying to convince people to let you around childrenI’m 17. I’ve hung around both groups of people as a child and I’m speaking from experience. You’ll have to cope with the unfortunate reality.
oh ur 17, my bad, for a second i thought you were actually trying to use your anectodal experience (which i highly doubt actually happened) as a way to generalize an entire people.

ill give u a pass since ur 17 and clearly a fucking moron

Let’s (doubt) that anything ever happened to the 17 year old
You sound like a groomer. Are you a groomer?
You have a horrible mindset, I’d hate for you to talk to someone that was a serious victim.

[quote=eleanor][quote=Archaeology][quote=eleanor][quote=Archaeology]
I've hung around both extensively.
I'd rather a child hang around vexfresh/any 'racist, sexist, bigot' than any transgender. Too many of them are pedophiles. Many such cases.
[/quote]

you sound like a racist sexist bigot trying to convince people to let you around children[/quote]
I’m 17. I’ve hung around both groups of people as a child and I’m speaking from experience. You’ll have to cope with the unfortunate reality.[/quote]

oh ur 17, my bad, for a second i thought you were actually trying to use your anectodal experience (which i highly doubt actually happened) as a way to generalize an entire people.

ill give u a pass since ur 17 and clearly a fucking moron[/quote]
Let’s (doubt) that anything ever happened to the 17 year old
You sound like a groomer. Are you a groomer?
You have a horrible mindset, I’d hate for you to talk to someone that was a serious victim.

#63

hallu

13 Frags – +

I am a serious victim of reading Archaeology’s retarded posts, AMA

#64

eee

40 Frags – +

amazed that i can grow up and come back to read this forum and still find a new crop of teenagers exploring new depths of intellectualism in the tf2 community

#65

Punks

-11 Frags – +

takes a pedo to know a pedo ig time to watch this thread devolved into trans = pedo debate again zzz.... @.@

#66

eleanor

13 Frags – +

ArchaeologyLet’s (doubt) that anything ever happened to the 17 year old
You sound like a groomer. Are you a groomer?
You have a horrible mindset, I’d hate for you to talk to someone that was a serious victim.

i would hate for you to be around anybody with a pulse, you just radiate stupidity and hatred, u nasty creature.

[quote=Archaeology]
Let’s (doubt) that anything ever happened to the 17 year old
You sound like a groomer. Are you a groomer?
You have a horrible mindset, I’d hate for you to talk to someone that was a serious victim.[/quote]

i would hate for you to be around anybody with a pulse, you just radiate stupidity and hatred, u nasty creature.

#67

Natalexei

7 Frags – +

ArchaeologyLet’s (doubt) that anything ever happened to the 17 year old
You sound like a groomer. Are you a groomer?
You have a horrible mindset, I’d hate for you to talk to someone that was a serious victim.

you would make an amazing case study to demonstrate how badly the 'no child left behind' act failed

[quote=Archaeology]
Let’s (doubt) that anything ever happened to the 17 year old
You sound like a groomer. Are you a groomer?
You have a horrible mindset, I’d hate for you to talk to someone that was a serious victim.[/quote]
you would make an amazing case study to demonstrate how badly the 'no child left behind' act failed

#68

Rocko

-6 Frags – +

ArchaeologydbkEvery LGBT or transgender I’ve met on TF2, comp or casual, was either a complete social shut-in or a porn addicted chronically online individual.
Bro... Go outside

[quote=Archaeology][quote=dbk]
Every LGBT or transgender I’ve met on TF2, comp or casual, was either a complete social shut-in or a porn addicted chronically online individual. [/quote]

Bro... Go outside

#69

cyg

6 Frags – +

BrightWholesomeConsentistSaphbanned pedo accuses people of being pedos ggs.
Posted at July 17th 2024 at 1:42AM EDT
edited Jan 28, 2025 at 3:21 AM EST

This community will die out completely if we continue to let it be ran by people who don't play the game or don't actually care about being a part of the community besides when they're being edge lords and whiny nerds in random discord vc's (M17). This isn't just for rgl, but for every sub-community. The people we let admin for Tf2CC and newbie cup, the people we let run pug servers, and the people that are known sex offenders, racists, or any other form of unforgivable weirdo behavior being able to play with and around us. I have never been in a community so intent on constantly complaining about how things are, and have always been, without doing anything about it.

delete your post before your embarrassed any further in your contradictory statements. Pathetic.

Rgl admins, Tf2cc admins, and M17 help bring in an influx of new players and work as volunteers, what have you done to help the community besides making this post and getting banned for cheating? This thread is pointless, you should just report them through the links posted by mariomanz

[quote=BrightWholesomeConsentist][quote=Saph]banned pedo accuses people of being pedos ggs.[/quote]

[url=https://www.teamfortress.tv/64762/a-thank-you-letter-to-rgl#5]Posted at July 17th 2024 at 1:42AM EDT[/url]
[url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240717231913/https://www.teamfortress.tv/64762/a-thank-you-letter-to-rgl#5]edited Jan 28, 2025 at 3:21 AM EST[/url]

This community will die out completely if we continue to let it be ran by people who don't play the game or don't actually care about being a part of the community besides when they're being edge lords and whiny nerds in random discord vc's (M17). This isn't just for rgl, but for every sub-community. The people we let admin for Tf2CC and newbie cup, the people we let run pug servers, [u][b]and the people that are known sex offenders, racists, or any other form of unforgivable weirdo behavior being able to play with and around us. I have never been in a community so intent on constantly complaining about how things are, and have always been, without doing anything about it.[/b][/u]

delete your post before your embarrassed any further in your contradictory statements. Pathetic.[/quote]

Rgl admins, Tf2cc admins, and M17 help bring in an influx of new players and work as volunteers, what have you done to help the community besides making this post and getting banned for cheating? This thread is pointless, you should just report them through the links posted by mariomanz

#70

NoNoeWay

7 Frags – +

cyg Rgl admins, Tf2cc admins, and M17 help bring in an influx of new players and work as volunteers, what have you done to help the community besides making this post and getting banned for cheating?

They are, albeit improperly, directly pulling a quote from Saph to point out the original author's hypocrisy (which has been deleted for a while because it was just an impulsive post).

[quote=cyg] Rgl admins, Tf2cc admins, and M17 help bring in an influx of new players and work as volunteers, what have you done to help the community besides making this post and getting banned for cheating? [/quote]

They are, albeit improperly, directly pulling a quote from Saph to point out the original author's hypocrisy (which has been deleted for a while because it was just an impulsive post).

#71

untamed

-7 Frags – +

NoNoeWaycyg Rgl admins, Tf2cc admins, and M17 help bring in an influx of new players and work as volunteers, what have you done to help the community besides making this post and getting banned for cheating?
They are, albeit improperly, directly pulling a quote from Saph to point out the original author's hypocrisy (which has been deleted for a while because it was just an impulsive post).

I didn’t think I have to say this since the thread being referenced has been dead for a while, but I’ll say that after I made it I regretted it almost instantaneously and no longer stand by it which is why I deleted my texts on it. I also apologize for me inconveniencing any RGL admin during that outburst. So with that, can I respectfully not be referenced to something I don’t want to be associated with anymore? Thanks.

[quote=NoNoeWay][quote=cyg] Rgl admins, Tf2cc admins, and M17 help bring in an influx of new players and work as volunteers, what have you done to help the community besides making this post and getting banned for cheating? [/quote]

They are, albeit improperly, directly pulling a quote from Saph to point out the original author's hypocrisy (which has been deleted for a while because it was just an impulsive post).[/quote]

I didn’t think I have to say this since the thread being referenced has been dead for a while, but I’ll say that after I made it I regretted it almost instantaneously and no longer stand by it which is why I deleted my texts on it. I also apologize for me inconveniencing any RGL admin during that outburst. So with that, can I respectfully not be referenced to something I don’t want to be associated with anymore? Thanks.

#72

-michaelw

6 Frags – +

anyone know of any dope tf2 hitsounds? i hate to say it, i'm sick of the q3a hitsound!

#73

BrightWholesomeConsentist

5 Frags – +

cygThis thread is pointless, you should just report them through the links posted by mariomanz

I had already waited for more than 2 months too see if any repercussions would be given too the players in question, and they hadn't, so therefor I had made this thread. Reporting had already been done months ago. Nothing happened. So I decided too make a thread about it.

[quote=cyg]This thread is pointless, you should just report them through the links posted by mariomanz[/quote]

I had already waited for more than 2 months too see if any repercussions would be given too the players in question, and they hadn't, so therefor I had made this thread. Reporting had already been done months ago. Nothing happened. So I decided too make a thread about it.

#74

Natalexei

9 Frags – +

I don’t think anything would happen unless a victim comes forward and provides evidence of anything more than following extremely questionable twitter/bluesky artists, rgl doesnt police follows afaik

absolutely gross accounts though, not-so-kindly get help and spend time outside if you follow those or anything like it

I don’t think anything would happen unless a victim comes forward and provides evidence of anything more than following extremely questionable twitter/bluesky artists, rgl doesnt police follows afaik

absolutely gross accounts though, not-so-kindly get help and spend time outside if you follow those or anything like it

#75

Rendoas

-20 Frags – +

How old are you, OP? Anti and proship discourse is probably the most chronically online teenager shit anyone could give a fuck about. You're mad about consenting adults having diaper kinks in the privacy of their own designated-adult spaces. I looked at the artist in question and saw zero sexual art of children, so why is this the hill you're choosing to die on? Try having a good, long think about why you find this stuff upsetting. Is it because you find it icky, or is it because there's actual harm being caused? If these adults were actively and purposefully sharing pornography with minors then that would be a real problem. Cartoons drawn by horny weirdos should be way down on your list of shit to worry about.

#76

Sale_boat

17 Frags – +

RendoasHow old are you, OP?..

If your into freaky weirdo diaper porn you 100% have cp

[quote=Rendoas]How old are you, OP?..[/quote]
If your into freaky weirdo diaper porn you 100% have cp

#77

subhuman

7 Frags – +

RendoasHow old are you, OP? Anti and proship discourse is probably the most chronically online teenager shit anyone could give a fuck about. You're mad about consenting adults having diaper kinks in the privacy of their own designated-adult spaces. I looked at the artist in question and saw zero sexual art of children, so why is this the hill you're choosing to die on? Try having a good, long think about why you find this stuff upsetting. Is it because you find it icky, or is it because there's actual harm being caused? If these adults were actively and purposefully sharing pornography with minors then that would be a real problem. Cartoons drawn by horny weirdos should be way down on your list of shit to worry about.

we're not looking at a diaper fetish in a vacuum. we're seeing that AND the lolicon/babyfur shit AND the zoophilia shit. the diaper fetish art is just an extra detail on top of the much more damning evidence.

[quote=Rendoas]How old are you, OP? Anti and proship discourse is probably the most chronically online teenager shit anyone could give a fuck about. You're mad about consenting adults having diaper kinks in the privacy of their own designated-adult spaces. I looked at the artist in question and saw zero sexual art of children, so why is this the hill you're choosing to die on? Try having a good, long think about why you find this stuff upsetting. Is it because you find it icky, or is it because there's actual harm being caused? If these adults were actively and purposefully sharing pornography with minors then that would be a real problem. Cartoons drawn by horny weirdos should be way down on your list of shit to worry about.[/quote]
we're not looking at a diaper fetish in a vacuum. we're seeing that AND the lolicon/babyfur shit AND the zoophilia shit. the diaper fetish art is just an extra detail on top of the much more damning evidence.

#78

Rendoas

-30 Frags – +

Babyfur is not equivalent to lolicon. That would be "cub porn". Babyfur is almost exactly just drawing furry toddlers, and has a lot of overlap with people into age regression, which then is not inherently sexual (but of course sometimes is, depending on who you're asking). What I saw in Lilstarlite's media tab on Bluesky, meaning art they themselves made, didn't at all resemble human children. I did see the aforementioned tampon-eating as mentioned in the OP, but no sexual assault occurring within that image, and, idk, it's gross and I don't like it, but are we saying that a drawing of a cartoon character eating used tampons is evidence of them harming children? Probably not. Similarly, the zoophilic art I could find (there is a lot of variation on what qualifies; I COULD explain it to the best of my ability but the term and its application is very contentious in the furry community right now, and neither of us would enjoy it), seemingly not produced by Lilstarlite themselves although they did share it, leaned much much bizarre and cartoonish to me.

I'm not disagreeing that on a personal level I, too, find these things unappealing and gross. But punishing people for crimes not committed, which is to say, punishing them for partaking in gross fiction, is unacceptable. The evidence here seems to be that OP went out of their way to look at the social media and likes of these people, and not that these people were sharing weird porn with minors. The "crime" being presented here for punishment is people being sexual deviants without involving unconsenting parties, and I think that's some conservative bullshit I can't get down with. Being a freak does not make you a danger to society, but conservative rhetoric sure would have you believe that queer people are pedophiles. Do you see what I'm saying?

Babyfur is not equivalent to lolicon. That would be "cub porn". Babyfur is almost exactly just drawing furry toddlers, and has a lot of overlap with people into age regression, which then is not inherently sexual (but of course sometimes is, depending on who you're asking). What I saw in Lilstarlite's media tab on Bluesky, meaning art they themselves made, didn't at all resemble human children. I did see the aforementioned tampon-eating as mentioned in the OP, but no sexual assault occurring within that image, and, idk, it's gross and I don't like it, but are we saying that a drawing of a cartoon character eating used tampons is evidence of them harming children? Probably not. Similarly, the zoophilic art I could find (there is a lot of variation on what qualifies; I COULD explain it to the best of my ability but the term and its application is very contentious in the furry community right now, and neither of us would enjoy it), seemingly not produced by Lilstarlite themselves although they did share it, leaned much much bizarre and cartoonish to me.

I'm not disagreeing that on a personal level I, too, find these things unappealing and gross. But punishing people for crimes not committed, which is to say, punishing them for partaking in gross fiction, is unacceptable. The evidence here seems to be that OP went out of their way to look at the social media and likes of these people, and not that these people were sharing weird porn with minors. The "crime" being presented here for punishment is people being sexual deviants without involving unconsenting parties, and I think that's some conservative bullshit I can't get down with. Being a freak does not make you a danger to society, but conservative rhetoric sure would have you believe that queer people are pedophiles. Do you see what I'm saying?

#79

gianni

13 Frags – +

Please stop typing bro

#80

coupe

16 Frags – +

i remember when this forum was for discussing tf2

#81

Sale_boat

11 Frags – +

RendoasBabyfur is not equivalent to lolicon. That would be "cub porn". Babyfur is almost exactly just drawing furry toddlers, and has a lot of overlap with people into age regression, which then is not inherently sexual (but of course sometimes is, depending on who you're asking). What I saw in Lilstarlite's media tab on Bluesky, meaning art they themselves made, didn't at all resemble human children. I did see the aforementioned tampon-eating as mentioned in the OP, but no sexual assault occurring within that image, and, idk, it's gross and I don't like it, but are we saying that a drawing of a cartoon character eating used tampons is evidence of them harming children? Probably not. Similarly, the zoophilic art I could find (there is a lot of variation on what qualifies; I COULD explain it to the best of my ability but the term and its application is very contentious in the furry community right now, and neither of us would enjoy it), seemingly not produced by Lilstarlite themselves although they did share it, leaned much much bizarre and cartoonish to me.

I'm not disagreeing that on a personal level I, too, find these things unappealing and gross. But punishing people for crimes not committed, which is to say, punishing them for partaking in gross fiction, is unacceptable. The evidence here seems to be that OP went out of their way to look at the social media and likes of these people, and not that these people were sharing weird porn with minors. The "crime" being presented here for punishment is people being sexual deviants without involving unconsenting parties, and I think that's some conservative bullshit I can't get down with. Being a freak does not make you a danger to society, but conservative rhetoric sure would have you believe that queer people are pedophiles. Do you see what I'm saying?

leave the goon cave and lock in twin

[quote=Rendoas]Babyfur is not equivalent to lolicon. That would be "cub porn". Babyfur is almost exactly just drawing furry toddlers, and has a lot of overlap with people into age regression, which then is not inherently sexual (but of course sometimes is, depending on who you're asking). What I saw in Lilstarlite's media tab on Bluesky, meaning art they themselves made, didn't at all resemble human children. I did see the aforementioned tampon-eating as mentioned in the OP, but no sexual assault occurring within that image, and, idk, it's gross and I don't like it, but are we saying that a drawing of a cartoon character eating used tampons is evidence of them harming children? Probably not. Similarly, the zoophilic art I could find (there is a lot of variation on what qualifies; I COULD explain it to the best of my ability but the term and its application is very contentious in the furry community right now, and neither of us would enjoy it), seemingly not produced by Lilstarlite themselves although they did share it, leaned much much bizarre and cartoonish to me.

I'm not disagreeing that on a personal level I, too, find these things unappealing and gross. But punishing people for crimes not committed, which is to say, punishing them for partaking in gross fiction, is unacceptable. The evidence here seems to be that OP went out of their way to look at the social media and likes of these people, and not that these people were sharing weird porn with minors. The "crime" being presented here for punishment is people being sexual deviants without involving unconsenting parties, and I think that's some conservative bullshit I can't get down with. Being a freak does not make you a danger to society, but conservative rhetoric sure would have you believe that queer people are pedophiles. Do you see what I'm saying?[/quote]
leave the goon cave and lock in twin

#82

justjazz

3 Frags – +

Rendoaspervert freak nonsense

anyone who posts stuff like this should be hunted for sport

[quote=Rendoas]pervert freak nonsense[/quote]
anyone who posts stuff like this should be hunted for sport

#83

durzo

9 Frags – +

RendoasBabyfur is not equivalent to lolicon. That would be "cub porn". Babyfur is almost exactly just drawing furry toddlers, and has a lot of overlap with people into age regression, which then is not inherently sexual (but of course sometimes is, depending on who you're asking). What I saw in Lilstarlite's media tab on Bluesky, meaning art they themselves made, didn't at all resemble human children. I did see the aforementioned tampon-eating as mentioned in the OP, but no sexual assault occurring within that image, and, idk, it's gross and I don't like it, but are we saying that a drawing of a cartoon character eating used tampons is evidence of them harming children? Probably not. Similarly, the zoophilic art I could find (there is a lot of variation on what qualifies; I COULD explain it to the best of my ability but the term and its application is very contentious in the furry community right now, and neither of us would enjoy it), seemingly not produced by Lilstarlite themselves although they did share it, leaned much much bizarre and cartoonish to me.

I'm not disagreeing that on a personal level I, too, find these things unappealing and gross. But punishing people for crimes not committed, which is to say, punishing them for partaking in gross fiction, is unacceptable. The evidence here seems to be that OP went out of their way to look at the social media and likes of these people, and not that these people were sharing weird porn with minors. The "crime" being presented here for punishment is people being sexual deviants without involving unconsenting parties, and I think that's some conservative bullshit I can't get down with. Being a freak does not make you a danger to society, but conservative rhetoric sure would have you believe that queer people are pedophiles. Do you see what I'm saying?

somebody told me to come back to tftv to look at this post and honestly i am all for a second great flood to destroy this planet and all those that walk upon it

[quote=Rendoas]Babyfur is not equivalent to lolicon. That would be "cub porn". Babyfur is almost exactly just drawing furry toddlers, and has a lot of overlap with people into age regression, which then is not inherently sexual (but of course sometimes is, depending on who you're asking). What I saw in Lilstarlite's media tab on Bluesky, meaning art they themselves made, didn't at all resemble human children. I did see the aforementioned tampon-eating as mentioned in the OP, but no sexual assault occurring within that image, and, idk, it's gross and I don't like it, but are we saying that a drawing of a cartoon character eating used tampons is evidence of them harming children? Probably not. Similarly, the zoophilic art I could find (there is a lot of variation on what qualifies; I COULD explain it to the best of my ability but the term and its application is very contentious in the furry community right now, and neither of us would enjoy it), seemingly not produced by Lilstarlite themselves although they did share it, leaned much much bizarre and cartoonish to me.

I'm not disagreeing that on a personal level I, too, find these things unappealing and gross. But punishing people for crimes not committed, which is to say, punishing them for partaking in gross fiction, is unacceptable. The evidence here seems to be that OP went out of their way to look at the social media and likes of these people, and not that these people were sharing weird porn with minors. The "crime" being presented here for punishment is people being sexual deviants without involving unconsenting parties, and I think that's some conservative bullshit I can't get down with. Being a freak does not make you a danger to society, but conservative rhetoric sure would have you believe that queer people are pedophiles. Do you see what I'm saying?[/quote]

somebody told me to come back to tftv to look at this post and honestly i am all for a second great flood to destroy this planet and all those that walk upon it

#84

Jw

6 Frags – +

Rendoas

Setting aside the fact that you draw furry porn, "if it's legal, it shouldn't be bannable" is a pretty strange argument. Cheating is legal and should be bannable because it hurts the competitive integrity of the league; being a pedophile or "zoophile" is also legal, but it should also be bannable because it hurts the social integrity of the league.

The question is not only whether a literal child has been harmed, but whether the integrity of the league is maintained, or whether the community is made better or worse by allowing this kind of behavior. Since bestiality and pedophilia are definitely wrong, and since they definitely make the league worse, they shouldn't be allowed. It's really that simple.

[quote=Rendoas][/quote]Setting aside the fact that you draw furry porn, "if it's legal, it shouldn't be bannable" is a pretty strange argument. Cheating is legal and should be bannable because it hurts the competitive integrity of the league; being a pedophile or "zoophile" is also legal, but it should also be bannable because it hurts the [i]social[/i] integrity of the league.

The question is not only whether a literal child has been harmed, but whether the integrity of the league is maintained, or whether the community is made better or worse by allowing this kind of behavior. Since bestiality and pedophilia are definitely wrong, and since they definitely make the league worse, they shouldn't be allowed. It's really that simple.

#85

vecc

3 Frags – +

Rendoasdegenerate

INSANE hill to die on legit insane why would you even think this was a good idea

[quote=Rendoas]degenerate[/quote]

INSANE hill to die on legit insane why would you even think this was a good idea

#86

denzy_

0 Frags – +

RendoasBabyfur is not equivalent to lolicon. That would be "cub porn"

this entire post is a fucking mess gang..
sentence this user to a eternity playing mahjong, right now.

[quote=Rendoas]Babyfur is not equivalent to lolicon. That would be "cub porn"[/quote]

this entire post is a fucking mess gang..
sentence this user to a eternity playing mahjong, right now.

#87

Natalexei

5 Frags – +

RendoasHow old are you, OP? Anti and proship discourse is probably the most chronically online teenager shit anyone could give a fuck about.

me when I call something chronically online while proceeding to post on a dying thread to participate in such activity.

RendoasBeing a freak does not make you a danger to society, but conservative rhetoric sure would have you believe that queer people are pedophiles. Do you see what I'm saying?

this wording is fucking insane because you're just straight up implying all queer people are freaks, don't lump us all in with that shit.
anyway thanks for resuscitating a dying thread only to hand the bad faith anti-trans morons more shit to pick apart on a silver platter, as if we didn't have enough of that in this thread already

[quote=Rendoas]How old are you, OP? Anti and proship discourse is probably the most chronically online teenager shit anyone could give a fuck about.[/quote]
me when I call something chronically online while proceeding to post on a dying thread to participate in such activity.

[quote=Rendoas]Being a freak does not make you a danger to society, but conservative rhetoric sure would have you believe that queer people are pedophiles. Do you see what I'm saying?[/quote]
this wording is fucking insane because you're just straight up implying all queer people are freaks, don't lump us all in with that shit.
anyway thanks for resuscitating a dying thread only to hand the bad faith anti-trans morons more shit to pick apart on a silver platter, as if we didn't have enough of that in this thread already

#88

Prime-Sanity

-4 Frags – +

RendoasWhatever the fuck that text was

Do better.

[quote=Rendoas]Whatever the fuck that text was[/quote]
Do better.

#89

Rendoas

-10 Frags – +

Natalexeidying thread.

2 days lol

Natalexei you're just straight up implying all queer people are freaks

Sorry to tell you this, but we are just freaks and faggots to these people. The quest to sanitize ourselves enough for them is futile. The goalposts will always be moved. Case in point, this dude making it about me drawing furry porn at all as if that is some kind of reprehensible and disgusting activity I should feel ashamed for, even after I clarified that I am not even into the kind of art mentioned by OP, which is easily verifiable.

JwSetting aside the fact that you draw furry porn

Enjoy your conservative circlejerk leftist LARP. I'm sure if we keep disavowing different groups of weirdos for being the wrong kinds of weird then they'll stop trying to take away trans rights and gay marriage!

[quote=Natalexei]dying thread.[/quote]
2 days lol

[quote=Natalexei] you're just straight up implying all queer people are freaks[/quote]
Sorry to tell you this, but we are just freaks and faggots to these people. The quest to sanitize ourselves enough for them is futile. The goalposts will always be moved. Case in point, this dude making it about me drawing furry porn [i]at all[/i] as if that is some kind of reprehensible and disgusting activity I should feel ashamed for, even after I clarified that I am not even into the kind of art mentioned by OP, which is easily verifiable.
[quote=Jw]Setting aside the fact that you draw furry porn[/quote]

Enjoy your conservative circlejerk leftist LARP. I'm sure if we keep disavowing different groups of weirdos for being the wrong kinds of weird then they'll stop trying to take away trans rights and gay marriage!

#90

Natalexei

0 Frags – +

my bad guys apparently I'm in a conservative circlejerk because Jesus Wins from Vatican Catholicism made a stupid remark about something unrelated to the topic, god this thread fucking sucks

https://imgur.com/a/aSeN7Yr

my bad guys apparently I'm in a conservative circlejerk because Jesus Wins from Vatican Catholicism made a stupid remark about something unrelated to the topic, god this thread fucking sucks

https://imgur.com/a/aSeN7Yr